View Single Post
Old 7th February 2009
  #20
Lives for gear
 

Your test was flawed from the beginning. The benefit of mixing at 96 or 88.2 is the fact you can RECORD at a higher sampling rate. Recording at 44.1 or 48 and then up- sampling to mix is just plain stupid. Why in the hell would someone purposely do that? Record and mix @ 96k and then down-sample to 48k and mix and there will be a huge-ass-no-contest result.