The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
 Search This Thread  Search This Forum  Search Reviews  Search Gear Database  Search Gear for sale  Search Gearslutz Go Advanced
Ashlee Simpson and the hidden agenda Dynamics Plugins
Old 19th May 2006
  #61
500 series nutjob
 
pan60's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexLakis
There's nothing PC about this thread.

Besides, RC Cola obviously tastes better because it LOOKS better:

RC Cola rocks!
Old 19th May 2006
  #62
Here for the gear
 

I think i can get to the heart of what djwayne is saying here:

David M. Jacobs, PHD is a history professor of long standing at Temple University. http://www.ufoevidence.org/topics/DavidJacobs.htm

I find Dr. Jacobs series of erotic novels quite strange, and I have a hard time becoming aroused by them. In one sequence, an Adult Hybrid forced a recalcitrant woman to hold his penis for several hours. I disagree with that!

In many cases, normal people are brought into scenarios like this and forced to interact with these Hybrid Toddlers. First, they "Present" the Hybrid Toddlers to you. These bug eyed toddler freaks playing with fire trucks and stuff. That's just taking it too far. I don't need to see that. What in the name of God could be more unholy than those bug eyed Hybrid Toddlers?

I should not have to see that. I should not have to be "Presented" with Hybrid Toddlers. They should not "Present" the Hybrid Toddlers to me. I should be free from experiences in which I am "Presented" with Hybrid Toddlers. I do not think it is right to "Present" members with Hybrid Toddler materials. Please do not "Present" those bug eyed freaks to the members of Gearslutz, or to Gearslutz forums in general.

djwayne, please refrain from "Presenting" Hybrid Toddlers to the members. We should not have to be "Presented" with Hybrid Toddlers.

We should be free from the "Presentation" of Hybrid Toddlers, or Hybrid Toddler related materials.

True enough that djwayne's sentiments on Ashlee Simpson and pop music in general are somewhat meaningful, and may represent a kind of cultural crossroads for many of us here. But djwayne should be able to achieve this without reference to Hybrid Toddlers.

So, in conclusion, please ask djwayne not to "Present" the group with Hybrid Toddlers. This group should be free from the experience of being "Presented" with Hybrid Toddlers. I do not think the "Presentation" of Hybrid Toddlers is appropriate to this group. Please do not "Present" this group with Hybrid Toddlers, or Hybrid Toddler Related Materials (HTRM).



Thank you very much.


p.s. It is not appropriate to "Present" the group with Hybrid Toddlers.

Last edited by JohnDJwayne; 19th May 2006 at 05:27 AM.. Reason: Hybrid Toddlers
Old 19th May 2006
  #63
Lives for gear
 
TheReal7's Avatar
 

As everyone, that is subscribbed to the thread, now knows that Chris Farrow = JohnDJwayne
Old 19th May 2006
  #64
Gear Guru
 
rickrock305's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnDJwayne
I think i can get to the heart of what djwayne is saying here:

David M. Jacobs, PHD is a history professor of long standing at Temple University. http://www.ufoevidence.org/topics/DavidJacobs.htm

I find Dr. Jacobs series of erotic novels quite strange, and I have a hard time becoming aroused by them. In one sequence, an Adult Hybrid forced a recalcitrant woman to hold his penis for several hours. I disagree with that!

In many cases, normal people are brought into scenarios like this and forced to interact with these Hybrid Toddlers. First, they "Present" the Hybrid Toddlers to you. These bug eyed toddler freaks playing with fire trucks and stuff. That's just taking it too far. I don't need to see that. What in the name of God could be more unholy than those bug eyed Hybrid Toddlers?

I should not have to see that. I should not have to be "Presented" with Hybrid Toddlers. They should not "Present" the Hybrid Toddlers to me. I should be free from experiences in which I am "Presented" with Hybrid Toddlers. I do not think it is right to "Present" members with Hybrid Toddler materials. Please do not "Present" those bug eyed freaks to the members of Gearslutz, or to Gearslutz forums in general.

djwayne, please refrain from "Presenting" Hybrid Toddlers to the members. We should not have to be "Presented" with Hybrid Toddlers.

We should be free from the "Presentation" of Hybrid Toddlers, or Hybrid Toddler related materials.

True enough that djwayne's sentiments on Ashlee Simpson and pop music in general are somewhat meaningful, and may represent a kind of cultural crossroads for many of us here. But djwayne should be able to achieve this without reference to Hybrid Toddlers.

