Quote:
Originally Posted by
akajuan
Yeah I saw that and thought it was very interesting. I never considered their distribution network was more expansive than other manufacturers as always thought it would depend on local distributors deciding to buy stock or not. Perhaps because the products are more affordable and the risk is lower these distributors are more willing to import B products, so it may be more a consequence of B's vision than a direct policy. Pure speculation, not really sure how this works.
However, if your distribution power is much higher than others in your industry, the natural thing to do would be offering distribution services for other companies instead of..... Regardless of that discussion, there is no denying that B are making possible for many people to access musical equipment. I hope they (or the AI computer running it) get their balance right.
well not to get into
THAT as we have seen enough but no i disagree, if i/you/they made the effort to get to a certain place why help others to get there with your networks? makes no sense in a business world - maybe in some utopia and once you have gained massive market share you might help out but still, also maybe the competition don't want help getting there and after analysis (which i presume they have completed) they don't think see it as a viable market for them and their P and L, nothing wrong with that
so far as behringer are concerned that is their goal, always has been, people can believe it or not but they do aim for costs where possible that almost anybody can meet, with that brings its own issues we know but they have to be commended for reaching such places that others don't - are behringer like heineken then?