I can definitely see why people like number two better - even though my bias runs the other way. Number two has a nice romantic softness to it - and you're not so distracted by being aware of the mechanical noises of the piano like in number one. Perhaps it's just a better match for 'sensitivity humps' of that particular microphone with the piano. I think that a lot of the 'blurrier' mics out there are preferred because, even though they are not as 'articulate' - they create a sort of 'assonance' where none existed before... by emphasizing some frequencies and not others... well... I guess that's all rather obvious... but I had to think through it in writing...
I really do like #2 better because of the balance... I don't know the tube-mics from Neumann... so I can't tell which is which... please send me an pm. thanks!
Hello, Didier! The first mic is more suitable for a piano, it is more detailed with a quick response, the second does not have time to process the details making them blurry (because of this perceived as more artistic), also cuts off the high frequencies. If the topic is still working, I would be glad to know who is who. Thank you!
i am wondering because:
- on notebook speakers 2 sounded nicer and wider (dsp working there for sure)
- on a good headphones 1 sounded clearer and less low mid boomy