The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
 Search This Thread  Search This Forum  Search Reviews  Search Gear Database  Search Gear for sale  Search Gearslutz Go Advanced
Balance Analog Magpha EQ Dynamics Plugins
Old 5 days ago
  #61
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP__ View Post
Do you have artist names in your invoices or just real names...?

Heres a band of whom I mastered the both latest albums, mixed by a fairly reputated engineer. One was mixed quite dry, the other rather wet with heavy saturation/distortion. For both my mastering approach was quite similar, still results are quite different of course. So, Im not really sure what to achieve from those examples...?
YouTube
It's About Time - YouTube

I with you, knowing more about each other in this forum definitly helps, this is where fb maybe worse a look.
To solve this issue, I do a kind of "shazam session" every 3 to 6 months with unlabelled project.
It's very fun to do and sometimes you get nice surprise like : the files "rt-to be_mix - v03b_07-02.wav" has actually more than 3 000 000 streams on Spotify.
Old 5 days ago
  #62
Lives for gear
 
teebaum's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP__ View Post
Do you have artist names in your invoices or just real names...?
in 98% - both
Old 5 days ago
  #63
Lives for gear
 
JP__'s Avatar
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by teebaum View Post
in 98% - both
Interesting, I nearly never. CD text or rarely getting a facebook link is all info I get mostly.
I also do a fair amount of vinyl only stuff, where an artist/project name or even an online link is rare.

Last edited by JP__; 5 days ago at 05:42 PM..
Old 5 days ago
  #64
Lives for gear
 
JP__'s Avatar
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saxnscratch View Post
To solve this issue, I do a kind of "shazam session" every 3 to 6 months with unlabelled project.
It's very fun to do and sometimes you get nice surprise like : the files "rt-to be_mix - v03b_07-02.wav" has actually more than 3 000 000 streams on Spotify.
Haha. How cool is that.
Old 5 days ago
  #65
Lives for gear
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP__ View Post
As a not native speaker I havent got a clue whats your questions is about.
Sorry! Yeah it means "too long to talk about"
Old 5 days ago
  #66
Gear Head
 
biksonije's Avatar
 

@MaGpha: I have a quqestion regarding slider on each band, Stereo <-> MS Mode.

How does user (I haven't tried it yet but I intend to so please bear with me here...) chooses to work on each band either in Stereo Mode, Mid Mode or the Side Mode? I can't tell from this screenshot whether the slider "cicks" to Stereo when pushed far Left, then "clicks" again to Mid and finally "clicks" to Side Mode when pushed all the way to the right? Or is it something else going on here?

Guys, I know, many of you can say: Go download and try! Right? I will try it but... Maybe someone is online and will explain before I jump into download and testing some time tomorrow or the next day. Depends on my job and every day activities.

Thnx all!

Krešo
Old 5 days ago
  #67
Lives for gear
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP__ View Post
But is far to busy to write it down then, I understand...
no it's a friendly British term, not a humble brag at all..
Old 5 days ago
  #68
Lives for gear
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by teebaum View Post
come on, look through your bills and collect the coolest projects - needs an evening. i'm also on it right now, should be worth it in the medium term.
if i don't know what to think of a statement on GZ, i like to go and see what the writer has done and listen to his work - so i quickly get an idea of his aesthetics.

the main reason for such a list is of course that potential future customers can get a picture of my work and I can refer to it for testmastering requests.

we're veering into a different topic entirely here I think?

I don't think as a mastering engineer I have an aesthetic, just a brain and some tools and make decisions people seem to like.

Maybe aesthetic is just the wrong term, in a literal sense.

My credits (somewhat out of date) are on my site (in my sig) if you are interested though. I know I'm always clicking on folks links here just out of interest.
Old 5 days ago
  #69
Lives for gear
 
teebaum's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_caithness View Post
we're veering into a different topic entirely here I think?

