Single Leaf Study? Paper? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics

Single Leaf Study? Paper?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 24th July 2012   #1
Gear addict
 
John White's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 377

Thread Starter
Single Leaf Study? Paper?

Does anyone know a paper with reports concerning transmission loss of single leaf partitions? I am very interested to know how a single leaf compares to wall assemblies such as the different configurations in IRC-761.

I know there is the Mass Law equation [ R= 20 log (fm) - 47 dB], but evidently that applies to limp mass partitions. Then one must include the elasticity (Young's Modulus?), but quite frankly it's over my head.

In particular, I'd like to know how favorably a single leaf partition compares to a standard two leaf assembly with respect to how a dual leaf wall typically has a coincidence (edit- no, a resonance) in the low frequencies.
__________________
-john
John White is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
avare's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 4,445

Quote:
Originally Posted by John White View Post
Does anyone know a paper with reports concerning transmission loss of single leaf partitions? I am very interested to know how a single leaf compares to wall assemblies such as the different configurations in IRC-761.

I know there is the Mass Law equation [ R= 20 log (fm) - 47 dB], but evidently that applies to limp mass partitions. Then one must include the elasticity (Young's Modulus?), but quite frankly it's over my head.

In particular, I'd like to know how favorably a single leaf partition compares to a standard two leaf assembly with respect to how a dual leaf wall typically has a coincidence (edit- no, a resonance) in the low frequencies.
NRC is your friend. Look at IR 818 text page 73 for starters.

Andre
__________________
Good studio building is 90% design and 10% construction.
avare is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #3
Gear addict
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 461

JW, how many examples do you want? IR-586 has single leaf masonry walls, with and without added plasterboard over a cavity, attached via various means and with/without infill. IR-811 also has some test data for floor layers only, ceiling layers only.
Sebg is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #4
Gear addict
 
John White's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 377

Thread Starter
Thanks Andre,

Unfortunately I was hoping for more examples like the one on page 73. Specifically, tests with one layer of gypsum, two layers, mdf, etc. The remaining tests were of more typical mass-stud-mass assemblies.

PS Great tests BTW. Some very high losses on some of the walls. Must be from the vinyl siding.
John White is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #5
Gear addict
 
John White's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 377

Thread Starter
Sebg,

Yes, I should have been more specific originally. As I've written subsequently, I am currently more interested in single partitions of DW for starters.

It may not sound realistic in a build, yet if the data presents itself favorably, I can see a use.

The only study I ran across in this regard was single wall partitions in order to show the effects of various amounts of insulation on TL.
John White is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #6
Lives for gear
 
jhbrandt's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 2,947

Send a message via Yahoo to jhbrandt Send a message via Skype™ to jhbrandt
Quote:
Originally Posted by John White View Post
.....Some very high losses on some of the walls. Must be from the vinyl siding.


Good one John!
Cheers
jhbrandt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #7
Lives for gear
 
avare's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 4,445

Quote:
Originally Posted by John White View Post
Sebg,

Yes, I should have been more specific originally. As I've written subsequently, I am currently more interested in single partitions of DW for starters.
The test I refered to uses MDF. Mass is mass.

Andre
avare is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #8
Gear addict
 
John White's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 377

Thread Starter
Disregard the following. Question in next post.

That example was OSB, but thanks, I think I understand:

So if I have a 50Lb sheet of OSB that obtains 25dB TL at 1000k-
Then I should have 50dB TL with a 100Lb sheet of MDF?
And 37.5dB with a 75Lb sheet of DW?

Is this linear with respect to frequency among different materials?

How does doubling or tripling the mass equate with doubling and tripling the number of sheets? I would imagine there is at least some greater loss due to friction or something similar.

Last edited by John White; 25th July 2012 at 10:54 PM.. Reason: Math
John White is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #9
Gear addict
 
John White's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 377

Thread Starter
That example was OSB, but thanks, I think I understand:

So if I have a 50Lb sheet of OSB that obtains 25dB TL at 1000k-
Then I should have 31dB TL with a 100Lb sheet of MDF?
And 28dB with a 75Lb sheet of DW?

Is this linear with respect to frequency among different materials?

How does doubling or tripling the mass equate with doubling and tripling the number of sheets? I would imagine there is at least some greater loss due to friction or something similar.
John White is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2012   #10
Lives for gear
 
avare's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 4,445

Quote:
Originally Posted by John White View Post
That example was OSB, but thanks, I think I understand:

So if I have a 50Lb sheet of OSB that obtains 25dB TL at 1000k-
Then I should have 31dB TL with a 100Lb sheet of MDF?
And 28dB with a 75Lb sheet of DW?

Is this linear with respect to frequency among different materials?

How does doubling or tripling the mass equate with doubling and tripling the number of sheets? I would imagine there is at least some greater loss due to friction or something similar.
It is fairly linesr in the TL increases by 6 dB per doubling of mass. There is minimal losss due to frcition between the layers. This type of loss is what Green Glue does.

Andre
avare is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2012   #11
Lives for gear
 
jhbrandt's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 2,947

Send a message via Yahoo to jhbrandt Send a message via Skype™ to jhbrandt
Agreed, but anymore I only count on getting about 5db per doubling of mass. It's all about the mass, John, when considering single partitions. I subtract the 1db accounting for real world issues.

I have a 'quickie' calculator for Mass Law in my Reflections Boundaries Mass excel calulator on my publications page.... line 80 on the second tab.

Cheers,
John
__________________
John H. Brandt
Recording Studio Design/Consulting, Acoustics, & Electronics
Jakarta, Indonesia
See our new PRODUCTS page.

"Twenty thousand dollars worth of Snap-On tools does not make you a Professional Diesel Mechanic"
jhbrandt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2012   #12
Lives for gear
 
avare's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 4,445

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhbrandt View Post
Agreed, but anymore I only count on getting about 5db per doubling of mass. It's all about the mass, John, when considering single partitions. I subtract the 1db accounting for real world issues.
+1.

Massively,
Andre
avare is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2012   #13
Gear addict
 
John White's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 377

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by avare View Post
It is fairly linesr in the TL increases by 6 dB per doubling of mass. There is minimal losss due to frcition between the layers...
Andre
Great. Thank you.

I have found the "Modulus of Elasticity" for a few materials. I'll try to post a few examples using this and just mass for mass in the next week or so. Just as an exercise for me and interest to any one. I'll use 6dB for doubling of mass as this is theoretical anyway, but noted.
John White is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Triple leaf - at what leaf spacings is it acceptable? 666666 Studio building / acoustics 33 7th March 2013 05:10 PM
Stucco wall as 1 leaf in 2 leaf MSM system? RicRox Studio building / acoustics 2 4th February 2012 10:31 AM
A glimpse inside the audiophile mind. Interesting paper/study Teddy Ray Mastering forum 145 4th July 2011 05:44 PM
Is there a dreaded 4th leaf like the dreaded 3rd leaf? 95svtcobta Studio building / acoustics 4 13th February 2011 04:00 PM
Single pane glass with a double pane. Tripple leaf? Rossome Studio building / acoustics 1 7th January 2009 11:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:54 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.