So, in conclusion, please ask djwayne not to "Present" the group with Hybrid Toddlers. This group should be free from the experience of being "Presented" with Hybrid Toddlers. I do not think the "Presentation" of Hybrid Toddlers is appropriate to this group. Please do not "Present" this group with Hybrid Toddlers, or Hybrid Toddler Related Materials (HTRM).



Thank you very much.


p.s. It is not appropriate to "Present" the group with Hybrid Toddlers.


WHAT...... THE........ HELL........ WAS........ THAT.......
Old 19th May 2006
  #65
Lives for gear
 
Greg Wells's Avatar
The antidote, or not:

Bat chain
Puller
Bat chain puller
Puller, puller

A chain with yellow lights
That glistens like oil beads
On its slick smooth trunk
That trails behind on tracks, and thumps
A wing hangs limp and retreats

Bat chain puller
Puller puller

Bulbs shoot from its snoot
And vanish into darkness
It whistles like a root snatched from dry earth
Sodbustin’ rakes with grey dust claws
Announces its coming in the morning
This train with grey tubes
That houses people’s very thoughts and belongings.

Bat chain puller
Puller puller

This train with grey tubes that houses people’s thoughts,
Their very remains and belongings.
A grey cloth patch
Caught with four threads
In the hollow wind of its stacks
Ripples felt fades and grey sparks clacks,
Lunging the cushioned thickets.
Pumpkins span the hills
With orange crayola patches.
Green inflated trees
Balloon up into marshmallow soot
That walks away in forty circles,
Caught in grey blisters
With twinkling lights and green sashes
Uuh
Pulled by rubber dolphins with gold yawning mouths
That blister and break in agony
In souls of rust
They kill gold sawdust into dust.

Bat chain puller,
Puller puller.
Old 19th May 2006
  #66
500 series nutjob
 
pan60's Avatar
 

dose JohnDJwayne post read like spam or what?
Old 19th May 2006
  #67
Lives for gear
 

"JohnDJwayne" is a nut case.
Old 19th May 2006
  #68
Here for the gear
 

Hybrid Toddlers

Quote:
Originally Posted by djwayne
"JohnDJwayne" is a nut case.
djwayne has done it again. He has "Presented" the Hybrid Toddler agenda to us. I do not think we should be "Presented" with Hybrid Toddlers, or Hybrid Toddler Related Materials (HTRM).

I think we should be free from "Presentation" of Hybrid Toddlers. Djwayne, please do not "Present" the group with description, photos, or graphic depictions of Hybrid Toddlers.

So, in conclusion, djwayne is clearly in collusion with Dr. David M. Jacobs, and intends to "Present" the group with graphic depictions of Hybrid Toddlers. Djwayne, please in the future refrain from "Presenting" us with Hybrid Toddlers.


Thank you.

p.s. This includes peripheral references to Hybrid Toddlers. We should not be "Presented" with peripheral references to Hybrid Toddlers, or Hybrid Toddler Related Materials. '

Last edited by JohnDJwayne; 19th May 2006 at 03:45 PM.. Reason: Hybrid Toddlers
Old 19th May 2006
  #69
Lives for gear
 
Harley-OIART's Avatar
 

Are Spammers Junkies & Hackers really this lame?

I know some brilliant hackers who do great things, but wasting time "sticking it" to a very well run Internet Community is IMNSHO pretty gay.

Do something constructive please ppl. (Mind you, even responding to these rash of posts is counter-productive...)
Old 19th May 2006
  #70
Lives for gear
 

Stay off the drugs, you're hallucinating.

You really do need to get help dude. You're sick, very sick, the doctors will give you the right medications that will help you to think straight, and stop the voices.
Old 19th May 2006
  #71
Lives for gear
 
Dave Peck's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnDJwayne
djwayne has done it again. He has "Presented" the Hybrid Toddler agenda to us. '
Yeah, knock it off, djwayne! I'm gettin' really tired of the Hybrid Toddler agenda! They don't deserve special rights! Next thing you know they're gonna want us to legalize Hybrid Toddler marriage! This country is goin' to hell!

DP
Old 20th May 2006
  #72
Lives for gear
 
Harley-OIART's Avatar
 

What am I missing here? ???
Old 20th May 2006
  #73
Gear Addict
 
Relax's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Peck
Yeah, knock it off, djwayne! I'm gettin' really tired of the Hybrid Toddler agenda! They don't deserve special rights! Next thing you know they're gonna want us to legalize Hybrid Toddler marriage! This country is goin' to hell!