I don't think as a mastering engineer I have an aesthetic, just a brain and some tools and make decisions people seem to like.
self-perception is much more difficult than external perception - that's why masteringengineers are needed.
Old 5 days ago
  #70
Lives for gear
 
JP__'s Avatar
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_caithness View Post
no it's a friendly British term, not a humble brag at all..
Making a bolt statement, but show no will to explain it looks not so friendly to me, in a way. To me a forum is not a facebook post, its about interaction. Im very interested in your opinion, but just posting one liners helps nobody, thought.
Old 4 days ago
  #71
Lives for gear
 
b0se's Avatar
Been travelling and missed this release, very nice sounding EQ.

Just missed the intro though, a shame, would have pulled the trigger at that price as it's nice to have alternatives (Equilibrium).
Old 4 days ago
  #72
Gear Maniac
Purchased. The interface works brilliantly with my Nob Control. Dialling in the right results is a breeze. The combo certainly feels "analog" in operation.
Old 4 days ago
  #73
Lives for gear
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP__ View Post
Making a bolt statement, but show no will to explain it looks not so friendly to me, in a way. To me a forum is not a facebook post, its about interaction. Im very interested in your opinion, but just posting one liners helps nobody, thought.
Honestly no offence is meant.

All I am saying is that your question, with respect, is not worth engaging with as we would be arguing the subjective.

Either way, we're getting way off here, the plug-in is pretty cool but I have some reservations about its interface.
Old 4 days ago
  #74
Gear Head
 
balancemastering's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by biksonije View Post
How does user chooses to work on each band either in Stereo Mode, Mid Mode or the Side Mode? I can't tell from this screenshot whether the slider "cicks" to Stereo when pushed far Left, then...
Yes the slider clicks left for stereo, middle for mid, and right for side mode, for each band
Old 4 days ago
  #75
Gear Head
 
biksonije's Avatar
 

Aha, now everything makes sense!

Thank you!

Krešo
Old 4 days ago
  #76
Gear Head
 
balancemastering's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_caithness View Post
Finally found time to properly sit down with this EQ.


Pros

- Made by an indie engineer in the field not a developer "crossing over to mastering" and you can tell by the interface and layout
- Love the idea of colour digital EQ and I think it's gonna be a big thing in years to come. You're on the right path!


Cons

- One shelf is not enough, gimme some to cut and boost at the same time
- Gives me a bit of a headache squinting at it still, as much as I appreciate the minimalism
- Steps are not in 0.25 or whatever dBs

Ideas

- Would be nice to see the band is engaged on the knob itself, hard to keep track when you have a few engaged
- If it's steps, maybe steps which match up to a usual mastering workflow


Honestly I couldn't get to a setting I liked anything close to Slick EQ ME because of the interface, but from what I can tell it sounds pretty decent and could turn into something really special.

Hi Joe thanks for taking the time to check it out.

I like the idea of seeing the band is engaged in the knob itself. That would really help workflow. Watch this space!

You're the first person to suggest more shelves, I'm not sure I'd want to make the interface busier than it is, and I'm not a huge fan of multi-purpose bands personally. But I'd never say never.

RE: the stepping. I chose the steps out of personal preference. I like 6dB as it's approx twice/half amplitude. So everything is halved doubled from there. It might be possible to formulate a user option so they can choose that scheme or the 1, 0.5, 0.25 etc. scheme you describe.

I agree that more text sizes would be useful to help the squinting factor.


Thanks again really appreciate the feedback, John
Old 4 days ago
  #77
Lives for gear
 
JP__'s Avatar
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe_caithness View Post
Honestly no offence is meant.

All I am saying is that your question, with respect, is not worth engaging with as we would be arguing the subjective.

Either way, we're getting way off here, the plug-in is pretty cool but I have some reservations about its interface.
Alright. So you just was misleaded by its name: "Analog Magpha EQ" which might remind on that one million "analog" emulations out there..
Happy I was able to help.
Old 4 days ago
  #78
Gear Head
 
balancemastering's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by audiomaster View Post
Purchased. The interface works brilliantly with my Nob Control. Dialling in the right results is a breeze. The combo certainly feels "analog" in operation.
Great! I didn't know it worked with that piece of gear.
Old 4 days ago
  #79
Lives for gear
 
JP__'s Avatar
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by balancemastering View Post
Hi Joe thanks for taking the time to check it out.

