![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mp3 recorder help... | Marlowe | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 14th January 2006 11:38 AM |
| mix1 -> mix2 -> ? | loke | Work in progress / advice requested / Show & Tell / Artist showcase | 2 | 14th March 2005 04:00 PM |
| Converting to Mp3 | yphs_mst | Music computers | 1 | 19th January 2005 04:09 PM |
| all i want mp3 | JSMITH | Work in progress / advice requested / Show & Tell / Artist showcase | 4 | 24th July 2004 05:42 PM |
| just let it be.mp3 | gracejames | Work in progress / advice requested / Show & Tell / Artist showcase | 0 | 24th March 2004 07:56 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 18
| Please advise!, Mix1.mp3 or Mix2.mp3 Hi, I am mixing a little classical guitar number for my friend. I have done two mixes. Please tell me which you prefer and why (classical1.mp3 or classical2.mp3). http://www.grantsv.eclipse.co.uk/mix1/ Thanks for your help, GrantsV |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 154
| I'll give it a try ... Mix 1 has more hyped bass part of spectrum(tube mic(s) or relative close miking?) and seems more compressed; mix 2 sounds more natural to my ears(frequency balance). However, mix 2 seems to have too much ambience, mix 1 is better in this regard. Both recordings are a bit noisy(venue was noisy at the time of recording, perhaps?), and Mix 2 seems to have slight bell-tree like modulation in background(noise reduction side effect?) I would try not to use master compression, if possible. Cheers! |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |