![]() |
zplane.development releases deCoda Software
1 Attachment(s)
zplane.development releases deCoda Software |
So can this detect complex jazz chords? Can it also transpose?
I am self taught and am having trouble remembering older songs I wrote on keyboard since I" don't write music. The detection software I'm using seems to guess more ballpark than precise..... |
oooh, looks interesting, i'd better download a demo this afternoon
|
I think it would be cool if the export loop process would do acidised or warp markers etc..
also can this be run in batches against a load of files? also, is the meta data generated in the 'project' accessible in some way? xml files or something? edit -ok they're 'zvt' files, and the software says it uses sqlite.. i'd like to run this against my many scraps of audio and then (probably using a database) analyze similarities, repeats etc.. Zplane - you could develop this into a huge helper for the millions of us disorganised songwriters.... not just for folk who want to learn a song.. |
This thing is great! And a steal for the best pitch/time algorithms in the game.
|
Quote:
deCoda allows one to name chords manually as follows: maj, min, dim, aug, sus2, sus4, maj7, min7, 7, dim7, hdim7, maj6, min6, 9, maj9, min9 Even in the simplest tests it can't usually detect them itself. I created a 16 bar wave file with each bar being four crotchets of a chord in root position. I used a piano sound and the results were as follows when the velocities were fixed at 72: Chord deCapo's interpretation ----- ----------------------- C maj C C min Eb C dim A dim C aug Ab aug C sus2 Bb C sus4 Bb C maj7 C C min7 Eb C 7 C C dim7 A dim C hdim7 A dim C maj6 A min C min6 A dim C 9 C C maj9 C C min9 Eb With velocities that varied slightly, the results quickly became more inaccurate and with real-world material, it can be very wide of the mark. deCoda has some promise but the harmonic analysis isn't satisfactory at the moment. |
Quote:
Hopefully it will improve but at the moment, it's of very limited use when it comes to transcription (my main interest). One can put a lot of work in and still not have anything of much value. I'll be carrying on using Reaper with plug-ins (and my ears) for analysis and Dorico for the output. If it's really only going to be a tool for facilitating playing along with tracks, then it might mature relatively quickly. |
Quote:
|
Gave it a quick go. Well, let's be honest, with only a 2 minute demo available, a quick go is all anyone's going to get! Anyhoo, threw some Anthrax at it, it did a very good job of detecting the different sections, verses, choruses and so on, and the chord detection was spot on too. Sure, Anthrax don't use any "complex jazz chords" but if I wanted to learn a song quickly, this seems really good.
Having said that, I just tried some Queens of the Stone Age and that wasn't so great with the chords - the choruses threw different results each time. It did detect the different sections very well though but I can do that by ear :heh: But the 2 minute demo is a real ball-ache. Yes, I can reload and carry on but it's kills the excitement somewhat. |
Can the "Parts" at the top be edited? Seems like a no-brainer feature but I haven't found a way to change when they begin and end or add and remove parts. Also, the UI/navigation is very clunky on this. For instance, if I just want to zoom in on a custom range, there doesn't seem to be a good way to do this. Why can't I just zoom in and out of the waveform or a draw a zoom marquee? For instance, it had a hard time recognizing the tempo of a particular song, and it was hard to "draw my own measure" in order to get the tempo re-calibrated because of the zoom restrictions. It would've been easier to just let me first create a custom zoom selection, or place markers at the beat locations.
Otherwise, it works pretty well while being far from perfect. Some things translate very well, others a bit less so, but it'll help get in the ballpark very quickly. |