Quote:
Originally Posted by
musicman691
It matters because I don't but anything based on what someone uses. As a certified old fart I like to know where things come from and/or are based on. I go for certain sounds that I know certain amps can provide. It also matters to me because I've played through most of the commonly known amps out there and I look for that in s/w. I don't just pick an amp out of thin air but what a certain amp can give me.
For instance I know what an amp that uses EL34's in it's output stage will do versus what 6L6's or EL84's. Neural doesn't give that kind of info. Combine that with them designing for artists I've never heard of and well...
What I want to see in s/w is a really great Marshall Plexi emulation. IKMM's emu's suck donkey balls. Or a Magnatone emulation.
Well, Neural Fortin Models, Darkglass, Granophyre and Parallax are clearly modelled after the amps/pedals they take their names of (or very slightly adapted). So I can´t understand the complain for those.
Regarding the Archetypes, at least the Nolly models are publicly known what they are, confirmed by Nolly himself (amp 1 is a Bogner Shiva, amp 2 is a JCM 800 2203 with added bright Switch and Depth control, amp 3 is a Block VH 5150, Amp 4 is a heavily modified to be almost irrecongnizible -sic- Victory).
Regarding the Plini, I think amp 1 is a mix of Fender/Dumble, and the other 2 amps, one is a Friedman and the other one is a mix of Friedman and something else (can´t recall if a 5150 or a JCM800, but you can find out it is out there).
The Cory Wong I think one is a Dumble and the other one involves at least partially a Roland, likely mixed with a Fender, I think.
This might not be 100% accurate (the Nolly is as it was confirmed by himself on facebook), but there you have it if it helps you make up your mind.