View Single Post
Old 5th November 2016
  #18
Gear Guru
 
drBill's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by NFL View Post
I'm already in an library where they for exclusive, ask for one year.
(got in some songs many years ago)

Can I ask, would that be the idea to be considered fair, for exclusive; either upfront payment and then no sync sharing, and the writers share of the backend, or no upfront, share the sync, keep the writers share of backend, and have a time-limit with reversion option for the track?


Reversion clauses seem to be more prevalent in publishing venues....

As far as exclusive libraries are concerned, I'm not aware of any doing reversion clauses. Perpetuity is the name of the game.

Traditional paradigms - in perpetuity up front buyout of publishing and master rights (no sync sharing), 100% of writers to the writer. There are exceptions.