Quote:
Originally Posted by
DrofDissonance
Hey Jeronimo, I'm curious as to why you are so attracted to the idea of the console running at 96? I would have felt that it would be going overkill, considering the desk is so low end it simply cannot have converters and preamps that are even remotely good. Most midrange interfaces would kill it for converter/preamp quality, it doesn't seem worth it to run the console at that rate if the rest of the chain is so budget.
it just seems to me that if the quality difference between 48->96 is such a big deal to you then you should be complaining more about the low end conversion and preamps
First: we track all our projects at 96khz. So, I would love to have extra inputs at that same sample rate, even at "lower" quality compared to the outboard pre amps we have now (Neve, API, old Neumann and Studer).
Second: most of the stuff I mix (recorded by someone else) is at 44.1... so... another bummer here
Third: having extra DSP (apart from the UADs we have here) at 96khz would be awesome. Again, when doing a bigger recording session, it would be great to have a digital console for extra inputs and for tactile control.
I could be wrong (please correct me) but we have a huge gap (or even a complete lack of) on the studio console market. Analog or Digital.
Either you buy a clean sounding analog console with very limited connectivity or you have to jump to $50k+ (closer to $100k) to get something that is really useful and well integrated with today's studio workflow...