Roxul Safe n' Sound: bad for health? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics

Roxul Safe n' Sound: bad for health?
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd July 2012   #1
Gear nut
 
Golitan11's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 117

Thread Starter
Roxul Safe n' Sound: bad for health?

I have three main questions:

1. Do you recommend another product for absorbsion acoustic panel (keep in mind that I have a very small budget and I live in Canada (Montreal))?
2. My studio is also my bedroom, so if I have, for example, 12 panels, is it health dangerous?
3. Do I absolutely need panels in the corners (bass traps) or panels on walls and ceiling do the job for bass absorbsion?

P.S. My room is 15'x15' and I am planning to make 12 panels of 2'x4' (6 per speaker, none for the subwoofer).
Golitan11 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2012   #2
Gear maniac
 
Arqen's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 217

Based on my research, Roxul is very good for insulation, and it will technically work as absorption, but that's not what it's designed for. Roxul is designed for use as insulation between your wall studs. It's a good choice if you're simply looking for insulation. An alternative, which excels as both an insulation treatment OR broadband absorption treatment is Bounded Logic Ultratouch (made from recycled denim).

If you're simply looking for an absorption treatment for your wall surfaces (not insulation), I recommend getting a product designed specifically for broadband absorption, such as Bounded Logic Acoustical Panels.

Here's some safety data on Roxul Safe'n'Sound.

I give more information on Roxul, Bonded Logic and other products in part 2 of my report on recording studio design: green soundproofing and acoustic materials. Visit that link to download it free.

I cover a range of absorption and insulation products that are designed to be safe to use, while having low environmental impact.

Cheers,

Tim

Last edited by Arqen; 24th July 2012 at 01:17 AM.. Reason: Added content
Arqen is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2012   #3
Gear nut
 
Golitan11's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 117

Thread Starter
Ok thanks, I am now planning to buy UltraTouch Denim Insulation.

1. Are 10 2'x4' framed acoustic panels ok (one each wall/ceiling per speaker)?
2. Are bass traps mandatory (if yes, how do you place them (height))?
3. Except acoustic panels and bass traps, is there anything else missing (like foam under monitors)?
Golitan11 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2012   #4
jwl
Lives for gear
 
jwl's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: southern Maine
Posts: 1,591

Send a message via AIM to jwl Send a message via Yahoo to jwl
I used to like Ultratouch for absorbers and bass traps (assuming you can get it to look good since it is so floppy) but more recent testing shows its gas flow properties aren't as good as other, proven materials such as rigid fiberglass. Because of that I don't really recommend it anymore.
jwl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2012   #5
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 14,244

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwl View Post
I used to like Ultratouch for absorbers and bass traps (assuming you can get it to look good since it is so floppy) but more recent testing shows its gas flow properties aren't as good as other, proven materials such as rigid fiberglass. Because of that I don't really recommend it anymore.
Interesting. Do you have any links on the testing?
Glenn Kuras is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2012   #6
Lives for gear
 
avare's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 4,444

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golitan11 View Post
I have three main questions:

1. Do you recommend another product for absorbsion acoustic panel (keep in mind that I have a very small budget and I live in Canada (Montreal))?
2. My studio is also my bedroom, so if I have, for example, 12 panels, is it health dangerous?
It is fine for both.

Quote:
3. Do I absolutely need panels in the corners (bass traps) or panels on walls and ceiling do the job for bass absorbsion?
Only you can answer that question. You have big problem with the room being square to begin with.

Andre
__________________
Good studio building is 90% design and 10% construction.
avare is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th July 2012   #7
Gear nut
 
Golitan11's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 117

Thread Starter
What does "gas flow" means and change in absorption?
Golitan11 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #8
Gear nut
 
Golitan11's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 117

Thread Starter
Here are my questions:

1. Which one would be the best: Roxul Safe n' Sound or Bonded Logic UltraTouch?
2. I'm still not sure about making acoustic panels because of the health factor (some people, for example, say that Safe n' Sound smell really bad). So are you all sure that there are no risk at all (it is my #1 priority)?
3. Like I said before, what is "gas flow" and what does it change in absorption?

Thanks!
Golitan11 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #9
Lives for gear
 
jhbrandt's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 2,945

Send a message via Yahoo to jhbrandt Send a message via Skype™ to jhbrandt


I think you guys are splitting hairs.

There are zero rock wool or rigid fiberglass products that were designed or manufactured for use in recording studios. We use products in our little-tiny niche studio market that were designed for architectural use and/or building/construction use.

My question for you is: Which one is cheaper? Which one is easier to work with? and.. Which one is more readily available? Look at the specs and get the product that will perform as desired.

There are minor differences in the performance of different products, compare the differences and look at the efficiency of the complete project both acoustically and economically.

As far as smell and health... LET IT AIR OUT! we've been putting this stuff in homes and studios for a VERY long time with no health issues. It is the binder system that is stinky.. let it off-gas before installing.

Cheers,
John
__________________
John H. Brandt
Recording Studio Design/Consulting, Acoustics, & Electronics
Jakarta, Indonesia
See our new PRODUCTS page.

"Twenty thousand dollars worth of Snap-On tools does not make you a Professional Diesel Mechanic"
jhbrandt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #10
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 14,244

Quote:
2. I'm still not sure about making acoustic panels because of the health factor (some people, for example, say that Safe n' Sound smell really bad). So are you all sure that there are no risk at all (it is my #1 priority)?
As John said you really should not worry about health factor but there is a air quality that some are better then others. I would stick with Knauf. Here is our take on it.

