The No.1 Website for Pro Audio
Roland SP series comparison
Old 12th June 2015
  #1
Gear Nut
 
🎧 5 years
Roland SP series comparison

There are the Roland SP202/303/404/505/555/606/808/808ex

What are all their differences, asides from memory/recording specs?
What models have which unique features?
If I understand correctly, the 808EX is the 'top of the line' model but it's not necessarily the "best" in everything.

If I wanted to only buy one of these, which one should it be and why?
I like cool sequencing tricks, live performance oriented controls and sample mangling. Not looking for an MPC alternative, looking for a fun and quirky sampler with a unique sound that integrates nicely into a live setup
Old 12th June 2015
  #2
Lives for gear
 
robotunes's Avatar
 
🎧 10 years
sp808 lover here. none of these have cool sequencing tricks or live performance oriented controls. they are mpc alternatives.

investigate the korg volca sample, the korg esx, korg electribe sampler, casio xw-pd1, and -- for all this to the extreme and beyond -- the octatrack.




Old 12th June 2015
  #3
Lives for gear
 
DJRAZZ's Avatar
 
🎧 5 years
Well some are newer with SD cards. Some make better groove machines. Other are better loop samplers. My FAV to date is the SP-404SX.
Old 13th June 2015
  #4
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Among the SP samplers, if I'm not mistaken, the 555 has a unique feature not present in the others and that is pattern resampling/pattern capture. This is one thing I'd love to have in my SP-606. Speaking of which, I like the 606 a lot, especially the dual effect blocks. It's also cool to have the d-beams aboard - only present on the 606, 555 and 808 units.

A unique feature in the 404sx is uncompressed sampling.
Old 20th November 2015
  #5
Here for the gear
 
🎧 5 years
I don't know what robotunes is talking about but if you got an Roland s.p. as a m.p.c. alternative then you'll be very disappointed.

SP's are made for live performance, thought none of them could be the
center of your setup 'cause they have very simple sequencers.

SP's are basically efx boxes that woke-up one day and decided to
be sampler/sequencers. some
of them are more at home in
the studio than others but it would be
difficult to make it your
main production box and isn't worth trying unless you really love
its sound.