DP
omg, I'm crying!
Old 20th May 2006
  #74
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sounds Great
just to be fair - i've seen PLENTY of LAME live footage of
almost EVERY "ROCK BAND" and "POP ACT" in our history.
(of course there are exceptions - bowie, elo, etc.
people who were ACTUALLY aware of their ticket-buying audiences,
but there's PLENTY of AWFUL live footage of them, as well).

zeppelin was especially bad,
enough to make me point out to my friends,
over and over again, over the years, since i was a teenager,
that this (producer-driven and "session musician"-assembled "band",
who, i might add, wrote some MIGHTY LAME lyrics, much of the time)
could basically NOT perform LIVE,
no matter what anyone SAYS to me,
and no matter what any RECORD COMPANY MARKETED AT ME.

i've always trusted my own ears and brain. and, i'm sorry
but i've got TOO MANY ACTUAL MUSICIAN FRIENDS
who just BLOW all these LAME-ASS performers away.

for every asslee & zep, there's a trane and a franz liszt.
i'm sorry, folks if we're REALLY talking about music -
there is JUST NO F*CKING COMPARISON.


so using THESE "standards", PLEASE TELL ME,
WHAT'S THE F&CKING DIFFERENCE?

not to mention, WHO FR*GG%N CARES??

personally, on a real "musician performer" scale of 1-10,

i'd give aslee about a 2, to maybe 3, on her best night
and zep about a 2, to maybe 5, on their best night

trane, i would've given about a 4, to a 10, on his best night,
and word of mouth orchestra about a 5-10, on their best night.
billie or ella, miles, herbie, mckoy, dizzy, etc. great live ratings.
(again, as MUSICIAN PERFORMERS)

as far as pop stars go, i'd give prince and mj the crowns -

prince a 6-10 on any performance

and mj, the same.

rock star musician performers,

i'd give jimmy necco and "ours" one of the crowns.

zappa was a great musician, but a relatively boring performer.

madonna was a pretty good performer, pretty cool dancer,
and mostly can't sing to save her life.

robbie williams, the same. he's a great performer - i saw him ROCK
a SOLD OUT LONDON ARENA SHOW a few years ago - and i coudn't BELIEVE IT -
the audience LOVED him.

sheryl crowe's a decent enough musician for a pop artist (writer, producer, singer, player, etc.),
but pretty boring to watch. i'd never PAY to see that.

christina aguilera can sing her ass off, her material's probably half decent, and she can dance ok.

imo, sonny rollins makes mostly horrible records,
but he's AMAZING live - the OPPOSITE of most "pop" acts.

u2 are ok performers - but i couldn't, personally,
listen to I-IV-V for 3 hours, no matter HOW great the light show is.

zakir hussain - great recordings, great performances.

vienna philharmonic - great records, great live performances -
sure, i wish they were jumping through rings of fire, simultaneously, a la cirque du soleil, but waddeva.

it's all SOOOOO subjective, but if we're talking about ACTUAL MUSICIAN PERFORMERS,

that's my $.02
Old 20th May 2006
  #75
Lives for gear
 
theblotted's Avatar
 

.....
Attached Thumbnails
Ashlee Simpson and the hidden agenda-sucks13.jpg  
Old 20th May 2006
  #76
Gear Guru
 
Sounds Great's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sqye

that's my $.02[/B]

Oh come now. Anybody who watches that video can't seriously confuse Simpson with someone who can actually sing.

I'm guessing in the studio they actually use a "stunt double"? heh
Old 22nd May 2006
  #77
Here for the gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by djwayne
Stay off the drugs, you're hallucinating.

You really do need to get help dude. You're sick, very sick, the doctors will give you the right medications that will help you to think straight, and stop the voices.
Thank you, Mr. Wayne. Though you don't know it, i'm one of your biggest fans. I appreciate your tenacity in the face of such hardship (the group's distaste for Ms. Simpson, and disrespect of your appreciation for her work). It's all falling into place Mr. djwayne, and I think I can state with confidence that you will find the cleanliness of a Manhattan sophisticate's vagina much to your liking. Her tendency to cavort with high powered literary agents and exploit young women with Ivy League aspirations (as well as their parents) should matter little to a man of your worldly tastes.

