Quote:
Originally Posted by
Behrmoog
Sorry, why only 5 votes? This is ridiculous today and for this price (and the 10 is also too expensive).
Why those stupid patch numbers? I don't like having to write down numbers with patch names.
I know it should be a reissue (if it was Behringer it was called clone) but I think practical and simpel.
best regards
It's a Prophet 5. Made with the creator of the Prophet 5. As a new version of the Prophet 5, not a clone (can't be a clone when a new version that isn't identical is done by the same company, let alone the same creator being involved). Ergo, it's one of the "legendary" analog synthesizers by a legendary synthesizer designer, made for professional musicians (and collectors).
It can't be cheap to have designed, sourced, manufactured, warehoused, and delivered to resellers.
The market is clearly willing to pay this, especially given the price of the ancient synths from the 80s.
I have 2 analog synths by different companies, and neither show the names of patches. If you spend time with your instrument and create and organize the patches yourself, it's really not an issue. Or, if I care, all I do is start up the PC editor app/plugin. Easy.