NAMM 2015: AVID Pro Tools 12 - Page 43 - Gearslutz
The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
NAMM 2015: AVID Pro Tools 12
Old 24th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1261
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pali View Post
Freeze tracks?
Not yet. They're ready to introduce this feature (or, to be more specific, they *could* be ready) but they're intentionally holding back its implementation so that they can release it in several months. This is to help encourage the thought that the subscription plan (which, as they've sold it, facilitates feature updates more frequently) is beneficial to current users. It's smart marketing, if not mind-numbingly greedy.

But from what I've heard, no, it's not going to be in the initial launch. That, among other things, will be included when they feel that it's the most lucrative time to include them.
Old 24th March 2015
  #1262
Is the native track count still 96?
Old 24th March 2015
  #1263
Gear Maniac
 
Oliver.Lucas's Avatar
It's been released today and I would call it yet another insult to the user base. You could hardly call this a .1 increase. Pathetic.
Old 25th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1264
Lives for gear
 
barryjohns's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Oracle View Post
With the amount of alternative plugins on the market at good prices, I think the addition of HEAT is no longer important. I also believe HEAT has to use the AAX DSP and TDM architectures to work. Therefore, I'm not sure Avid would want to invest the time, effort and money to develop a native version.

VCC 2.0 and VTM give me all the warmth I need.
I will never give up Heat!!! Well unless there is an equally good alternative. I refuse to mix without it!
Old 25th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1265
Lives for gear
 
barryjohns's Avatar
 

Avid will wait until the fourth quarter to unload a ton a great features to motivate the HD userbase to HD12.

FWIW, I am an Avid hater right now for their current strategy!
Old 25th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1266
Gear Nut
 
makinghits's Avatar
 

Such a great piece of software, such a crap company behind it. Depressing.
Old 25th March 2015
  #1267
can I use more than 32ios without the hd hardware? I have the hd license and the ssl madi card and converter with 48 ios.
Old 25th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1268
Gear Guru
 
UnderTow's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by everyday View Post
can I use more than 32ios without the hd hardware? I have the hd license and the ssl madi card and converter with 48 ios.
HD|Native can do up to 64 I/O.

http://www.avid.com/US/products/Pro-Tools-HD-Native

Alistair
Old 25th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1269
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderTow View Post
Thank you, Alistair :-)
Old 25th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1270
Here for the gear
 
sadateffendy's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by everyday View Post
can I use more than 32ios without the hd hardware? I have the hd license and the ssl madi card and converter with 48 ios.
Hi, i'm sorry to inform you, protools hd software only without hdx or hdnative card will be limited to 32i/o(ref guide pg.41)
Old 25th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1271
Quote:
Originally Posted by sadateffendy View Post
Hi, i'm sorry to inform you, protools hd software only without hdx or hdnative card will be limited to 32i/o(ref guide pg.41)

Thanks for the info :-). I wondered if pt12 could do this...
Old 25th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1272
Gear Maniac
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Oracle View Post
Please do share your feedback on what you think regarding any new features and stability etc. I'm on HD but I'm holding off for now.

Thanks
There are few new features, stability doesn't seen to be adversely affected.
Old 25th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1273
Lives for gear
Quote:
Originally Posted by [email protected] View Post
There are few new features, stability doesn't seen to be adversely affected.
Thanks Tom. I've been following posts on the DUC forum and articles on PT Expert. There are sure a lot of folks not happy with Avid and PT 12. I've also seen the current full feature list so I'm gonna wait until my Raven is compatible and for more of the "coming soon" features to be released.
Old 25th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1274
Gear Maniac
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Oracle View Post
Thanks Tom. I've been following posts on the DUC forum and articles on PT Expert. There are sure a lot of folks not happy with Avid and PT 12. I've also seen the current full feature list so I'm gonna wait until my Raven is compatible and for more of the "coming soon" features to be released.
"Wait and see" seems to be a popular position right now.
Old 25th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1275
Gear Maniac
 
Oliver.Lucas's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Oracle View Post
Please do share your feedback on what you think regarding any new features and stability etc. I'm on HD but I'm holding off for now.

