The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
New polyend sampler
Old 6 days ago
  #481
Lives for gear
 
gentleclockdivid's Avatar
 

Also on 3.2 here
Could you be more specific what exactly it is you're having trouble with ,
Midi timing , clock , hung notes , double notes etc..?
Everything works perfectly well over here

Maybe give a shout to taktik and see if he can help , renoise is one of the most stable programs out there when it comes to midi .
Old 6 days ago
  #482
Gear Nut
 

Could some possibly change the name of this thread to: Polyend Tracker ?

I feel having it titled polyend sampler is giving people the wrong idea about this thing and causing everyone to compare it to other samplers and what features this lacks compared to them. The focus of this thing is it's tracker and how it's integrated with it's sample based sound engine. If someone was just looking for a sampler there'd be better options out there I'm sure.
Old 6 days ago
  #483
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petajaja View Post
Could some possibly change the name of this thread to: Polyend Tracker ?

I feel having it titled polyend sampler is giving people the wrong idea about this thing and causing everyone to compare it to other samplers and what features this lacks compared to them. The focus of this thing is it's tracker and how it's integrated with it's sample based sound engine. If someone was just looking for a sampler there'd be better options out there I'm sure.
The title is fine since this IS a sampler as well.
Old 6 days ago
  #484
Gear Nut
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by marcgood View Post
The title is fine since this IS a sampler as well.
Yeah but the name of the product is "Polyend Tracker" And I'm sure there was a reason they chose that name, I see so many people coming in here and talk this down because it hasn't got all the features of ____ And I feel like those people are missing the point. It's a shame to be hurting small companies with stuff like that especially during these hard times.
Old 6 days ago
  #485
Gear Addict
Gets excited to read new posts and realises its some pedantic GS waffling on about the name
Old 6 days ago
  #486
Gear Nut
 

Lmao so sorry I got your hopes up.

If you want up to date news I recommend joining the tracker group on Facebook, the newest info in regards to this is they're still on schedule for June or sooner and bogdan raczynski has one and will be posting demos of it.
Old 6 days ago
  #487
Gear Addict
Cheers Petajaja will do
Old 6 days ago
  #488
Lives for gear
 
enossified's Avatar
Slightly OT here, but can someone explain what makes a tracker different than just using a MIDI sequencer event list? I've never been able to get my head around the concept.
Old 6 days ago
  #489
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by enossified View Post
Slightly OT here, but can someone explain what makes a tracker different than just using a MIDI sequencer event list? I've never been able to get my head around the concept.
Very little.
There is a serious misconception of what a tracker is, in the first instance it is tied entirely to the audio engine for micro editing and easy channel switching to save polyphony (the Amiga only had/has 4 note hardware polyphony) this was to create simple fully encapsulated real time playback files for building in to games, MIDI was an afterthought in trackers, not it's primary goal or even its best use case, in fact MIDI in a game file was a hindrance because it would need to trigger something, using resources not available back in those days (Yes musicians ran with it and used external hardware etc, besides the point)
In the second instance it is assumed by many here that trackers where first and foremost software, again this is not the case at all, trackers first and foremost where originally a hardware device, they used the 4 note polyphonic sample playback built in to the Amiga hardware, this was a hardware engine not a software audio engine.

So take it like this, this tracker versus original tracker (Amiga hardware, not software) is actually quite an upgrade, this tracker versus second generation trackers (Bypass on board audio hardware for extra polyphony) is a little upgrade, this tracker versus all out software trackers, be it 486 DOS through PDA through to modern computers is a huge downgrade.

Weigh all that up before considering this product either way.
If this sells well, there will be a LOT of these on ebay not too long after they go on sale, a lot of people are expecting something that this is not.
I would suggest trying any tracker software before even considering this product, to say tracking is a very specific user type is no exaggeration, you love it or hate it, there is very little middle ground.
Old 6 days ago
  #490
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bungle View Post
V
Weigh all that up before considering this product either way.
If this sells well, there will be a LOT of these on ebay not too long after they go on sale, a lot of people are expecting something that this is not.
I would suggest trying any tracker software before even considering this product, to say tracking is a very specific user type is no exaggeration, you love it or hate it, there is very little middle ground.
being sure of what you're getting is always great advice, but just out of curiosity what is it that you think people are thinking this is that it isn't, loop's video seemed concise enough Imo, and there aren't that many features yet although thee might be late but... what is it that you think people are expecting or not getting?
Old 5 days ago
  #491
Lives for gear
 
jiffybox's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derp View Post
Thanks for namedropping them. Hadn't heard of that before and am really digging their tracks, especially Lusine.
Ghostly is one of the bet labels out there and Lusine has influenced and informed my music for well over a decade now. His first Ghostly album is masterful.
Old 5 days ago
  #492
Lives for gear
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain 8 View Post
being sure of what you're getting is always great advice, but just out of curiosity what is it that you think people are thinking this is that it isn't, loop's video seemed concise enough Imo, and there aren't that many features yet although thee might be late but... what is it that you think people are expecting or not getting?
Yeah, the whole "be careful it's a tracker" dance here is just stupid. You can record sequences in realtime like any other sequencer worth its salt, and there is a performance mode that has absolutely nothing to do with trackers. It's its own thing.