Please, though, I must insist:

Whether or not there is such a thing as Hybrid Toddlers (in addition to, as David M. Jacobs, long standing history professor at Temple University states: Hybrid Adolescents and Adult Hybrids), this is simply not the forum in which to examine this phenomenon.

I do not think we should be "Presented" with Hybrid Porno. These explicit films feature only Adult Hybrids, but nonetheless... I find this material quite disturbing, Mr. djwayne! Please refrain from posting links to depictions of graphic sex between these so called "Adult Hybrids". Please refrain from your veiled references to Hybrid Porno, and Hybrid Porno Related Materials. Please do not begin, as I suspect you intend to do, to describe in detail certain "Scenes" from these "Hybrid Porno" movies. Please do not "Present" us with material which refers to, suggests, or otherwise points the member toward "Hybrid Porno".

"Hybrid Porno" is a growing problem in the US. I do not think I should have to be "Presented" with Hybrid Porno. I do not think it is right to "Present" Hybrid Porno to the group. I do not think the group should be “Presented” with Hybrid Porno.

These short "Scenes" as they are sometimes called, have been reported on the popular site "myspace.com", as well as other venues on the "World Wide Web". I have no control over this. I am only saying Mr. Wayne, please refrain from your constant barrage of references to "Hybrid Porno", and Hybrid Porno Related Materials.


So, in conclusion, I find the services at my church in Pasadena to be satisfactory in the vast number of cases.

Naya Slovick

P.S. I do not think it is right to “Present” the group with “Hybrid Porno”, or to describe “Scenes” from this so called “Hybrid Porno”. I do not think we should be "Presented" with "Hybrid Porno". Please do not "Present" us with "Hybrid Porno".

Last edited by JohnDJwayne; 22nd May 2006 at 02:26 AM.. Reason: Hybrid Toddlers
Old 22nd May 2006
  #78
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sounds Great
Oh come now. Anybody who watches that video can't seriously confuse Simpson with someone who can actually sing.

I'm guessing in the studio they actually use a "stunt double"? heh
i'm guessing that they used a stunt double in the studio for led zeppelin, as well.

Plant almost NEVER sounded even CLOSE live to what he did in the studio.

and for that matter, neither did Page .

THAT's my point.

sloppy, out of tune, etc. - so they PLAYED their OWN INSTRUMENTS. SO WHAT?
who wants to listen to that trash?

Not me.

i'm so sick of hearing the same LAME arguments from all the Guitar Center helmet clones -
i can't even DEAL.

if i want to listen to real musicians playing real music,
i'll go see chick corea or sonny rollins, or the vienna philharmonic.

f*ck all this lam-ass bullsh*t.

most people slamming aslee, wouldn't know real music if it hit them in the head with a sledge hammer,
THAT's the IRONIC thing.
Old 22nd May 2006
  #79
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sqye
i'm guessing that they used a stunt double in the studio for led zeppelin, as well.

Plant almost NEVER sounded even CLOSE live to what he did in the studio.

and for that matter, neither did Page .

THAT's my point.

sloppy, out of tune, etc. - so they PLAYED their OWN INSTRUMENTS. SO WHAT?
who wants to listen to that trash?

Not me.

i'm so sick of hearing the same LAME arguments from all the Guitar Center helmet clones -
i can't even DEAL.

if i want to listen to real musicians playing real music,
i'll go see chick corea or sonny rollins, or the vienna philharmonic.

f*ck all this lam-ass bullsh*t.

most people slamming aslee, wouldn't know real music if it hit them in the head with a sledge hammer,
THAT's the IRONIC thing.
ok. so now we have fully clarified things.

ashlee simpson = led zeppelin.

point well taken.

Old 22nd May 2006
  #80
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by eligit
ok. so now we have fully clarified things.

ashlee simpson = led zeppelin.

point well taken.

it's all pop music to me

you can take sides all you like.

very few real musicians i know who would go near ANY of that sh*t.

a few. but very few.

after all, it's MOSTLY marketing.

and we're ALL victims.

atlantic records spent millions and millions making DAMN SURE
every teenage boy thought zeppelin was "cool", including you and me.

including spinning them AD INFINITUM for EVER AND EVER.

the same way geffen spends on aslee impressions to female teens today.

so if you want to buy into ALL THAT, BE MY GUEST.

personally, i think it's all a bunch of pop bs.

sure, when i was 12, i loved led zeppelin.

and when i was 5, i loved sesame street.

it was all marketed RIGHT AT ME, and i ate it up.