Thanks
My thoughts on new features:

You can hardly call the number 12 a feature, don't you think?

My thoughts on stability:

How can a new splash screen affect stability
Old 26th March 2015
  #1276
Lives for gear
 
jslevin's Avatar
But HD Native does that using Avid interfaces, no?

I'm pretty sure Pro Tools HD, running with Core Audio i/o, is limited to 32 i/o. I could be wrong, though.
Old 26th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1277
Gear Guru
 
UnderTow's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by jslevin View Post
But HD Native does that using Avid interfaces, no?

I'm pretty sure Pro Tools HD, running with Core Audio i/o, is limited to 32 i/o. I could be wrong, though.
You are correct. 32 I/O with 3rd party interfaces. 64 I/O with HDX or HD|Native.

Alistair
Old 27th March 2015
  #1278
Lives for gear
 
jslevin's Avatar
Thanks for clarifying. Neither is a limitation I would ever worry about. I think the 64 is damned impressive and attractive as a remote option. Secondhand Avid and Digidesign i/o boxes are so cheap these days.

JSL
Old 27th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1279
Gear Guru
 
UnderTow's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by jslevin View Post
Thanks for clarifying. Neither is a limitation I would ever worry about. I think the 64 is damned impressive and attractive as a remote option. Secondhand Avid and Digidesign i/o boxes are so cheap these days.

JSL
Until you compare to the competition. 1400 gets you an RME MADI FX with 194 input and 196 output channels, an onboard 4096 channel zero latency mixer, with 3-band parametric EQ, HPF, AGC, compressor, expander, MS processing and polarity on every channel plus reverb and delay/echo sends. All inputs can be routed and mixed to any (combination of) outputs. Here is a review: HDSPe MADI FX interface | Reviews | Tape Op - the Creative Music Recording Magazine

The HD|Native card looks rather lame in comparison. Even HDX loses much of its luster beside such offerings.

Alistair
Old 27th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1280
Lives for gear
 
jslevin's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderTow View Post
Until you compare to the competition. 1400 gets you an RME MADI FX with 194 input and 196 output channels, an onboard 4096 channel zero latency mixer, with 3-band parametric EQ, HPF, AGC, compressor, expander, MS processing and polarity on every channel plus reverb and delay/echo sends. All inputs can be routed and mixed to any (combination of) outputs.
This is a classic anti-Pro Tools retort: Trot out a bunch of features and channel counts that are irrelevant to the real-world task at hand.

I'm talking about getting comfortably into the 40s in track count without worry about any part of the system, and what I need is a flexible tape machine. I don't need the mixer features. I like RME, but if I really need the feature set you're talking about at some point, I'm not going to be looking at something a lot more robust and not worrying about saving a few dollars.

The review you linked was written by a Cubase user, ferchrissakes.

JSL
Old 27th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1281
Gear Guru
 
UnderTow's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by jslevin View Post
This is a classic anti-Pro Tools retort: Trot out a bunch of features and channel counts that are irrelevant to the real-world task at hand.
And this is the classic Avid apologist's retort: Attack the messenger or the message instead of dealing with the reality of the content.

I am being realistic. If you are impressed by 64 I/O at that price you should be even more impressed by what the competition offers for much less money.

And you are completely wrong. I am not anti-Pro Tools. I own PT HD and earn most of my living with it but, unlike you, I am aware of what the market has to offer. You don't need to use the extra features if you don't need them but they are included.

Quote:
I'm talking about getting comfortably into the 40s in track count without worry about any part of the system, and what I need is a flexible tape machine.
And what makes you think that RME can't offer that? RME will offer you that at a fraction of the price of any Avid solution with IMO _more_ stability than anything Avid have to offer.

