The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
 Search This Thread  Search This Forum  Search Reviews  Search Gear Database  Search Gear for sale  Search Gearslutz Go Advanced
What is the most stable OS for Pro Tools 10? DAW Software
Old 26th January 2013
Lives for gear
What is the most stable OS for Pro Tools 10?

Is Lion or Mountain Lion faster/more stable with Pro Tools 10 than Snow Leopard? I'm running 10.6.8 and was wondering if there are any advantages to upgrading. I don't use the computer for anything but Pro Tools and downloading files sent to the studio.
Old 26th January 2013
Lives for gear
Joe Porto's Avatar

It may depend on your machine. I have a 2008 Harpertown Pro 8-core. 10.6.8 gives me more tracks at a lower sample buffer than 10.7 or 10.8. This is both with Logic and with Protools HD native. I initially was running PT10HD native on 10.7.2, and wasn't getting the performance I expected. I reverted to 10.6.8 and haven't looked back.

In fact, I have a 10.8.2 partition that I am currently testing with the new UAD 64-bit software, and I can't get it stable under 128 sample buffer, where on 10.6.8, I can run Logic at 32 sample buffer playing back 60 tracks.

Maybe 10.7 and 10.8 are optimized for the newer i5/i7 machines?
Old 26th January 2013
Mac Pro 8-core here
2.33 Dual Quad core 2009
10.6.8 Snow
PT 10.3.3 Native

USB and PCIe interfacing

Old 26th January 2013
Lives for gear
Doc, we have similar set ups (8 core 2.26 Nehalem)

What H/W buffer, host processors, cache size, and CPU useage has given you the best results?
Old 26th January 2013
Buffer changes with workload
I track flawlessly at 64 samples
mix might go up to 1024 (depends on the mix)
7 processors
using 12GB of 16 for disk cache
which is like nothing - and I've got room to grow the sessions huge

I love life
Old 26th January 2013
Lives for gear
So you are using 7 of 16 "virtual processors"

I haven't found the right "combination" yet, but I'll give your set up a go.
Old 26th January 2013
Lives for gear
Joe Porto's Avatar

Adam, like me, is running PTHD, which has disk caching. This allows PT to load the entire project into RAM, and boosts performance significantly. You mention PT10, but not HD. If you do have HD, you should take advantage of Disk Caching.
Mentioned Products
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearslutz Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.

Slide to join now Processing…
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Similar Threads
Thread Starter / Forum
Gear Tramp / Music Computers
Damian Taylor / Music Computers
nativeaudio / So much gear, so little time

Forum Jump
Forum Jump