whatever, brittney, zep, bee gees, o.c., gilligans' island, sesame street, harry potter - TAKE YOUR PICK.

i don't really see the difference. different flavor of mass produced bubble gum.

hey, baby when you walk that way, what's on a trip, can't keep away.

gimme a f&ckin' break
Old 22nd May 2006
  #81
Lives for gear
 
Jose Mrochek's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sqye

personally, i think it's all a bunch of pop bs.
massive hit music is the hardest music to make. marketing my ass, people don´t buy what they don´t like irregardless of the radio spins. I do agree with something you said though, musicaly complex yeah maybe you could compare ashlee´s songs to led zeppelin. But to put äshlee as an artist side by side with ledzeppelin is like saying ferrari´s and volkwagens are cars. As to the vienna orchestra and stuff, yeah.. if you practice violin for decades 8 hours a day, you may eventually be a world class player, but the difference with pop is that you can write songs for decades and NEVER have a hit single.
Old 22nd May 2006
  #82
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jose Mrochek
massive hit music is the hardest music to make. marketing my ass, people don´t buy what they don´t like irregardless of the radio spins. I do agree with something you said though, musicaly complex yeah maybe you could compare ashlee´s songs to led zeppelin. But to put äshlee as an artist side by side with ledzeppelin is like saying ferrari´s and volkwagens are cars. As to the vienna orchestra and stuff, yeah.. if you practice violin for decades 8 hours a day, you may eventually be a world class player, but the difference with pop is that you can write songs for decades and NEVER have a hit single.
so you're saying led zeppelin wasn't marketed
at you and i 8 gagillion times a day?

you MAY be smoking crack

aslee and zep recordings are, imo, not SO DIFFERENT.

THAT's what i'm saying.

both have pretty LAME lyrics, and both are MARKETED HEAVILY
to a VERY APPRECIATIVE, and mostly musically uneducated audience.

i noticed that you so readily jumped on the vienna philharmonic observation,
but only noted the capacity of the individual player - thereby COMPLETELY missing my point.

my point was an observation about music PERIOD.

as regards the car comparison,
to say zep and aslee are both cars and zep is a ferrari is UTTER BS.

zep is just as much of a toyota as aslee is.

i've noticed in other threads, Jose, that you don't "like" or "appreciate" jazz.

to me, good jazz PERFORMANCES are equivalent to a 5 star meal,
whereas the best pop LIVE PERFORMANCES, are equivalent to a snickers bar.
(once i've heard them once or twice, i've heard everything there is to hear,
ad there's not necesarily very much more "content" for me to ingest -
they're usually out of tune, sloppy - baby, baby, don't leave me, whatever ).

of course, there can be exceptions to the rule.

i think prince and mj are some of those exceptions.
Old 22nd May 2006
  #83
Lives for gear
 
Jose Mrochek's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sqye
so you're saying led zeppelin wasn't marketed
at you and i 8 gagillion times a day?

you MAY be smoking crack
marketing is necesary because you won´t hear it otherwise. but theres tons and tons of stuff that is hugely marketed but you or me don´t buy it right ? you can lead a horse to water but you cant make him drink it right ? : )
Old 22nd May 2006
  #84
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sqye
it's all pop music to me

you can take sides all you like.

very few real musicians i know who would go near ANY of that sh*t.

a few. but very few.

after all, it's MOSTLY marketing.

and we're ALL victims.

atlantic records spent millions and millions making DAMN SURE
every teenage boy thought zeppelin was "cool", including you and me.

including spinning them AD INFINITUM for EVER AND EVER.

the same way geffen spends on aslee impressions to female teens today.

so if you want to buy into ALL THAT, BE MY GUEST.

personally, i think it's all a bunch of pop bs.

sure, when i was 12, i loved led zeppelin.

and when i was 5, i loved sesame street.

it was all marketed RIGHT AT ME, and i ate it up.

whatever, brittney, zep, bee gees, o.c., gilligans' island, sesame street, harry potter - TAKE YOUR PICK.

i don't really see the difference. different flavor of mass produced bubble gum.

hey, baby when you walk that way, what's on a trip, can't keep away.

gimme a f&ckin' break
musicians from modern jazz to hard core classical top orchestral musicans i have met love zeppelin. i mean serious schooled people (composers, players, engineers, etc) ranting and raving about john bonham and the rest of em..people 25 years older than me and 15 years younger.