I made a some comparisons here for readers



The Roland/Boss SP Series of Table Top Samplers

1) Roland MS-1 Digital Sampler: 1995/95
HTML Code:
can't find info
2) Roland SP-808 GrooveSampler: 1998
HTML Code:
Specifications
    Polyphony - 4 Stereo Voices
    Sampler - 44.1kHz and 32kHz sample-rates, holds up to 1,024 samples (16 pads x 64 banks)
    Sequencer - 64 songs, 2000 events per song
    Filter - Filter effect: lowpass resonant, low boost; Isolator effect: isolate hi, mid or low bands
    Effects - GrooveSampler: 99 preset patches, 99 user patches; e-Studio: 25 algorithms, 149 preset patches, 149 user patches
    Memory - 100 MB Zip Drive 
    Keyboard - None, 16 touch pads (not velocity sensitive)
    Control - MIDI IN/OUT, MMC, MTC, MIDI Clock
3) Boss SP-202 Dr. Sample: 2000
HTML Code:
Specifications
Polyphony - 4 voices
Oscillators - None
Sampler - 31.25kHz (hi-fi), 15.63kHz (standard), 7.81kHz (lo-fi), 3.91kHz (lo-fi 2); 32 to 260 seconds
Sequencer - None
Effects - Pitch, Filter, Resonant Filter, Time stretch, Ring Modulator, Delay
Memory - Holds 16 samples; offline storage to SmartMedia 5.5v Memory Card
Keyboard - None, 8 touch pads (not velocity sensitive)
Control - MIDI
4) Roland SP-808 e-Studio: 2000
HTML Code:
 Specifications
    Polyphony - 4 Stereo Voices
    Sampler - 44.1kHz and 32kHz sample-rates, holds up to 1,024 samples (16 pads x 64 banks)
    Sequencer - 64 songs, 2000 events per song
    Filter - Filter effect: lowpass resonant, low boost; Isolator effect: isolate hi, mid or low bands
    Effects - GrooveSampler: 99 preset patches, 99 user patches; e-Studio: 25 algorithms, 149 preset patches, 149 user patches
    Memory - 100 MB Zip Drive (250 MB in e-Mix Studio)
    Keyboard - None 16 rubber touch pads (not velocity sensitive)
    Control - MIDI IN/OUT, MMC, MTC, MIDI Clock
5) Boss SP-303 Dr. sample: 2001
HTML Code:
Specifications
Polyphony - 8 voices
Oscillators - None
Sampler - 44.1 kHz (standard), 22.05 kHz (long), 11.025 kHz (lo-fi); 31 seconds to 202 min
Sequencer - None
Effects - 26 effects including Filter + Drive, Pitch, Delay, Vinyl Sim, Isolator, Reverb, Tape Echo (+19 more!)
Memory - 32 samples (16 intern, 16 SmartMedia 3.3V Card); up to 112 samples backup
Keyboard - none 8 touch pads (not velocity sensitive) 
Control - MIDI IN
6) Boss SP-505 Groove Sampling Workstation: 2002
HTML Code:
Specifications
Polyphony - 8 notes
Multitimbral - MIDI 1-part, Sequencer 4-parts
Sampler - Stereo sampler with 4MB Internal memory (from 2 min to 17 min). External memory cards of 8MB to 128MB (up to 64 min sampling at 44.1 or 395min at 11.025 kHz)
Sample Rate -
Standard: 44.1 kHz
Long: 22.05 kHz
Lo-fi: 11.025 kHz
Effects - 26 DSP effects including Filter + Drive, Pitch, Delay, Vinyl Sim, Isolator, Reverb, Tape Echo (+19 more!)
Sequencer - 4-Track sequencer
Patterns - 40 preset patterns, 100 user patterns
Songs - 20 Songs
Keyboard - none 16 rubber pads (not velocity sensitive)
Memory - Internal memory: 250 samples (16 banks); 64 onboard Tones; External Card memory: 256 samples (16 banks)
Control - MIDI IN/OUT
7) Roland SP-606 Sampling Workstation: 2004
HTML Code:
Specifications 
Polyphony - 8 voices 
Oscillators - None 
Sampler - 44.1 kHz (standard), 22.05 kHz (long), 11.025 kHz (lo-fi)
Sequencer - Notes: 18,000, Tracks: 4, Songs: 25, Patterns: 140, Song Steps: 999, Resolution:                                       	         96   PPQ  
Effects - 45 x Multi-Effect Types 1 x 2-Band Master Compressor
Memory - 16MB internal – up to 512 MB on optional cf card.
Keyboard – 16 velocity sensitive touch pads 
Control - MIDI IN/OUT, USB, MMC, MTC, MIDI Clock
8) Roland SP-404 Sampling Workstation: 2005
HTML Code:
can't find info
9) Roland SP-404 SXLinear Wave Sampler: 2009
HTML Code:
Specifications 
Polyphony - 12 voices 
Oscillators - None 
Sampler - 44.1 kHz (standard), 22.05 kHz (long), 11.025 kHz (lo-fi)
Sequencer - Maximum recordable notes: Approx. 16,000 notes, Resolution: 96 ticks per quarter     	         note, Pattern Length: 1-99 measures, Recording method: Realtime Loop Recording  	         (with shuffle quantize function)
Effects - 45 x Multi-Effect Types 1 x 2-Band Master Compressor
Memory - up to 32GB SDHC.
Keyboard – none 12  touch pads (not velocity sensitive)
Control - MIDI IN/OUT, MMC, MTC, MIDI Clock
10) Roland SP-555 Sampling Workstation: 2010
HTML Code:
Specifications 
Polyphony - 12 voices 
Oscillators - None 
Sampler - 44.1 kHz (standard), 22.05 kHz (long), 11.025 kHz (lo-fi)
Sequencer - Maximum recordable notes: Approx. 16,000 notes, Resolution: 96 ticks per quarter     	         note, Pattern Length: 1-99 measures, Recording method: Realtime Loop Recording  	         (with shuffle quantize function)
Effects - 45 x Multi-Effect Types 1 x 2-Band Master Compressor
Memory – 32 MB internal up to 32GB SDHC.
Keyboard – none 16  touch pads with velocity sensitivity
Control - MIDI IN/OUT, USB, MMC, MTC, MIDI Clock
the 808 is not the best sp but it is cool, being a mini hard-disk recorder and all.
sp's come in two flavors, "display" and "mark button"


sp-808, sp-808ex, sp-505 and sp-606 are all "display models" meaning they all have a wave edit display. these are the ones with menu diving.


sp-202, sp-303, sp-404, sp-404sx and sp-555 all have the "Mark button" instead of a display, your supposed to sample with these by ear.

the 606 and the 555 are both weirdo's in-so-much-as the 555 is a 404sx that's missing some key features but can be a usb audio and midi interface.

