SACD engineers: here's how to make an SACD-R for home testing BEFORE glass mastering!
I have been sitting on this info for a while and recently shared it with one engineer working with SACD. He was delighted as he has the same frustration that many SACD masterers have which is that the only way you can normally see how your SACD sounds in the target environment is to send it off (fingers crossed!) to the expensive glass masterer to get a fully produced SACD demo disc (usually at the cost of at least a small run!).
Well here's how to skip the glass masterer and create and play back your own SACD-R outside of the DSD mixing room.
Simply burn the disc image file (created in Superauthor etc) to any type of blank DVD...and the key is, to play it on one of the following SACD players:
Oppo BDP-80
Oppo BDP-83
Oppo BDP-83SE
Denon 2910
Denon 3910
Denon 5910
Sony BDP-S370
Sony BDP-S470
Sony BDP-S570
Sony BDP-S770
[I THINK] Sony SCD-333ES
[I THINK] some old pioneer units, though I have not verified.
The disc will be treated, and played just like a normal SACD. Why? Because these players all have a 'fault' in their design whereby they don't check for pit signal processing.
So there....just grab one of those Denons and you're good to go. There may be other players that also be tricked into playing non-'authorised' SACDs, with some tweaking of how the disc is burnt (like burning with a different block size combined with other tweaks maybe) but I have a Denon 3910 so I haven't taken much interest in going further at this point .
Wish I shared this info with you sooner and I hope it is useful to anyone who works in SACD - and their clients!.
I have been sitting on this info for a while and recently shared it with one engineer working with SACD. He was delighted as he has the same frustration that many SACD masterers have which is that the only way you can normally see how your SACD sounds in the target environment is to send it off (fingers crossed!) to the expensive glass masterer to get a fully produced SACD demo disc (usually at the cost of at least a small run!).
Well here's how to skip the glass masterer and create and play back your own SACD-R outside of the DSD mixing room.
Simply burn the disc image file (created in Superauthor etc) to any type of blank DVD...and the key is, to play it on one of the following SACD players:
Denon 5910
Denon 3910
Denon 2910
I THINK the Sony SCD-333ES
I THINK some old pioneer units, though I have not verified.
The disc will be treated, and played just like a normal SACD. Why? Because these players all have a 'fault' in their design whereby they don't check for pit signal processing.
So there....just grab one of those Denons and you're good to go. There may be other players that also be tricked into playing non-'authorised' SACDs, with some tweaking of how the disc is burnt (like burning with a different block size combined with other tweaks maybe) but I have a Denon 3910 so I haven't taken much interest in going further at this point .
Wish I shared this info with you sooner and I hope it is useful to anyone who works in SACD - and their clients!.
Cheers
Thanks for that, it's very much appreciated! I have a Denon 2910 here and would love to try it. Can you elaborate at how you generate / burn the disc image?
Thanks for that, it's very much appreciated! I have a Denon 2910 here and would love to try it. Can you elaborate at how you generate / burn the disc image?
Take the finalised DDP created by SuperAuthor, and write the image to blank DVD.
Really it seems to work with any type of DVD+/-R/W media, and using any old image burning program like say Imgburn - works fine on my 3910.
Do excuse, I'm a bit new with some of what's happening here - but it seems you can often rename DDP to ISO right? Although in this case the renamed "ISO" may not be openable in most image-reading programs (although it looks like it can in UltraISO, when you load the image into the program!), but you can still just burn the ISO off with again, Imgburn...(or the original DDP directly to data disc if there's software that can do so - like probably gear pro mastering or something)
I bet you would figure out more than me in no time...and I'd appreciate any findings you find too, thanks!
Send me your mailing address via PM and I'll get you something to try...
To the original poster; Thanks for the trick...I'm curious to see if it works here. I have image verification tools (including CMF image playback) so it isn't strictly the 'only way' to test an SACD project but it sure would be handy for clients to check it out.
Best,
Graemme
Quote:
Originally Posted by wado1942
I can't author SACD images (wish I could) but if anybody wants to send me an SACD-R to test in my old Pioneer, I'll gladly get back to you.
To the original poster; Thanks for the trick...I'm curious to see if it works here. I have image verification tools (including CMF image playback) so it isn't strictly the 'only way' to test an SACD project but it sure would be handy for clients to check it out.
ah yes true that. I'm also curious to see whether it's all a success across the board or if there are any kinks with some ways of doing it/some players. Denon seemed to quietly fix the 'problem' with the CI firmware/hardware upgrades and from the next xx30 series onwards. But I would guess that some other ancient models might ignore PSP too...
It honestly is a little surprising that this trick hasn't been discovered until now...
There's all sorts of interesting anomolies/abnormalities when you closely inspect some of the very earliest gear/media of an optical disc format...especially back then when dvd and such enterprising copy protection systems were so new...but only now is this coming out..
I hate to add this at the end of the posts however, What are the specs for SACD? how much dynamic range does it support, how is it much different then a normal master disk?
