Quote:
Originally Posted by
thethrillfactor
➡️
Instead of building a box, just change the fans for the quietest you can find.
Sadly the loudest part of the computer is the graphics card. I actually really like my case. It has some dampening material in the covers and the air intakes are baffled.
Here's a
link in case anyone needs a quieter case.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
thethrillfactor
➡️
I've attached the reflections you may want to suppress for 500hz/630hz. First of all i find it easier to study the Impulse Response and ETC with a linear Y axis (set to %FS instead of dBFS).
That is much easier to read! Thank you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
thethrillfactor
➡️
The Filtered ETC is primarily aimed at examining decay behaviour in different frequency bands and analysing the results per ISO 3382. When studying the filtered ETC ideally you want the Schroeder integral curve to look like a straight line or slope with no bumps.
... Schroeder integral curve... yes...
"Thus, EDC (Schroeder Integral Curve) is the total amount of signal energy remaining in the reverberator impulse response at time. The EDC decays more smoothly than the impulse response itself, and so it is more useful than ordinary amplitude envelopes for estimating RT60."
So this curve measures the amount of energy at a frequency, relative to the original source signal and it should decay smoothly, which would indicate that there is less constructive/destructive interference with the original signal?
I'm fairly certain that I don't understand, but I will read about it. Also, I found ISO 3382, but I can't drop $80 on it at the moment lol. I will look at the summary again.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
thethrillfactor
➡️
When you select show data panel The RT60 figures include the decay range over which they have been calculated and an "r" value, the regression coefficient, which measures how well the data corresponds to a straight line. A value of -1 would indicate a perfect fit, values lower in magnitude than -0.98 indicate the corresponding decay figure may not be reliable.
So for example if you look at at the 500hz filtered ETC data panel, EDT, T20 and T30 are all in orange. This means they aren't close enough to -1(below -.98).
Wow! So the data panel shows how close or far from T20 and T30 the measurement is at a given frequency! Awesome! I always wished there was a "how far off am I?" function, and this graph has it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
thethrillfactor
➡️
Looking at 500 hz with % selected, you have a reflection that is 40% energy compared to the impulse( which is alot). It had to travel 8.69ms(9ft 9 inches) further to reach the microphone compared to the impulse itself. The impulse measurement is the distance from the speaker to the mic, so if the measurement mic is 10 ft from speaker add 9 ft 9 inches or 19ft 9 inches of travel for reflection.
Right... I remember this now from physics class, and again from trying to fix past rooms.
343m/s or 3m/ms.
I think the mic was about 5' and so that impulse went around 13-15ft. That's definitely the opposite side wall FR point. So now I know I need to add treatment to that location that is effective between 500-630.
I've probably read good explanations of that a ton of times but I needed to be walked through it (again). Thank you!
Quote:
Originally Posted by
thethrillfactor
➡️
If you do the entire ceiling it will hit the ceiling corners as well.
The ceiling/wall corners are straddled with 1" Armstrong Optima Ceiling tiles. (picture).
The space behind the 24" front is loosely filled with R30. I have considered moving the ceiling tile material (looks like 703 or 701) to the back of the soffit and covering the front with fabric.
Incidentally, this is a very cheap and quick way to make a decent ceiling wall corner trap that looks pretty good considering the amount of work and materials that went into it, but it does take away options for full ceiling treatment like running some wires across the ceiling filling with R30 and then covering with fabric.
Thanks again for your help!