The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
Who uses their EYE'S as well as their ears?
Old 19th May 2003
  #1
Lives for gear
 
Ol' Betsey's Avatar
Who uses their EYE'S as well as their ears?

(Sorry, momentarily distracted by the hail storm commencing outside my flat in London. Don't you just love the English Spring?)

Anyway, reading what John and HiFi said over on the Hardy thread got me thinking...

Quote:
I have never once in my years of owning the M1's wish I had the put the full metering on ...
This last week I was recording a band and ran out of pre-amps. One of the kids had this cheap little Joe Meek box that I decided to use as an extra pre for one of my mash-it-up ambient mics.

Setting it up I realised that what I was seeing couldn't really be too related to what I was hearing (stuck in the red but not sounding pushed at all) so I just cranked it all up till this thing really started crying and then backed it off until it was more or less just a grumpy little face in the back seat. All the while the meters still said virtually nothing to me. Sure, they were flashing a bit but that's about it.

Another example would be Mr. David Derr's Distressor. The meters can be telling you your whacking the shiggy out of it but it still doesn't sound like 15-20 db of compression. Ok, I know they're not VU's but my point is the same, to some of us unseasoned, umm, pro's, that can be a little scary. I know, I know, just use your ears blah blah blah...

Now don't get me wrong, I'm no meter freak and unless it has to do with something pretty dang critical (like digital conversion) I usually just use my ears but, and here's the question:

When, if ever, and this assumes said equipment does in fact have metering, do you find yourselves relying on said metering, either LED or VU, of said equipment?

Cheers,

R.
Old 19th May 2003
  #2
Mindreader
 
BevvyB's Avatar
 

******** weather
Old 20th May 2003
  #3
Gear Maniac
 

I rely on my eyes more towards the back end of the session day.
my ears can trick me after 8 or 10 hours
Old 20th May 2003
  #4
Gear Maniac
 
out1ear's Avatar
 

my most used pre's(a custon neve clone) don't have any metering, so I don't really have a choice. I don't mind a little red in protools as long as its not audible....so I listen alot and look a little I guess.
Old 20th May 2003
  #5
Gear Head
 
jbchef's Avatar
 

I still consider myself a newbie in recording (no grammys yet ). I'm very conservative and 'extra careful when setting level. I hear differences when driving my preamp hard, but hard clipping distortion is something I avoid in my signal path. I like aggressive sounding, going over to the red, but I still keep my eye on the level so that it didn't clip in digital.
However, if I also read my manual, trying to figure out when the 'peak' light is on, how much decibel do I have left.

After knowing all the 'rules, I still would refer to my ears. If it didn't 'clip' or colors the sound distastefully, I wouldn't touch the knob.

Moko
Old 20th May 2003
  #6
Deleted User
Guest
Ears first of course, but if you hear any nastiness, meters are helpful for finding which piece of gear is clipping quickly.
Old 20th May 2003
  #7
Lives for gear
 

Meters on gear are great, but I only look at them when something sounds bad. I trust my monitors (Genelec), and the Hardy's have sooo much headroom that they're never the culprit when things crap out. If everything is cal'd at unity gain, then the meters on the tape machine (or ProTools) tell me everything I want to know. As far as editing, I've learned (or been trained like a puppy) to use my eyes these days. DAW's are like that. And it's more efficient to have two senses working than one; though I started with only the sense of sound when cutting tape. Or using the AMS Audiofile for that matter...I digress...
Old 20th May 2003
  #8
Gear Nut
 
stuntmixer's Avatar
 

This speaks to something I have been thinking about recently. I used to mix back into the computer. I could, therefore, see my mixes as they happened. I found that, despite my better judgment, I would make decisions based on what I saw (usually decisions about transients, trying to get more RMS by further treating peaks, etc,)

Now, I mix through a Lucid to a Masterlink so there are only LEDs, and I am a better mixer for it. I guess I found seeing the mix too distracting. I felt obligated to try and make it "look mastered".

I transfered a couple of mixes ifrom the Masterlink into the computer the other day and was amazed to see that they looked great. I had acheived a hotter level and more natural balance of transients vs. RMS without any visual aid (duh, go figure).

Has anyone elso noticed being effected by "seeing" their mixes.


Charles
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearslutz Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.


 
 
Slide to join now Processing…
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Forum Jump
Forum Jump