The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
Psychoacoustic Simultation...Uh Huh...Good for a Laugh
Old 20th November 2009
  #1
Gear Maniac
 
Trancetones's Avatar
 

Psychoacoustic Simultation...Uh Huh...Good for a Laugh

If a judge was skeptical of BlueBeat's "pschoacoustic simulation" argument the first time the company raised it, the passage of time hasn't made the concept any more plausible.
U.S. District Court Judge John Walter in Los Angeles granted the EMI's request for a preliminary injunction banning the music site from continuing to sell Beatles tracks. Walter had earlier issued a temporary restraining order against the site.
The Beatles' catalog has never been available in digital downloads, so many observers, EMI included, were surprised when BlueBeat.com recently began selling the tracks for 25 cents apiece.
BlueBeat CEO Hank Risan insisted that he was entitled to offer the tracks because his company had created them via something called psychoacoustic simulation.
He attempted to define psychoacoustic simulation in his court papers, saying it involved buying Beatles CDs, making one copy each and then having them analyzed "by artistic operators who, employing principles of psychoacoustics and advanced harmonic analysis, synthesized an independent parametric model of the sounds."
The explanation continues: "Positing assumptions as to the location of the microphone and special relationship to the voice and instruments involved in a given recorded performance, the artistic operator then generated and fixed new sounds by selecting new capture points and new source points in a new virtual three dimensional computer-staged environment. The simulation, thus created, contained new and original spherical source point waves."
Walter was unpersuaded: "Risan fails to provide any details or evidence about the 'technological process' that defendants contend was used to create the 'new' recordings, or adequately explain how the 'new' recordings differ in any meaningful way from plaintiffs' recordings," he wrote.
The judge also said that his "musically untrained ear" was "unable to detect or discern any meaningful difference between plaintiffs' recordings and defendants' recordings."
Old 20th November 2009
  #2
Gear Guru
 

love it

it reminds me of the audiophool explanations of how the green flashlight permanently 'treats' your CDs with quantum energy.

Hank Risan should do jail time for perjury unless he can demonstrate how this process works.
Old 20th November 2009
  #3
Gear Nut
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by joeq View Post
love it

it reminds me of the audiophool explanations of how the green flashlight permanently 'treats' your CDs with quantum energy.

Hank Risan should do jail time for perjury unless he can demonstrate how this process works.
"Awww, come on guys, it's so simple maybe you need a refresher course. Heyya! It's all ball bearings nowadays. Now you prepare that Fetzer valve with some 3-in-1 oil and some gauze pads, and I'm gonna need 'bout ten quarts of anti-freeze, preferably Prestone. No, no make that Quaker State."
📝 Reply
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearslutz Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.


 
 
Slide to join now Processing…
🖨️ Show Printable Version
✉️ Email this Page
🔍 Search thread
♾️ Similar Threads
🎙️ View mentioned gear
Forum Jump
Forum Jump