Quote:
Originally Posted by
surflounge
β‘οΈ
I'm sure it's well made from quality materials (the maintenance kit listed on the website gives a nod to this), looks are non-intrusive and is easy to dismantle and transport, but the cost vs height ratio is very poor (it's only 4 m...which in the context of organ recordings doesn't really qualify as "tall", does it ?)
In post
#12 above Tony Faulkner gives a 3.75m carbon fibre alternative for 75 quid....that's 600 less than the Panamic.
Substitute a K+M round base for the tripod
26200 One-hand microphone stand >>Elegance<< ....there is a problem with the K+M base not being heavy enough however, the Panamic's 7.8 kg (or Tony F's 27kg's !) would be better
Wiki tells: "Carbon fiber can have higher cost than other materials which has been one of the limiting factors of adoption. In a comparison between steel and carbon fiber materials for automotive materials, carbon fiber cost may be 10-12x more expensive. However, this cost premium has gone down over the past decade from estimates of 35x more expensive than steel in the early 2000s"
I suspect Panamic's pricing dates from that era, and needs revision in view of advances and efficiencies in that manufacture industry. I wonder how many of these they sell per year nowadays ?