I hate to add this at the end of the posts however, What are the specs for SACD? how much dynamic range does it support, how is it much different then a normal master disk?
nominally 120dB (versus 96dB for CD's 16bit PCM, and 144dB for 24bit PCM) - although actual performance will indeed vary from this.
Quote:
how is it much different then a normal master disk?
Mainly in the use of DSD rather than PCM, and support for 5.1 surround sound rather than just 2 channel stereo.
It should be noted that SACD can not be replicated off of master discs but must be received by the plant as a data image (generally placed on DLT or FTP'd).
I hate to add this at the end of the posts however, What are the specs for SACD? how much dynamic range does it support, how is it much different then a normal master disk?
i also don't want my thread veering offtrack but since it's mentioned: a great link is: techsacd. lots of rare technical info not compiled to such an extent anywhere else that I've noticed...
i also don't want my thread veering offtrack but since it's mentioned: a great link is: techsacd. lots of rare technical info not compiled to such an extent anywhere else that I've noticed...
I hate to add this at the end of the posts however, What are the specs for SACD? how much dynamic range does it support, how is it much different then a normal master disk?
SACD uses DSD and, although the bit rate is faster than 24/96 LPCM, the SNR is about 28 dB worse. Also, there's heavy low pass filtering which is to protect loudspeakers from the noise that is shaped by this process.
Ideal LPCM converter performance can be determined from the following formula:
SNR = 6.02N + 1.76dB (+ "process gain" created by digital band-limiting. This is computed
with 10log10 (Fs/2•BW), over the bandwidth, BW.)
So, the CD has over 98 dB FPSNR.
The DVD-Audio can have over 148 dB FPSNR.
There is an excellent .pdf on LPCM performance written by Walt Kester for Analog Devices, entitled MT-001 Tutorial.
Also, Walter Jung writes, "For a given signal bandwidth, doubling the [LPCM] sampling frequency increases the SNR by 3 dB."
Many SACD players transcode to PCM before hitting the DAC. Transcoding can be totally transparent to the original DSD, but it begs the question of why bother with DSD in the first place. As on old friend once said, DSD is a solution looking for a problem.
Many SACD players transcode to PCM before hitting the DAC. Transcoding can be totally transparent to the original DSD, but it begs the question of why bother with DSD in the first place. As on old friend once said, DSD is a solution looking for a problem.
Bruno had a quote that I've always liked:
"In terms of practical usefulness it's more like putting the world's population on a spaceship to colonise a new planet without first checking if there's water and oxygen on it, and if the conditions on earth were really so bad we needed to leave it."
--
Many SACD players transcode to PCM before hitting the DAC. Transcoding can be totally transparent to the original DSD, but it begs the question of why bother with DSD in the first place. As on old friend once said, DSD is a solution looking for a problem.
I would see DSD as a good capture system for mixes as a replacement for 1/2" (or 1/4") analog or lesser WAV or AIFF files. No need for processing in DSD, but as a nice playback system for the ME using analog gear anyway.
I would see DSD as a good capture system for mixes as a replacement for 1/2" (or 1/4") analog or lesser WAV or AIFF files. No need for processing in DSD, but as a nice playback system for the ME using analog gear anyway.
This absolutely makes the most sense to me as well. I have very limited experience with DSD but a couple of folks whose ears I trust have stated numerous times that they definitely love it just for the purpose you describe. I would invest in something like the Korg MR2000S in a heart beat as a playback transport if I just simply had a client who actually ever wanted to provide me with a reasonable amount of work from DSD. To date I've never gotten even a single inquiry as to whether I can work from DSD though!
Yeah - compare this to near daily inquiries as to whether I can cut lacquers. For which I just got a Fairchild lathe which hopefully I'll have restored in a few months. So if the inquiries come I do indeed take action.
I would love to work in DSD or DXD, never even had an opportunity to listen to it. If you want to encourage the format is not worth while if and only if a client pays for a standard master to maybe give him a free version of the same song in DSD one time offer? Just to get people enticed about the format?
My pc is Vaio VGN-AW290, equipped with "DSD Direct® Player"
Here is more info :
DSD Direct Player
this is important "Not only can you listen to SA-CDs and enjoy their superior sound quality, but you can also record your own DSD discs"
My pc is Vaio VGN-AW290, equipped with DSD Direct Player ... "Not only can you listen to SA-CDs and enjoy their superior sound quality, but you can also record your own DSD discs"
DSD is in its place in one (1) application: Mastering from analogue. When the recording chain is completely analogue, you can feed the audio from the analogue mastering into a DSD A/D converter and cut that signal straight onto a disc without any further processing. It is in this application that DSD can be viewed as pretty transparent. When you convert the signal twice, however (such as when using a DSD recorder as the tracking medium), the second conversion is no longer transparent, due to the HF noise present in the source signal hitting a second analogue deltasigma modulator.