Quote:
Originally Posted by
wwittman
In this instance, i can say I feel more or less EXACTLY opposite to Fletcher!
I would take an 8078 over any of them, but I would vastly prefer the sound of an 8068 over a 9098, even though I hate the rotary inline monitor and three band eq, a LOT.
for me, unless I knew I simply needed the number of inputs for mixing that the 9098 provided, it would be an easy choice for the discrete Neve.
but the bottom line is that if you're seriously purchasing a $200,000 desk, the opinions of OTHERS (unless they are your actual, direct, potential or known clients) really shouldn't enter into it
surely, before you drop that kind of money, you know what YOU like?
Hi
If they were unmodded, as they left the factory, I would take an 8068 over an 8078. Sure, an 8078 has 4 band EQ, 24 busses, etc., but it was also crawling with silly design flaws...
The optos that switch mic and line... grossly overdriven so they burn out and levels drift. The fix is a resistor change but I have seen famous/infamous/notorious Neve console modders fit trim pots to try and trim out the error... a real band-aid fix.
The loopy way of getting a 4T bus from the 24 bus selection buttons was a recipe for feedback for the unknowing...
The monitor/mixdown section has barely 16dB headroom because of the cheap design of the monitor routing module. If you pull back the master fader on the mix bus on a hot mix... you will get clipping once past -15dB.
And the buffers for the quad faders were over compensated so that the response could be several dB down at 20KHz.
This won't apply to the 8078 at Blackbird, or Thresholds ex Sony, or a couple of 78's in LA because I sorted out the sillyness... but none of those foibles exist in the 8058/68.