View Single Post
Old 7th February 2009
  #18
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhythminmind View Post
Well here it is

test1.wav = 48k
test2.wav = 96k

I'm torn to pick one I prefer. I like the highs of test1, most likely do to the greater saturation. But the lows of test2.wav. I'm thinking with some re-adjustment of the compression i could recreate the feel of the 96k mix @ 48k.
So i'm thinking having the full 32 channels worth of my SSL duende (only 16 @ 96) will have a greater impact on my sound then mixing @ 96k.
Interesting experiment.
Definitely interesting and cool test! Bit gutted I called the sample rate wrong but I stand by my favourite.
More when you're ready! Maybe a recorded 96 vs 48? although that is tricky to set up.

thumbsup