View Single Post
Old 23rd September 2019
  #1
Lives for gear
 
stixstudios's Avatar
 

What's the difference with these 2 methods using Gain Automation?

I've only had HMB32C for a few weeks and still getting my brain around the way it works. I'm currently mixing a song (20 tracks) that I downloaded to "test" my skills.

Previous to HMB, I was mainly using CoolPro (and an old version of Cubase). CoolPro has basic automation using "Envelopes" where you can easily edit the node points: gain, pan, effects etc.

My standard method to mixing/balancing is to pull up the main tracks: Drums/Bass/Vocals and maybe keys to get an overall view of what the song is about and sounds like.

(1) One option in MixBus, is you go the Editor, then select the "Edit Automation Points" icon. This looks familiar to me and it's easy enough to create and edit the nodes/points which are over-layed on the original tracks waveform. This is what I'm doing atm.

(2) Then there's the other "Automation" where you create an automation lane and "record" in real time, OR you can also draw it in like you can as described above. Great!! But then I got to thinking about the difference in the methods. BTW I'm just referring to "gain" at this point.

The way I'm thinking, is that if I use method (1), then that would be like "pre-trim", whereas option (2) is post??

I'll put it in context (finally ):

I'm using the built in Compressor on a track. So if I use option (1), then that would drive the compressor more - I think - But option (2) would just change the overall level of that track?

The mix sounds nice the way I'm currently doing it (1). I guess my main point of concern is if there may be some ramifications down the road when I start introducing all the other tracks and realise "oh sh*t", I should have done it the other way.

Cheers.

Last edited by stixstudios; 23rd September 2019 at 05:03 PM.. Reason: Other things.