View Single Post
Old 7th February 2009
  #22
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by SFTPH View Post
Your test was flawed from the beginning. The benefit of mixing at 96 or 88.2 is the fact you can RECORD at a higher sampling rate. Recording at 44.1 or 48 and then up- sampling to mix is just plain stupid. Why in the hell would someone purposely do that? Record and mix @ 96k and then down-sample to 48k and mix and there will be a huge-ass-no-contest result.
It was pretty well explained. I guess you missed it.
The tracks were recorded at a lower sample rate then upsampled (arguably a lossless conversion) for mixing.
Many people think there are benefits to giving plug-ins more samples to work with, and the results prove there are definitely differences.

No need to get upset, just listen to the files and take away what you can. *shrug