Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Audio file upload / Interviews / Podcasts / Video Vault / Links > Work In Progress / Advice Requested / Show & Tell / Artist Showcase / Mix-Offs


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th August 2010   #1
Gear interested
 
Billy Maddox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Rapture
Posts: 6

Thread Starter
Help with making mix sound fatter

Hello, I'm in dire need of help! My mix sounds thin and empty, and my band is getting mad at me. I'm thinking it has to do with the bad distortion from the guitars, but it doesn't help when they insist on recording with the insane channel on a Line6 Spider III. I've tried everything that I can think of (with the exception of listening to my band mates: apparently cranking the bass will fix it and not make the mix sound muddy). Any help would be appreciated!
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 Yellow Pajama's.mp3 (2.86 MB, 1340 views)
Billy Maddox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2010   #2
Gear maniac
 
Barney1981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 152

Hi Billy

What have you recorded the mix on? I would be happy to have a little go a remixing the track if you have all the audio files in the project mix. I will then give you a breakdown of what I did and see if you like the new mix.
PM me if you are interested, I will do it for free of course .

The main problem is the stereo imaging of the track, there is far too much focus down the middle, leaving the track with no depth and making it sound too thin.

I agree the Line 6 insane channel is not ideal as it can be a bit noisy and overbearing but you can still get decent results from the mix.
Barney1981 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th August 2010   #3
Gear Head
 
Mordae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Finland
Posts: 49

Send a message via MSN to Mordae Send a message via Skype™ to Mordae
I'd start with giving guitars more low end and smoothing the top a bit.
You could also pan the guitars at around 50% on both sides to create a wider stereo field.

Also, try to add compression to everything. This should make your mix louder.
Last, add a limiter to the post effects.

And tell your band mates to shut up
Mordae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th August 2010   #4
Gear interested
 
Billy Maddox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Rapture
Posts: 6

Thread Starter
Thanks for all of the replies! Though, I've already done most of the stuff suggested and that's my result. It's really heavily compressed (like, more than I care to compress) and for stereo imagining I have it set at (negative left, positive right):

-64 Rhythm Guitar
-48 Rhythm Guitar
-32 Lead Guitar
-16 Lead Guitar
-10 Bass
0 Vox
10 Bass
16 Lead Guitar
32 Lead Guitar
48 Rhythm Guitar
64 Rhythm Guitar

and drums are...

-48 Overhead Left
-32 Floor Tom
-16 Left Tom
-10 Snare
0 Kick
10 Snare
16 Right Tom
48 Overhead Right
(I have the toms panned to the drummers sitting position as opposed to the audiences perspective but he's left handed so it sorta works both ways)

Barney1981, I recorded the tracks through a Tascam US-1641 and onto Logic Pro 9. If you wanted to give mixing them a shot and then explain what you did that would be awesome!! I'm still in the process of learning how to do this so any help would be appreciated! Just let me know the easiest way of sending you the tracks.

EDIT: 64 is as deep as you can pan them.

Last edited by Billy Maddox; 29th August 2010 at 03:22 AM.. Reason: adding info.
Billy Maddox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st September 2010   #5
Gear nut
 
chris.holtmeier's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 139

Sounds very center-panned to me. I'm on Logic as well, so if you want to send the tracks and project file (Dropbox works for this), I'll see what I can do and send the new project file your way.
chris.holtmeier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2010   #6
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 27

What about going for a more "in-my-face" snare sound?

What about putting a lot of a short reverb on the snare, and boost low frequencies so you can feel it crack more? A very short room verb to widen the snare sound, while still keeping it up front.
CubeCity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2010   #7
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 18

I'd ignore the guy who said add low end to the guitar you recorded.. that'll just make it muddy.


First I'd say the distortion you have is bad. You distorted it too much on the tracking. You don't need the same distortion when you record as you would live. It just doesn't sound good. If you turn the distortion back it will help make guitars more clear and end up a fatter sound when you follow this next piece of advice:

If you didn't double track I'd go back and do that.
The simplest way would be 57 the amp and record each part twice. Pan them hard left and right. Then leave the center for bass, vocals, kick, snare, etc..
This will free up alot of space in your mix for those elements, and it will help you achieve a "fat" sounding mix. Everything you listen to is achieved with methods similar to this. Some people even like doing more than double tracking (some to a ridiculous extreme). You could record 4 takes and pan hard left, left, right, hard right. Note this only works well if your guitarist can play the riff several times and be very accurate each time. If not it will sound washy.

Another thing is make sure you have a good guitar tone when you record it instead of being a revisionist about it with EQ.

Also, if you want to do anything to clear mud, you should do a small cut to guitars around 100 or 200 khz to free up some space for the bass. It sounds muddy because you have too much low end already.. and really thin high end.

Also when you do this, take the opportunity to turn the drums up. They are too low compared to the guitar. A good general rule of thumb is drums and vocals should seem the loudest, followed by guitar and then by bass. Alot of this can be achieved through compression rather than just pushing the volume knob around too much. For harder music compression is the way to go anyway.


It also sounds you're not 100% on EQ frequencies anyway, so this is a good website that may help bring some light to it in a simple way: http://www.recordingwebsite.com/articles/eqprimer.php

good luck
toypajme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2010   #8
Gear addict
 
lettenmusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: WI
Posts: 400

sounds like there are some phase issues going on. Start over, take off all effects, and check for phase issues.
lettenmusic is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
making a mix more hi-fi baskervils So much gear, so little time! 6 31st July 2010 06:25 PM
Whis pre is smoother/fatter the OSA MP1-c or Chameleon Labs 7602? heisleyamor So much gear, so little time! 4 28th November 2008 09:12 PM
Making something sound like its Underwater? MKR Post Production forum! 26 31st October 2007 05:42 PM
Am I drunk? My PCM70 sounds fatter vs. my 300! SiliconAudioLab High end 2 21st November 2004 12:27 AM
recording 24bit @ 44.1khz sounding fatter with more bass compared to 24 bit @ 48khz w JOHN High end 3 14th October 2003 02:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:05 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.