marketing is entirely besides the point. when something is great..it's great. bartok, ligeti, bach, coltrane, miles, zep, hendrix...what kicks ass kicks ass. period.

the fact that you cannot tell the difference between brittney and zep is just a sad thing.

i know it's some hipper than thou statement or whatever but it's still stupid.
Old 22nd May 2006
  #85
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by eligit
musicians from modern jazz to hard core classical top orchestral musicans i have met love zeppelin. i mean serious schooled people (composers, players, engineers, etc) ranting and raving about john bonham and the rest of em..people 25 years older than me and 15 years younger.

marketing is entirely besides the point. when something is great..it's great. bartok, ligeti, bach, coltrane, miles, zep, hendrix...what kicks ass kicks ass. period.

the fact that you cannot tell the difference between brittney and zep is just a sad thing.

i know it's some hipper than thou statement or whatever but it's still stupid.
the fact that YOU cannot tell the difference is a SADDER THING

whatever - preaching to the blind
Old 22nd May 2006
  #86
Lives for gear
 

JohnDJwayne has done it again. He has presented to the forums his "Ashlee Simpson hidden agenda, his Hybrid Toddlers, (whatever that is), and now Hybrid porno, (what the hell is that ? )

The only hybrid anything I'm familiar with is hybrid cars.

"JohnDJwayne" is obviously a stoned out and/or obsessed individual to continue this nonsensical spam.

Sounds like a very sick individual to me. Derrainged !!!

Beforwarned good people, this forum is cursed with this derrainged charature stalking and harassing not only me, but everyone else here.

Do NOT, I repeat DO NOT agree to meet this person under any circumstances, as he could become dangerous.

Hopefull, the moderators will pick up on this, lock this post, and forever ban JohnDJwayne from the forums. Hopefully they have recorded his IP address for future use and security reasons.

This is not a joke. This is not a drill. It's for real. The guy is nuts.
Old 22nd May 2006
  #87
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sqye
the fact that YOU cannot tell the difference is a SADDER THING

whatever - preaching to the blind
i can tell the difference.

but they all share one thing: they are all great music in their respective styles.
Old 22nd May 2006
  #88
Gear Addict
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jose Mrochek
massive hit music is the hardest music to make. marketing my ass, people don´t buy what they don´t like irregardless of the radio spins. I do agree with something you said though, musicaly complex yeah maybe you could compare ashlee´s songs to led zeppelin. But to put äshlee as an artist side by side with ledzeppelin is like saying ferrari´s and volkwagens are cars. As to the vienna orchestra and stuff, yeah.. if you practice violin for decades 8 hours a day, you may eventually be a world class player, but the difference with pop is that you can write songs for decades and NEVER have a hit single.
Your last statement is correct because your first one is false. -It's "All About Money", Jose. Yeah, plugging my yet to be recorded song. Unfortunately, most people do most things they do because they were brainwashed to. And also, people don't choose from things that they don't know about. It's like the presidential election in this country for instance - you don't have to vote republican or democrat, but most people will - MARKETING. The only reason I don't have MULITPLE hits is that nobody has heard my stuff. In my case, it's because I've never manged to finish recording any of them! So I never give myself a chance. In your case, until you make the masses aware of your album, they don't even realize you are on the ballot.

But hey, this thread was supposed to be about "Hybrid Toddlers" or "Presenting". Lets get back on topic.
Old 22nd May 2006
  #89
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jose Mrochek
marketing is necesary because you won´t hear it otherwise. but theres tons and tons of stuff that is hugely marketed but you or me don´t buy it right ? you can lead a horse to water but you cant make him drink it right ? : )
"marketing" is only "NECESSARY" so COMPANIES CAN MAKE MONEY.


THIS INCLUDES LABELS, MANAGEMENT, PUBLISHING, LAW FIRMS, RADIO, ETC.

I'M TERRIBLY SORRY, BUT I DON'T SEE HOW ANY OF THIS HAS ANYTHING WHATSEOVER TO DO WITH

MUSIC.


Old 22nd May 2006
  #90
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by eyesore

But hey, this thread was supposed to be about "Hybrid Toddlers" or "Presenting". Lets get back on topic.
LOL
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearslutz Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.


 
 
Slide to join now Processing…
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter / Forum
Replies
DonPedro / So much gear, so little time
9
Kestral / Gear free zone - shoot the breeze
17
djwayne / So much gear, so little time
212
RyanR / The Moan Zone
11

Forum Jump
Forum Jump