Quote:
I don't need the mixer features. I like RME, but if I really need the feature set you're talking about at some point, I'm not going to be looking at something a lot more robust and not worrying about saving a few dollars.
RME is very robust. They are pretty widely recognised as the MOST robust audio interface manufacturer on the market. Much more so than Avid.

Quote:
The above reviewer is a Cubase user, ferchrissakes.

JSL
Really?

Alistair
Old 27th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1282
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oliver.Lucas View Post
My thoughts on new features:

You can hardly call the number 12 a feature, don't you think?

My thoughts on stability:

How can a new splash screen affect stability
How can a new splash screen affect stability

You might be surprised!

Hopefully Pro Tools' code is in better shape than that, but with some code, simply introducing a new graphic can lead to all sorts of other problems...
Old 27th March 2015 | Show parent
  #1283
Lives for gear
 
jslevin's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnderTow View Post
And this is the classic Avid apologist's retort: Attack the messenger or the message instead of dealing with the reality of the content.
I believe I was dealing with the reality of the content. You spat out a bunch of capabilities which, while hypothetically may sound impressive, had nothing to do with the application I had mentioned. (At least as I envision it.)

Quote:
I am being realistic. If you are impressed by 64 I/O at that price you should be even more impressed by what the competition offers for much less money.
All else being equal, yes, of course. That assumes a whole lot of equal, though.

Quote:
You don't need to use the extra features if you don't need them but they are included.
Great, but their inclusion doesn't necessarily have any value to me.

Quote:
And what makes you think that RME can't offer that?
This was referring to the 40-something tracks. Nothing makes me think RME can't offer that, I was just trying to say that going way over 64 tracks has absolutely no value to me. Clarifying my requirements, that's all.

Quote:
RME will offer you that at a fraction of the price of any Avid solution with IMO _more_ stability than anything Avid have to offer.
Quote:
RME is very robust. They are pretty widely recognised as the MOST robust audio interface manufacturer on the market. Much more so than Avid.
This may surprise you, but your subjective opinions about those issues are more meaningful and valuable to me than listing out features that I didn't ask for and don't need.

Quote:
Really?
Ya. Although, to be honest, I couldn't really care less what DAW is used on a location recording. Whatever we already own and/or whatever will be most stable with the computer, OS and interface system. We wouldn't usually record in Pro Tools, but at least in this country, a Cubase user is not someone I can take very seriously to review whether an interface product meets my personal standards for robustness.

In Europe, though, I admit it's kind of a different story. I hear that Cubase, like Hasselhoff, is very big in Germany.

JSL
Old 4th April 2015 | Show parent
  #1284
Lives for gear
 

This might class as trolling (to be honest i'm not sure what trolling is) but I'm stuck on why Pro Tools cost so much My uncle is talking about how great it is and how he has a rig in storage he's about to upgrade. He was speaking but I didn't hear him say anything i couldn't do with another daw and a uad card? Why is Pro Tools something you guys are so happy to pay so much more money for? I get why people pay more for a Mac but Pro Tools? I owned and sold Pro Tools LE some time ago and use Cubase now but then maybe I'm missing something you Pro Tools guys pay the extra cash for since then? I'm curious and want to talk my uncle into going a different route but to be honest I've not used Pro Tools since 2005 so don't know what I'm talking about.

So why would one buy
AVID PRO TOOLS HD NATIVE + HD OMNI Series Interface
Ex. VAT: £3,299.00
£3,958.80

Vs for example

Steinberg Cubase Pro 8 £396.00 (isn't Logic even cheaper?)
M-Audio Axiom 61 Keyboard £205.00
Rode NTK Mic £355.00
K+M 210/9 Mic Stand £37.00
Peluso Popper Stopper £25.00
SE Electronics Reflexion Filter Pro £175.00
Yamaha HS8 Active Studio Monitor White (Pair) £464.00
RME Fireface 802 FireWire and USB Audio Interface £989.00
Native Instruments Komplete 10 Ultimate £729.00
Quiklok Z600 Desk £549.00
Total Ex. VAT £3,269.98
Total Inc. VAT £3,924.00

Go easy on me, I'm genuinely curious why people pay sooo much more, is the system above a dsp system that runs plugs like the uad? I know pro tools runs off the dsp card (or does it if it's native?) but what are the real benefits over Logic, Cubase, Reaper, etc. Are the converters that much better? Loose the £549 desk and a UAD Apollo DUO comes in around the same cost? Why should my uncle invest in Pro Tools again especially when you need to now pay a subscription to run it, if i understand that correctly?

