![]() |
Izotope = worst upgrade policy. Worst customer loyalty.
I bought MPB 2 and they released MPS a few months later. I emailed them to ask about upgrading and there offer was horrendous. My upgrade offer right now is more than I pad for the entire bundle originally. I won’t be giving them another cent no matter how good their plugs get. This is a buyer’s market. We got loads to choose from. |
Maybe I've just never RTFM to figure it out, but...
Does the relay plug auto-name each instance based on track names or do you have to do that manually? Seems that is a heavy lift for an "automated" process. With 40-60 tracks, that would be quite time consuming given the fact you might not even care for the results. PWG |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Think it should go on master and Relays at start of chain. With that in mind I can't see me using it at all. I record and write everything I do so I really mix to a degree as I go. Going back and muting all effects would seem a backwards step. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also the GUI is very sluggish, it took between 5-10 seconds for the GUI to appear when clicking to open an instance of Neutron. I use a Presonus Faderport 16 and the unresponsiveness affects the Faderport, the scribble strip fails to display track information and it stops communicating with the DAW for a minute or 2. I can't recommend Neutron in this state. YMMV |
Quote:
Thanks for the confirmation! kfhkh |
It's interesting how no one is really addressing the elephant in the room: Sculptor vs Gullfoss.
Neutron's assistant is great and all for quick track balance and channel effects suggestions. But really Neutron still has a thorn in its side, and that is CPU usage. Compare its eq to Fabfilter's Pro-Q all day, but is using it, in the proposed way as CPU efficient as Fabfilter's tools That has been addressed already, and we know that all that eye candy cool aesthetic still come at a huge CPU cost (something Fabfilter had conquered long ago). But people, people... let's talk about some Sculptor vs Gullfoss, please. boing |
Quote:
|
Quote:
product? Second, neural networks (simple and complex) have been a part of "real" AI for decades. |
Quote:
of a complex mix. Sculptor has the advantage that complex eq, compression, exciter, gate, and transient shaping are in N3 and thus very easy to add to the processing. |
Much thanks, consync, for the feedback.
So you think that Gullfoss, if one has Sculptor, is mainly for the overall mix [mixbus], and Sculptor be use liberally among tracks and busses? Also, how well is Neutron doing with multiple instances now? Good for individual tracks or mainly busses? |
Quote:
and use them in tracks/mix bus alone or in combination using a "whatever works" attitude. It is very hard to predict their behavior on one hand, and very fast to test them out, on the other. As far as multiple instances, I am not the best case study, since I never had problems running many instances of N2 (and now N3). Hope this helps. |
Thanks, man.
I'll have to do some testing myself. I just felt some kind of way because I've seen a video of a user having link 3 or 4 instances and their cpu jump up to like 50%. Maybe it was just his machine. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
and while you are technically right that neural networks have been part of real AI for decades—if you re-read what i said, you may note i said "neural networks at this level," not ALL NEURAL NETWORKS—the original reason i mentioned this at all was not to disparage the program, but because the post DIRECTLY PRIOR to mine was saying that at some point in the future, "AI" would probably "generate songs that you love, on the fly," and using Neutron 3 as an example of things heading in that direction. |
Quote:
with running time which is very fast (linear to the time or connections). Once the neural net is trained, running it is very fast even for the most complex NNs and in minimal hardware. Quote:
like and how powerful the hardware will be at that point in time. The complexity of these models may be easily overcome by advances in hardware especially for just raining a trained network, which as I said is very fast. |
i am not confusing training time with running time
EDIT: i know running time is faster but there are still some procedures which take a really long time to run, regardless. none of this really matters. i somehow doubt there will ever be an AI capable of creating 'music you love, on the fly, as you listen to it,' but it's not a hill i want to die on--i was just trying to soothe the worries of a seemingly concerned musician. |
Maybe it’s not what you said but who you said it? I have nearly all the plugins from their production suite and quite a few more, which I’ve paid full price for. Idk.
|
When (usually) are the upgrades on discount?
This upgrades prices are indeed way to high. :( |
Great update, much improved sound and ux!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
As fas as I can see audiodeluxe is the best deal at the moment 134,- dollar. What is the discount izotope is ofering when contacting them? Hmm, loyal? I got neuton advanced from the start and ozone 7 advanced and updated when N2 and O8 came out. Would that be loyal customer? Ooww and I have stutter and trash and there latest vocal processing plug version 3 also updated from version2. And alloy. I guess I am a loyal customer. ������ Edit: email send to Izotope. |
I wish they would just give us a resizable GUI in Neutron 2, I'm not paying 150,- for a bigger GUI.
|
Izotope respond to my message asking for a discount.
They said I was lucky they had a promotion going: 149,- dollar. :facepalm::heh::lol: |
I feel like some of these new features would be better streamlined into a DAW. These plugins are getting so robust that they are starting to feel like a DAW within a DAW. Great ideas here though and it does feel like the "future of mixing". So many interesting ideas coming out these days.
|
You're just not loyal enough :)
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
your dollars (they have to settle for the hypothetical dollars their "discounts" are generating...) |