Quote:
Originally Posted by
herecomesyourman
➡️
...an LA2A adds some harmonic distortion, but it's not a fuzz box.
It is if you crank it, the LA-2a produces gorgeous fuzz, white hot but smooth! You'll likely need some kind of pad afterwards, the output will be insanely hot as a result of the amount of drive added.
To the OP's question, the main difference for me between LA-2a and 3a is that the former is pillowy and adds air and classic tube overtones, the latter is gritty and adds classic solid state grunge. Also, the 3a is very versatile, where the 2a is widely applicable but it has one primary color and two varieties of tastefully restrained leveling.
I've got a review of the new UAD LA-2a plugs coming into print soon (yup), suffice to say that the new gen of plugs are a) awesome, and b) not at all identical to the hardware, neither in tone nor in transient impact/detail, and I've got ample sound clips to demonstrate the differences.
"Very LA-2a-ish" is the way to describe the plugs, a degree of proximity that's in line with every other high quality emulation of high end hardware that's dropped in the past 3-4 years.
If I were OP and my choices were LA-2a and LA-3a, I'd get the former, because it's easier to get sweeter results with less understanding of the nuances of compression. 'Foolproof' is a valuable trait in most situations.
Gregory Scott - ubk