![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2007 Location: Alabama
Posts: 950
Thread Starter | Last edited by Fishmed; 4th December 2007 at 02:32 PM.. Reason: Added new link |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Banned Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 565
|
You may have some monitoring issues here. Are you mixing in a small room?? You have a huge black hole in the mid bass region= around 100hz to 700hz Small rooms tend to have alot of build up in that area. Dont really know what to tell ya. Re-access your monitors and mix room. Look into some Basstraps. Try adding another pair of monitors with smaller bass drivers, like 5 or 6 inches. They tend to be more truthful in the mid lows than 8, 10 inches and bigger. I had a similar issue as yours when i was using Mackie HR824's in a 12x12 room. I switched to ADAMS with a 6 inch driver, and am now in a room 16x20 with a few basstraps. A HUGE WORLD of difference. Other issues i hear would be, the slap bass tone. Just not good. Bad tone. Sounds very dated. The cymbals seem on the cibilant side to me as well. Again, just generally sounds like you scooped the mid range out of everything, and that just doesnt work. The brian and phillip clip on your site suffers the same big hole. The clips posted that have no drums or bass, sound pretty decent. The acoustic guitar tone needs pretty major help. I suggest getting rid of your Behringer and Boss stuff, and looking into some better A/D conversion. Best of luck! ![]() TK |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 470
|
...
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Banned Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 565
|
Diatonic may be correct regarding 200 as opposed to 100hz.. I am listening on my net computer which is Logitech with a subwoofer. 100hz tends to go missing on this system. Regardless, there's definately things to address in the general low mid area. tk |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2007 Location: Alabama
Posts: 950
Thread Starter | Awesome!!!!
Thanks guys. These are the kinds of comments I was hoping to get. Yes my room is quite small. I know my room is lacking, now I have a better idea where. I will work on getting better bass traps. The Behringer and Boss, stuff were not used on any part of this song as well as the other song, although I have been on a quest to make gear improvements. I shall go back to the drawing board on the mixes.
__________________ -Fishmed |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 470
|
...
|
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2007 Location: Alabama
Posts: 950
Thread Starter | Quote:
Ha, that is my problem, I like Prog-Metal. Seriously, now that I know where to look in my mixes, I think can get some better mixes. At least I was consistant in the flaws. This song is part of an ablum I recorded several years ago, so I am remixing it for more practice and refinement. The full band mixes I did on the Behringer, have bigger frequency issues than this one, mainly because of the pre amps. | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Banned Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 565
| Quote:
Yeah, this a good thing for you. I went through the exact same process. I posted some mixes, and got similar feedback. Then i went back to the drawing board (mixing board build them back up again. Made some gear changes, etc.. And things are looking up, so ![]() Its all good! Again, best of luck! And i'd love to hear more mixes from you in the near future to hear how you're doing.thumbsup TK | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2007 Location: Alabama
Posts: 950
Thread Starter |
(Removed new mix link... SUCK-O-LA!!)
|
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2007 Location: Alabama
Posts: 950
Thread Starter |
Ok, NOW I have a much better mix up for evaluation. I left the original for comparison. Rip Away!!!! .................... |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jul 2006 Location: Oden Forest / Mannheim, Gearmany
Posts: 66
|
Hello Mr. Fisher, Seems you've a monitoring issue indeed. The Hole mentioned above is still there, Hihat and Snare are really mean @ 4k and above, Vox and Guitars have that 1k näg näg, there are tons of harsh highs and so on.. I know you shouln't do this but try a mix just using a sort of analyser comparing between your mix and some commercial Records. Make your mix duller than the others, like a gentle roll off from 4k to 18k, because your recordings cant stand that much treble cause the treble doesn't sound good at them, maybe your gear, mic positions... Make every instrument look really flat on the analyser first, guitars from 100 till 4k k then roll off .till about 8k, Overheads from 200 to 10k, Snare from 200 to maybe 5-6 and so on. Find the offending Frequencies. Boost narrow, sweep (better hear, guess, adjust freq., turn eq on, if its not the one turn off, guess again till you find it and the cut narrow, turn eq on off to learn how the specific Frequ. mask your audio.) Find the plastic Freq. first, often between 800-4k. Its the quak quak (900-1k) or näg näg (about 2k) or (küch küch) 3k, kich kich (4k) then cut, till the signals arent peaky or itchy anymore. Maybe that sounds dull to you first but leave it... Try it, look at the analyser, practice, practice, don't listen at high volumes. Hope this helps. Cheers, Jens |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Jumping up from 6.9 - 7.3 + G5 mac Pro | jumpnyc | Music computers | 0 | 23rd October 2007 01:27 AM |
| The big Question, jumping into Protools, what have i forgotten? | saint | High end | 15 | 28th June 2006 06:46 PM |
| Working on 002 then jumping to HD3 | nethereyes | High end | 5 | 27th March 2006 02:06 PM |
| jumping ships... | BenJah | Music computers | 9 | 2nd February 2006 10:18 PM |
| Jumping into OS X/PT6! | Michael Hammar | Music computers | 1 | 4th April 2003 01:51 PM |
| |