14th September 2012
|
#1 | | Gear Head
Joined: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 53
Thread Starter | CONTROL ROOM v. LIVE ROOM INSULATION?
I'm understanding that building from scratch allows opportunities to insulate control room walls and in effect pre-treat them. Should I be looking into a similar product (as in bass traps) for the interior frames? At least floor-to-ceiling corners?
Right now my plans call for suspended 2x3 framing, RC-2 with a 1" cavity, that's it. My walls are 6" Reward Wall ICF.
|
| |
14th September 2012
|
#2 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Sep 2007 Location: Old Tappan, NJ USA
Posts: 1,332
|
in the ceiling description you provided, their is not much you could do easily to create an "inside-out" assembly (i.e. the insulation facing the room). two factors - fire rating in NYC is typically 2 hour and no exposed joists in your layering. so if you went with the necessary fire rating for the ceiling then used framing below that to hold the insulation and cloth etc then you could probably do it. same issues for the walls. it's doubtful the building department would let you build true inside out walls. probably best to focus on getting the proper isolation and fire ratings etc done then treat.
for treatments, unless you have worked through all the calculations and can design it beforehand - consider building out the rooms, measure the acoustics, then build appropriate treatments.
|
| |
14th September 2012
|
#3 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2004 Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 4,483
| Quote:
Originally Posted by gullfo in the ceiling description you provided, their is not much you could do easily to create an "inside-out" assembly (i.e. the insulation facing the room). two factors - fire rating in NYC is typically 2 hour and no exposed joists in your layering. so if you went with the necessary fire rating for the ceiling then used framing below that to hold the insulation and cloth etc then you could probably do it. same issues for the walls. it's doubtful the building department would let you build true inside out walls. probably best to focus on getting the proper isolation and fire ratings etc done then treat.
for treatments, unless you have worked through all the calculations and can design it beforehand - consider building out the rooms, measure the acoustics, then build appropriate treatments. | +1.
Andre
|
| |
14th September 2012
|
#4 | | Gear Head
Joined: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 53
Thread Starter |
Ok. I'm slightly confused...I'm understanding I need to insulate walls to avoid resonance in the wall spaces.
i.e. ICF + space + framing + insulation + sheetrock = total wall.
|
| |
14th September 2012
|
#5 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2004 Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 4,483
| Quote:
Originally Posted by circa70 Ok. I'm slightly confused...I'm understanding I need to insulate walls to avoid resonance in the wall spaces.
i.e. ICF + space + framing + insulation + sheetrock = total wall. | What are asking about exactly. I was under the impression it was ceiling, as was Glenn.
Andre
__________________ Good studio building is 90% design and 10% construction. |
| |
14th September 2012
|
#6 | | Gear Head
Joined: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 53
Thread Starter |
I'm asking about insulating the walls. Right now my wall plans read: 2x3 framing + 1" airspace + rc-2 + 5/8 sheetrock. No insulation. Has the architect made a mistake leaving out insulation (seems to be yes). What kind should go in the walls? 703/Rockboard 60 or comparable?
|
| |
15th September 2012
|
#7 | | Gear addict
Joined: Sep 2012 Location: Atlanta, GA & Bradford, UK
Posts: 358
| Quote:
Originally Posted by circa70 I'm asking about insulating the walls. Right now my wall plans read: 2x3 framing + 1" airspace + rc-2 + 5/8 sheetrock. No insulation. Has the architect made a mistake leaving out insulation (seems to be yes). What kind should go in the walls? 703/Rockboard 60 or comparable? | Hello!
The architect hasn't made a mistake per se, a lot of walls are built without insulation. Typically, only the outer shell walls are insulated. However, walls can and do resonate without insulation, so you should insulate them. It won't necessarily act like a bass trap, but it will prevent the walls from resonating, and will help with sound transmission as well. For filling the cavity, use whatever is cheapest. You do not need 703 or any rigid boards. Pink fluff insulation will work great.
|
| |
15th September 2012
|
#8 | | Gear Head
Joined: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 53
Thread Starter |
Thank you Alex. And the Reward Wall? Does the concrete/styrofoam factor into needed treatments? Probably just have to test regardless.
|
| |
15th September 2012
|
#9 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Sep 2007 Location: Old Tappan, NJ USA
Posts: 1,332
|
you should have insulation and vapor barrier to ensure that moisture is contained. use light insulation something like the R11 pink insulation will suffice for the space between drywall and concrete walls. depending on the room and mass, the 2x3 may be too small for purpose, and if you're separating the frame from the concrete, why the RC? the RC will potentially reduce your LF isolation.
|
| |
15th September 2012
|
#10 | | Gear Head
Joined: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 53
Thread Starter |
Thanks for all this, this is helpful. The architect I'm working with has not designed a studio before so it's possible she added some redundant features like decoupling framing AND rc. I'm trying to interpret her plans/learn her language and fill in her blanks. Re: decoupling frame v. rc, just do one or the other?
|
| |
15th September 2012
|
#11 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2003 Location: Central Village CT
Posts: 3,342
| Quote:
Originally Posted by GIK Acoustics Hello!
The architect hasn't made a mistake per se, a lot of walls are built without insulation. Typically, only the outer shell walls are insulated. However, walls can and do resonate without insulation, so you should insulate them. It won't necessarily act like a bass trap, but it will prevent the walls from resonating, and will help with sound transmission as well. For filling the cavity, use whatever is cheapest. You do not need 703 or any rigid boards. Pink fluff insulation will work great. | Glenn,
When it comes to standard construction you are absolutely correct - but when it comes to constructing walls specifically to create isolation between spaces - insulation in the cavity adds a lot of cheap additional isolation, I have never designed a wall for the purpose of isolation that did not have insulation in the cavity.........
Rod
|
| |
15th September 2012
|
#12 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2003 Location: Central Village CT
Posts: 3,342
| Quote:
Originally Posted by circa70 Thanks for all this, this is helpful. The architect I'm working with has not designed a studio before so it's possible she added some redundant features like decoupling framing AND rc. I'm trying to interpret her plans/learn her language and fill in her blanks. Re: decoupling frame v. rc, just do one or the other? | You get small benefits with resilient channel - larger benefits with RISC clips systems - and even larger benefits with isolated framing......
Once you have isolated framing - you begin penalizing yourself by adding things like resilient channels.
It's my experience that most architects don't have much of a clue when it comes to sound isolation systems.
Rod
|
| |
15th September 2012
|
#13 | | Gear Head
Joined: Nov 2005 Location: New York City
Posts: 53
Thread Starter |
Thank you for adding that. Right now I have an empty concrete space measuring 14'3" x 22'3". There's expansion/neoprene down the center effectively making two slabs.
My architect specs 2x3 framing, I'm thinking 2x4.
She specs no insulation. I'm thinking regular r19 with rockwool up the corners.
She specs a 2" gap in the double-walled partition. I'm thinking 4" at least.
I guess I should plan for isolating framing and skip rc or clips?
|
| | | |