The way it handles polyphony is a bit weird, but I wish the digitakt could actually do that for instance, instead of requiring an external device for that purpose.

All hardware sequencers have their advantages and shortcomings, it's a matter of asking oneself if they can live with the shortcomings.
Old 5 days ago
  #493
Lives for gear
 

All semantic nonsense aside, it’s a sequencer. Simple as that.
Old 5 days ago
  #494
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by camus2 View Post
Yeah, the whole "be careful it's a tracker" dance here is just stupid. You can record sequences in realtime like any other sequencer worth its salt, and there is a performance mode that has absolutely nothing to do with trackers. It's its own thing.

The way it handles polyphony is a bit weird, but I wish the digitakt could actually do that for instance, instead of requiring an external device for that purpose.

All hardware sequencers have their advantages and shortcomings, it's a matter of asking oneself if they can live with the shortcomings.
if you can't record those performance features into the sequencer that would be a shame though
Old 5 days ago
  #495
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain 8 View Post
being sure of what you're getting is always great advice, but just out of curiosity what is it that you think people are thinking this is that it isn't, loop's video seemed concise enough Imo, and there aren't that many features yet although thee might be late but... what is it that you think people are expecting or not getting?
People keep asking about MIDI sequencing for example, if you want a good MIDI sequencer look elsewhere "If i play a seven note chord I will be out of tracks" look elsewhere, they should havd given this a dual boot mode and have the option to boot in to AROS and call it Amiga X or something, for anybody trying to get back some feeling of the old days, this thing is cheaper than a quality Amiga set up after refurb and recapping etc.
Old 5 days ago
  #496
Lives for gear
 
ArtFluids's Avatar
You won't be able to handle the restrictions
Old 5 days ago
  #497
Gear Addict
It could work well with Blackbox. Like BB is great at (very quickly) getting a track up and running but not so good thereafter (ie sequencing/automation of bits etc). So if something else is a feeder then maybe this tracker would be great at taking those loops into another place and something more complete as a composition. The 8 track thing is a limitation tho
Old 5 days ago
  #498
Here for the gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by akai_world View Post
fiddly fckin thing....severe lack of support...useless community (the most active thread is one asking where each other lives)...a sort of arrogance from the developer with a 'take what your given attitude'. I have a whole list of basic, like really basic things that need implementing. Overall I struggle to get creative with it (compared to the OP-1), its more you get what you put in sort of device and lacks any happy accidents.
This post is very misleading. Black box has excellent support! The device is constantly being updated and has an extremely active forum/group. If you have a question and someone in the group doesn’t answer, someone from 1010music will reply swiftly.
Old 5 days ago
  #499
Gear Addict
Quote:
Originally Posted by Adison View Post
This post is very misleading. Black box has excellent support! The device is constantly being updated and has an extremely active forum/group. If you have a question and someone in the group doesn’t answer, someone from 1010music will reply swiftly.
Equally misleading. If you call a minor update to the file structure every 8 weeks a constant update then great. Ask a question on the forum and its not responsive at all - however the facebook group i agree is better.
Old 5 days ago
  #500
Lives for gear
 
enossified's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bungle View Post
Very little.
There is a serious misconception of what a tracker is, in the first instance it is tied entirely to the audio engine for micro editing and easy channel switching to save polyphony (the Amiga only had/has 4 note hardware polyphony) this was to create simple fully encapsulated real time playback files for building in to games

Thanks Bungle!

I understand that. I actually worked on an ancient PC (Ohio Scientific?) that had a DAC that could be addressed by machine code. As a senior project my lab partner and I wrote a bunch of programs that played specific melodies via the DAC. Talk about prehistoric. Sounds like those early Amiga trackers were a lot easier to use



I've used MIDI event list editing for decades, in both hardware and software for fine tuning sequences beyond the basic cut/paste/quantize functions found in early sequencers. Anybody out there ever used Dr. T's KCS that ran on the Commodore C64 and other early computers? That's what trackers always reminded me of when I'd see pictures.



The Yamaha Motif event editor...no piano roll available.

