Quote:
Originally Posted by
Deleted e479b20
... The text really sounds like it's an unsolved problem and having to use denoisers on ADR as been a standard issue in the industry for years that is now finally coming to an end thanks to this new pre... I'm sure it's a great unit and it's user base speaks for itself.
Hi Deleted e479b20,
Thanks for pointing out that, in my attempt to be brief, the text may have been sending a wrong message. I shall edit in hopes it will not appear too outlandish. I'm primarily an engineer but I also serve as the unfortunate, de facto marketing officer. I'm sure a trained, professional PR person would be smirking in amusement when reading my feeble attempts.
But please believe that the text was written with sincerity and relays honest cases. My main area of sound is in music but I've had a long association with post-production folk going back 30 years to the old Hanna-Barbara studios. Many of the enterprise level stages I've been connected with are in legacy facilities or lots which sometimes have limitations in dealing with structural born noises and isolation from industrial strength telecom radiation. Hence the extraordinary measures sometimes found to alleviate these noises.
No single attribute is a magic wand. But when our preamp's HPF is combined with its ultra-low self noise of -131dB and extreme EMI/EMR rejection of 110dB (typically 100 times greater than the usual suspects), well, this adds up to a material improvement. Not all stages are dealing with issues like this. However, on real-world stages which do, the noises had been mitigated enough to allow removal of most or all noise reduction processors. This is a humble but desirable benefit, I think. Less is more.