606 is a 505 missing some features but can also be a be a usb audio and midi interface.

now you can sit at your desk and make a beat completely with just some vinyl
and anyone of these boxes but they are made to be on stage triggering
simple loops filtered through efx. so don't be surprised at the lack of depth in the sequencer and polyphony. also only the 555 can sample its own patterns!!

I keep 2 sp's, a 606 and a 505 just to bounce patters between.

to understand the attraction to the Roland/Boss SP-Sampler series you have to know what an SP
is: just enough midi/sequencing to get by as a sequencer,
just enough audio routing to be a sampler.. but an effects engine beast. consequently where SP's
fail you as a sampler you have to make up for those failing with the effects. it forces a lot of
creativity out of you.

almost all of its weakness have a workaround involving the efx's,
for instance: you can't resample a pattern on any sp except
the 555. real bummer for a sampler with only 8 voices of mono.
how does one over come this limitation?......with the effects!

the 606 can resample its delay buffer: if the wet and the echo
are all the way up you can get a whole bar of a sequence in
there---basically a one bar, lofi, pattern resample.

need a bass tone on a sample but can't find one you like?,
load the oscillator effect in one effect slot and the envelope
effect in the other, now you have a synth.

need 16 levels but it doesn't exist on your sp? just resample
the sound triggered 16 times through the pitch effect as you
twist the knob, then auto-chop that pad to a new pad bank.

these boxes are great but they are not mpc's and should not
be thought of as one.

Last edited by MrThraz; 20th November 2015 at 05:21 AM.. Reason: format correction
Old 20th November 2015
  #6
Gear Nut
 
🎧 5 years
Don't forget the VA monosynth in the SP808.

See: https://www.gearslutz.com/board/10730121-post29.html
Old 20th November 2015
  #7
Lives for gear
 
Sclr's Avatar
 
🎧 5 years
Sequencing is definitely not the strong point of the sp line i agree with that. I thought the 555 was supposed to be a sort of step up from the 404sx. The 555 has a buffer sampling feature thats pretty useful and rad. It all depends on what your work flow is or where you want it to be. You could do a whole album with any of them but if you want sequencing tricks i'd say look elsewhere. performance wise imo the 555 is the best of them. You can basically 'play' the effects section of it and do some neat tricks with your samples and triggering. I think these shine in the looping of your samples. Then its like MrThraz said its gonna take some creativity on your end and tricks with the effects to get the best out of em.
Old 20th November 2015
  #8
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Since the OP doesn't seem to be looking for some kind of perfect-drum-machine-with-crystal-clear-sound . . .

. . . I would recommend checklng out the 606. The two effects processors are not hi-fi but there is something dubby and pleasing about them, they have character, and you can do a lot of sonic alteration (and then re-sample the result). There is also a mastering compressor that is musically useful.

The weirdest live performance feature is being able to use the d-beam as a kind of super-primitive theremin, (you can play a little monosynth by moving your hand).

There is a serviceable 4-track sequencer--But you only have 8 (!) voices of total polyphony available, (4 voice with stereo samples), so see if that's a limit for you. The clock and sequencer are accurate and can be set in tenths of a BPM if you want. To my ear, the lossy sample format doesn't have great attack or high end, but it's certainly usable. As said in previous posts, you use the effects to help the sound.

iirc you basically can't retune a sample on the 606, which is maddening. There is a pitch shifter effect, but resampling through the pitch shifter never worked for me.

------
I have not owned a 555 but it can record and overdub audio loops on the fly, and that seems like a sexy feature.



-----
Main thing about an SP: Don't pay a lot, get a big card for it, and don't expect too much. Think of it like a sometimes interesting, sometimes annoyingly quirky friend.

Last edited by percussion boy; 20th November 2015 at 09:59 AM..
Old 4th March 2016 | Show parent
  #9
Gear Nut
 
vromber's Avatar
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrThraz ➑️
10) Roland SP-555 Sampling Workstation: 2010
HTML Code:
Specifications 
Polyphony - 12 voices 
Oscillators - None 
Sampler - 44.1 kHz (standard), 22.05 kHz (long), 11.025 kHz (lo-fi)
Sequencer - Maximum recordable notes: Approx. 16,000 notes, Resolution: 96 ticks per quarter     	         note, Pattern Length: 1-99 measures, Recording method: Realtime Loop Recording  	         (with shuffle quantize function)
Effects - 45 x Multi-Effect Types 1 x 2-Band Master Compressor
Memory – 32 MB internal up to [B]32GB SDHC[/B].
Keyboard – none 16  touch pads with velocity sensitivity
Control - MIDI IN/OUT, USB, MMC, MTC, MIDI Clock
"32GB SDHC" - looks like a mistake.
Roland states that max. capacity is 2GB of CompactFlash.