New polyend sampler-screen-shot-2020-03-24-12.05.11-pm.png
Attached Thumbnails
New polyend sampler-screen-shot-2020-03-24-12.05.11-pm.png  
Old 5 days ago
  #501
Lives for gear
 
jbuonacc's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by enossified View Post
... Anybody out there ever used Dr. T's KCS that ran on the Commodore C64 and other early computers? That's what trackers always reminded me of when I'd see pictures.

along with the Alesis MMT-8, an Atari ST running Dr. T’s KCS was my first serious MIDI sequencer. after that i used Cubase on an Atari Falcon030, then an Akai MPC2000XL.

while they look similar, there’s not really too much in common with a tracker and a list editor. in some ways, but not exactly.
Old 5 days ago
  #502
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by enossified View Post
Thanks Bungle!

I understand that. I actually worked on an ancient PC (Ohio Scientific?) that had a DAC that could be addressed by machine code. As a senior project my lab partner and I wrote a bunch of programs that played specific melodies via the DAC. Talk about prehistoric. Sounds like those early Amiga trackers were a lot easier to use



I've used MIDI event list editing for decades, in both hardware and software for fine tuning sequences beyond the basic cut/paste/quantize functions found in early sequencers. Anybody out there ever used Dr. T's KCS that ran on the Commodore C64 and other early computers? That's what trackers always reminded me of when I'd see pictures.



The Yamaha Motif event editor...no piano roll available.

Yes they are basically the same, however, a tracker is a rolling time based list with events, again in the first instance a tracker is tied to the audio engine, so it will have a lot of microediting commands specifically for audio.
A MIDI list editor is generally not a rolling time based list with events, but a list of events with timing information per event.
Old 5 days ago
  #503
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by enossified View Post
Thanks Bungle!

I understand that. I actually worked on an ancient PC (Ohio Scientific?) that had a DAC that could be addressed by machine code. As a senior project my lab partner and I wrote a bunch of programs that played specific melodies via the DAC. Talk about prehistoric. Sounds like those early Amiga trackers were a lot easier to use



I've used MIDI event list editing for decades, in both hardware and software for fine tuning sequences beyond the basic cut/paste/quantize functions found in early sequencers. Anybody out there ever used Dr. T's KCS that ran on the Commodore C64 and other early computers? That's what trackers always reminded me of when I'd see pictures.



The Yamaha Motif event editor...no piano roll available.

Working with a tracker and a midi event list are totally different things. The former is a very efficient and satisfying way of writing music while the latter sucks for the purpose.
Old 4 days ago
  #504
Lives for gear
 

the more or maybe the less you might say that I see of the Polyend Tracker I'm coming to the conclusion that simply everything has to be automatable !!! Everything!.....and there has to be a complete sampling chop shop in the unit at this price, and those pads have to be able to play keys/scales etc... and the performance mode has to be recordable into the sequencer. It would still be a nice piece without these things but there is a difference between something being nice and being useful worth the price.
Old 3 days ago
  #505
Lives for gear
 
Cornish1999's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian N View Post
I'm a huge fan of his solo work but most of his electronic stuff sounds like 1992 and very average at that
What’s wrong with 1992!
Old 3 days ago
  #506
Lives for gear
 
Sebastian N's Avatar
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cornish1999 View Post
What’s wrong with 1992!
Nothing. in the context of frusciante being a beacon of futuristic electronic music,

1999 is better (obviously)
Old 2 days ago
  #507
Lives for gear
 
Cornish1999's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian N View Post
Nothing. in the context of frusciante being a beacon of futuristic electronic music,

1999 is better (obviously)
Thanks for the clarification

Joking aside , I was a really surprised to hear how frusciante had got so into trackers, 303’s and breakcore. I was a big fan of early RHCP and At first I thought it was wind up. Challenged my view of pigeon holing musicians. Talented guy.
Old 2 days ago
  #508
Lives for gear
 
Sebastian N's Avatar
 

frusciante is an amazing musician. but i think i read in one of those rare interviews that when he got into electronic music he got into early acid house and idm so his influences and reference is clearly set in a specific time period. also he doesn't go out clubbing so the latest styles kinda fly over as many styles need to be heard on a proper sound system to completely get the vibe
Old 2 days ago
  #509
Gear Head
 

So... what exactly is a tracker?
Old 2 days ago
  #510
Lives for gear
 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Dairy View Post
So... what exactly is a tracker?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_tracker
Topic:
Post Reply

Welcome to the Gearslutz Pro Audio Community!

Registration benefits include:
  • The ability to reply to and create new discussions
  • Access to members-only giveaways & competitions
  • Interact with VIP industry experts in our guest Q&As
  • Access to members-only sub forum discussions
  • Access to members-only Chat Room
  • Get INSTANT ACCESS to the world's best private pro audio Classifieds for only USD $20/year
  • Promote your eBay auctions and Reverb.com listings for free
  • Remove this message!
You need an account to post a reply. Create a username and password below and an account will be created and your post entered.


 
 
Slide to join now Processing…
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Forum Jump
Forum Jump