I like the idea of seeing the band is engaged in the knob itself. That would really help workflow. Watch this space!

You' re the first person to suggest more shelves, I'm not sure I'd want to make the interface busier than it is, and I'm not a huge fan of multi-purpose bands personally. But I'd never say never.

RE: the stepping. I chose the steps out of personal preference. I like 6dB as it's approx twice/half amplitude. So everything is halved doubled from there. It might be possible to formulate a user option so they can choose that scheme or the 1, 0.5, 0.25 etc. scheme you describe.

I agree that more text sizes would be useful to help the squinting factor.


Thanks again really appreciate the feedback, John
Im very good with those uncommon steps. Might lock strange at first look, but makes sense while working.
Old 4 days ago
  #80
Lives for gear
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by balancemastering View Post
Hi Joe thanks for taking the time to check it out.

I like the idea of seeing the band is engaged in the knob itself. That would really help workflow. Watch this space!

You're the first person to suggest more shelves, I'm not sure I'd want to make the interface busier than it is, and I'm not a huge fan of multi-purpose bands personally. But I'd never say never.

RE: the stepping. I chose the steps out of personal preference. I like 6dB as it's approx twice/half amplitude. So everything is halved doubled from there. It might be possible to formulate a user option so they can choose that scheme or the 1, 0.5, 0.25 etc. scheme you describe.

I agree that more text sizes would be useful to help the squinting factor.


Thanks again really appreciate the feedback, John
Cheers John and good luck with it
Old 4 days ago
  #81
Lives for gear
 

Verified Member
Quote:
Originally Posted by JP__ View Post
Alright. So you just was misleaded by its name: "Analog Magpha EQ" which might remind on that one million "analog" emulations out there..
Happy I was able to help.
I wasn't misled at all, I just have a different subjective opinion, it's really not worth debating.
Old 3 days ago
  #82
Lives for gear
 
b0se's Avatar
Blimey this EQ is good. The more I've used it the more I'm becoming attached to it. So smooth and musical.

Under 1ms latency and CPU efficient also.
Old 3 days ago
  #83
Gear Head
 
balancemastering's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by b0se View Post
Blimey this EQ is good. The more I've used it the more I'm becoming attached to it. So smooth and musical.

Under 1ms latency and CPU efficient also.
Thanks for the kind words b0se.

P.s. We’ve just released a brand new kind of EQ, the gearslutz thread is here if anyone wants to check it...

Balance Spread Focus EQ – New EQ to 'spread' or 'focus' frequencies
Old 1 day ago
  #84
Gear Maniac
Maybe an option to solo each band?
Old 1 day ago
  #85
Lives for gear
 

I might be this still trying to weigh it against equilibrium which is my go too. This is pretty great eq definitely worth owning. What is the price in US dollars?
Old 7 hours ago
  #86
Lives for gear
 
b0se's Avatar
Had to buy this, pretty much an instant fave. Great when paired with a character preamp (Nebula) too.

Usability feature request

While I'm a big fan of minimal design, and enjoy the GUI, it doesn't give an 'intuitive' overview as well as it could. Everything being the same grey (regardless of active/inactive, dots, txt and lines) makes it difficult at a glance. A tiny mod—green dot for an active band—changes that...



Easier to see where the dials are. Agreed that it's about sound, but visual feedback (especially when reviewing) is handy for some, and very helpful for others. Original for comparison - note how you have to 'search' harder to find the adjustments...



Please consider adding this as an option :¬)

Update: A 50% fade on inactive bands really helps (and looks sexy!). Could call that Focus Mode or something. Very clear to see what's engaged/used.

Old 5 hours ago
  #87
Gear Maniac
 
whippoorwill's Avatar
these suggestions above are great, a 50% fade would be more welcome than a coloured dot. One other thing - a button to rearrange the bands by ascending frequency would be incredibly useful (I wonder if TDR have the patent on that).
It's so simple and beautiful as it is though, it really doesn't need to change much.
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearslutz Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.


 
 
Slide to join now Processing…
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Forum Jump
Forum Jump