Or now it`s possible to use 32GB?
Old 5th March 2016 | Show parent
  #10
Here for the gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by vromber ➑️
"32GB SDHC" - looks like a mistake.
Roland states that max. capacity is 2GB of CompactFlash.

Or now it`s possible to use 32GB?
sorry my mistake, i had to put some of these together myself. i mixed up the 555 and 404sx.
Old 21st May 2017
  #11
Here for the gear
 
gus give your lights i have 808 and the only pure is fantasy,you can do it all but with differents ways example dont loop track but with 2 moves has 99patterns copy paste and so you have loop you know if i can use 8 track with some way at roland sp 808 and no 4?because on says 1/2 3/4 /5/6 7/8 and mono left right or something?if this is possible is the best machine,because 4 track is little,i find a ways for example i write a track then with mark i sent to pad and then i mix it and i have all form of mixing and then resampling final form and if something dont like i have and before forms,and if i can plan tracks with software and midi,plz reply only if you know because i was quest if you can put ADSR in samples and all says no and one guy told me how you can and finally has,thanks aaaa and if you can plan tracks with synth pattern sequencer.thanks soz for my bad english i hope you understood the points
Old 21st May 2017
  #12
ff0
Gear Nut
 
🎧 5 years
None of these offer live recording, or at least live recording without stopping playback though, no?...
Old 21st May 2017
  #13
Gear Maniac
I have been performing live with two SP 404s as my core sequencers since 2007.

You don't think that is smart?

Tell that to Madlib, J. Dilla and Animal Collective.....not to mention every local electronic oriented band I've ever seen.

Sorry, I just think all the comments about them being toys are a little misleading.

Sure they aren't in vogue for REAL dance music producers....or whatever...but nothing is until someone everyone likes starts making cool stuff with one.

404s are powerful and dirt cheap. I ONLY use mine as a sequencer. Kinda funny how we all think differently.
Old 21st May 2017
  #14
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
This video makes me relax relax for some reason.....i bought one after this.Love the disk recording system with the resampling using the faders.Very creative.Using a SP404 now.Got 'the sound' imo.A bit brighter than the 303 which i actually like.

Old 22nd May 2017
  #15
Gear Addict
 
Having owned and used MPC's with SP samplers, I'd recommend picking up a Pioneer SP-16. I'd do all my sample mangling in the SP303 and then sample it into the MPC3000 for sequencing.

Now I do it all in the SP16 and it's awesome.
Old 22nd May 2017 | Show parent
  #16
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coleman Young ➑️
Having owned and used MPC's with SP samplers, I'd recommend picking up a Pioneer SP-16. I'd do all my sample mangling in the SP303 and then sample it into the MPC3000 for sequencing.

Now I do it all in the SP16 and it's awesome.
Only used it in the shop a few times but sounds a bit harsh to my ears.Very high quality but i did not hear any softness there.Need more time with it tho.Sampling ect....
Old 22nd May 2017 | Show parent
  #17
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Songtalk ➑️
I have been performing live with two SP 404s as my core sequencers since 2007.

You don't think that is smart?

Tell that to Madlib, J. Dilla and Animal Collective.....not to mention every local electronic oriented band I've ever seen.

Sorry, I just think all the comments about them being toys are a little misleading.

Sure they aren't in vogue for REAL dance music producers....or whatever...but nothing is until someone everyone likes starts making cool stuff with one.

404s are powerful and dirt cheap. I ONLY use mine as a sequencer. Kinda funny how we all think differently.
was watching this ras g live set again the other day because of this thread. really cool!

Old 22nd May 2017 | Show parent
  #18
Gear Addict
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goa-Dubs ➑️
Only used it in the shop a few times but sounds a bit harsh to my ears.Very high quality but i did not hear any softness there.Need more time with it tho.Sampling ect....
If you've used it in a shop, then you haven't actually heard it.

You've heard the really crap stock samples that shipped with the unit. Once you start using your own sample library or sample vinyl records it's a completely different box. The SP303 and the MPC3000 went into retirement after I had it for a week.