Cheers
Old 5th April 2015
  #1285
@ BobbyLAvenir : that was quite a realistic post I'd say. Avid is completely letting the mid-tier user go to the competition after this. They should rename their software to Post-Tools because that's the only industry that can afford their stuff anyway.
Old 5th April 2015 | Show parent
  #1286
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by diogo_c View Post
@ BobbyLAvenir : that was quite a realistic post I'd say. Avid is completely letting the mid-tier user go to the competition after this. They should rename their software to Post-Tools because that's the only industry that can afford their stuff anyway.
Yes, you are right, maybe they think they can live without this type of users, and focus where the big business is.
Old 15th April 2015 | Show parent
  #1287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick A. View Post
Avid | Pro Tools — Professional Audio Recording and Music Creation Software

This is the "new" feature list of pt12 straight from avid.
All the "new features" say "coming soon". Not sure if that means they are in v12 or not.

I upgraded my iLok from the 9+10 (LE) bundle to the 10+11+12+2016 "perpetual license (protools with support plan)" a few weeks ago for $200. I wasn't aware that I would not ever be able to upgrade past that unless I renewed a subscription license. Doh!

I don't see any difference between 11 and 12, but I don't use it much. I just need it in case someone sends me OMF or AAF or I need to send someone stripes as a PT session. I definitely needed 11+ because I am on Yosemite.

I don't feel cheated, just a bit disheartened that a once great company is in such disarray.
Old 16th April 2015 | Show parent
  #1288
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by diogo_c View Post
@ BobbyLAvenir : that was quite a realistic post I'd say. Avid is completely letting the mid-tier user go to the competition after this. They should rename their software to Post-Tools because that's the only industry that can afford their stuff anyway.
I think the lack of people defending why it costs soooo much says it all
Old 17th April 2015 | Show parent
  #1289
Lives for gear
Quote:
Originally Posted by jweisbin View Post
I don't see any difference between 11 and 12, but I don't use it much. I just need it in case someone sends me OMF or AAF or I need to send someone stripes as a PT session.
Same here. Using Pro Tools to load Media Composer generated AAF-files.

PT HD12 is by far the most underwhelming update I've seen. Where are all the new functions??? Is this a late April's Fool Joke???

It does seem to run a bit smoother in Windows 7, which is good, but it's the last $599 that Avid ever will get from me.


Cheers
Fred
Sound On Sound contributor
Old 17th April 2015 | Show parent
  #1290
Gear Addict
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by frenzy View Post
PT HD12 is by far the most underwhelming update I've seen. Where are all the new functions??? Is this a late April's Fool Joke??
One side effect of AVIDs new subscription model is that they will no longer do "Major" releases (despite this number bump). New features trickle in and are therefore much easier to troubleshoot. You aren't paying $599 for the features in this version of Pro Tools, you are paying for a years worth of Pro Tools features. That's the concept anyway. If you use Pro Tools, get used to it. If you don't like it, use something else.
📝 Reply

Similar Threads

Thread / Thread Starter Replies / Views Last Post
replies: 295 views: 61222
Avatar for anguswoodhead
anguswoodhead 26th March 2013
replies: 15929 views: 1491686
Avatar for Ragan
Ragan 11th January 2019
replies: 25950 views: 2608650
Avatar for 6ixcore
6ixcore 1 minute ago
Topic:
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearslutz Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.


 
 
Slide to join now Processing…
🖨️ Show Printable Version
✉️ Email this Page
🔍 Search thread
🎙️ View mentioned gear
Forum Jump
Forum Jump