The resampling with effects feature on the SP16 kills the SP303.
Old 22nd May 2017 | Show parent
  #19
Lives for gear
 
🎧 5 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coleman Young ➑️
If you've used it in a shop, then you haven't actually heard it.

You've heard the really crap stock samples that shipped with the unit. Once you start using your own sample library or sample vinyl records it's a completely different box. The SP303 and the MPC3000 went into retirement after I had it for a week.

The resampling with effects feature on the SP16 kills the SP303.
but what about the great vinyl sim comp? and the lofi stuff? is there something comparable in the sp16?
Old 22nd May 2017 | Show parent
  #20
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coleman Young ➑️
If you've used it in a shop, then you haven't actually heard it.

You've heard the really crap stock samples that shipped with the unit. Once you start using your own sample library or sample vinyl records it's a completely different box. The SP303 and the MPC3000 went into retirement after I had it for a week.

The resampling with effects feature on the SP16 kills the SP303.
Thats great to know.Personally i get tired of using one machine for all tasks.And enjoy the various characteristics (traits and personality) of different machines in the the mix.Of course.

Quote:
404s are powerful and dirt cheap.
There going up in price every day...

Quote:
I ONLY use mine as a sequencer. Kinda funny how we all think differently.
Check out the quality of the sound.Has a very nice texture.How do you work with it as a sequencer.Its pretty simple so should be a quick answer " ]
Old 22nd May 2017 | Show parent
  #21
Gear Maniac
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coleman Young ➑️
If you've used it in a shop, then you haven't actually heard it.

You've heard the really crap stock samples that shipped with the unit. Once you start using your own sample library or sample vinyl records it's a completely different box. The SP303 and the MPC3000 went into retirement after I had it for a week.

The resampling with effects feature on the SP16 kills the SP303.


You can definitely resample with effects on the old 404 and I'm pretty sure the 303 but maybe not I guess.....
@ Goa-Dubs

I record loops of each instrument doing different parts of a song onto pads and then chop them to length. Build up the whole track in the pattern sequencer. Intro, verse, verse 2.0, chorus, bigger chorus, bridge, jam etc. If I can plan ahead and sequence it, I can add it to the song.

With liberal use of the quantize feature and fine tuning the start and end points of your samples and a little patience, you can get nice and musical transitions.

The pattern sequencer keeps everything neat and slaves effects to the same BPM for all loops which is very nice especially for looper, delay and other effects you might want to add to multiple samples/loops simultaneously. I also like being able to go back and forth from one part to the next more or less hands free so I can comp on keyboard/guitar.

The end.
Old 22nd May 2017 | Show parent
  #22
Lives for gear
 
🎧 10 years
Quote:
Originally Posted by Songtalk ➑️
You can definitely resample with effects on the old 404 and I'm pretty sure the 303 but maybe not I guess.....
@ Goa-Dubs

I record loops of each instrument doing different parts of a song onto pads and then chop them to length. Build up the whole track in the pattern sequencer. Intro, verse, verse 2.0, chorus, bigger chorus, bridge, jam etc. If I can plan ahead and sequence it, I can add it to the song.

With liberal use of the quantize feature and fine tuning the start and end points of your samples and a little patience, you can get nice and musical transitions.

The pattern sequencer keeps everything neat and slaves effects to the same BPM for all loops which is very nice especially for looper, delay and other effects you might want to add to multiple samples/loops simultaneously. I also like being able to go back and forth from one part to the next more or less hands free so I can comp on keyboard/guitar.

The end.
Been meaning to check out the sequencer more with the bpm sync ectect.Ive been using it for 1 shots and resampling various pads with fx ect with no BPM.Its kinda cool in a random free way but feel the need to explore its finer aspects lol.
Old 23rd May 2018
  #23
Here for the gear
Recently I found that the Boss SP-202 was released on 1996.
=)
πŸ“ Reply

Similar Threads

Thread / Thread Starter Replies / Views Last Post
replies: 19 views: 15507
Avatar for Heads High Ent.
Heads High Ent. 21st June 2010
replies: 119 views: 26885
Avatar for killa ego
killa ego 16th February 2013
replies: 38 views: 8121
Avatar for ZipSnipe
ZipSnipe 9th October 2019
replies: 9 views: 7241
Avatar for Perplexo
Perplexo 15th May 2018
Topic:

Forum Jump
Forum Jump