Quote:
GIK Acoustics uses sound absorption insulation with ECOSE technology. Unlike most competing products, it is manufactured from naturally occurring and/or recycled raw materials and bonded using a bio-based technology free from formaldehyde, phenols, acrylics and with no artificial colors, bleaches or dyes. ECOSE reduces energy consumption and pollutants stemming from the production process and is therefore more fully recyclable than standard mineral wool or fiberglass. The absorptive core has earned the toughest indoor air quality certification in the industry, GREENGUARDâ„¢, which is certified to meet CHPS Low-Emitting Materials criteria section 01350. GIK Acoustics treatments with ECOSE technology are easy on air quality for your room, the environment, and your budget.
__________________
Glenn Kuras
GIK Acoustics USA
GIK Acoustics Europe
http://www.gikacoustics.de (German Translation)
770 986 2789 (USA)
+44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (Europe)

Built in Slat design (Scattering/Diffusion) on all Bass Traps click here
Glenn Kuras is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #11
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,498

The most common health risk would be skin and eye irritation from loose fibers during handling it unless you have a particular sensitivity to it. Loose fibers can also be a lung irritant.

Here is a link to a pretty detailed review of several studies:

http://www.nmcphc.med.navy.mil/downloads/ih/mmvf.pdf
2manyrocks is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #12
Rocket Scientist
 
foldback's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,348

Roxul

It just does not get better or more clear than this great post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhbrandt View Post


I think you guys are splitting hairs.

There are zero rock wool or rigid fiberglass products that were designed or manufactured for use in recording studios. We use products in our little-tiny niche studio market that were designed for architectural use and/or building/construction use.

My question for you is: Which one is cheaper? Which one is easier to work with? and.. Which one is more readily available? Look at the specs and get the product that will perform as desired.

There are minor differences in the performance of different products, compare the differences and look at the efficiency of the complete project both acoustically and economically.

As far as smell and health... LET IT AIR OUT! we've been putting this stuff in homes and studios for a VERY long time with no health issues. It is the binder system that is stinky.. let it off-gas before installing.

Cheers,
John
Last time I looked Roxul had a lot of compelling information on their web site. I love their product, sounds very good to my ears :-)

Good music to all!
foldback is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 25th July 2012   #13
Lives for gear
 
avare's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 4,444

Ultratouch starts to reflsct internally at thicknesses greater than 4". IF you are 4" or thinner, use either. If thicker than 4" SnS is the way to go of your posted options.

Andre
avare is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2012   #14
Gear nut
 
Golitan11's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 117

Thread Starter
So if I buy Roxul Safe n' Sound, how long should I let it "breathe" (ventilate)?
Golitan11 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2012   #15
Lives for gear
 
jhbrandt's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 2,945

Send a message via Yahoo to jhbrandt Send a message via Skype™ to jhbrandt
Give it a week open & separated in the garage & if you can smell anything after a week, give it another week. It depends on how much air is passing through it, etc. Just prop it up so that it can off-gas.

Cheers,
John
jhbrandt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 26th July 2012   #16
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,498

http://www.roxul.com/files/RX-NA-EN/...ta%20Sheet.pdf

It appears to use a type of cured formadehyde binder.

There's another recent thread here where the OP reported that rockwool made his eyes itch and that the itch spread to his arms after about an hour. He did not identify which product he used, and it was not clear whether he had any unusually high sensitivity to it or not. He also used some kind of glue on the rockwool. Effects of rockwool

Since the OP here is putting Roxul in a bedroom, it really should be aired out and some caution used.
2manyrocks is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2012   #17
Lives for gear
 
jhbrandt's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Posts: 2,945

Send a message via Yahoo to jhbrandt Send a message via Skype™ to jhbrandt
Rocks,

That is a typical example of someone who has allergies. IF you are allergic or have asthma, be certain to let it off-gas completely.

Otherwise, if you are like most people, it's not going to bother you. Personally, I hate to get itchy working with it, but other than that, it doesn't bother me in the least. - Even in a freshly built room with no air-out period. I get more 'eye-watering' annoyance from fresh plywood.
-- Yeah, at my age, I still go to the shop and feel like I have to 'show' the guys how to do things.

Always use a dust mask when working with it and rubber gloves - cover your arms and body as best you can, if you don't like getting itchy.

If you do this, it will NOT hurt you. It's just a pain.... like reaching into a poopie toilet to retrieve a child's toy. It washes off.

Cheers,
John
jhbrandt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th July 2012   #18
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Location: Graham, NC

Quote:
Originally Posted by jhbrandt View Post
Rocks,

That is a typical example of someone who has allergies. IF you are allergic or have asthma, be certain to let it off-gas completely.

Otherwise, if you are like most people, it's not going to bother you. Personally, I hate to get itchy working with it, but other than that, it doesn't bother me in the least. - Even in a freshly built room with no air-out period. I get more 'eye-watering' annoyance from fresh plywood.
-- Yeah, at my age, I still go to the shop and feel like I have to 'show' the guys how to do things.

Always use a dust mask when working with it and rubber gloves - cover your arms and body as best you can, if you don't like getting itchy.

If you do this, it will NOT hurt you. It's just a pain.... like reaching into a poopie toilet to retrieve a child's toy. It washes off.

Cheers,
John
+1

For me, regular "pink fluffy" insulation can be handled with minimal skin protection, as it only RARELY causes any irritation.

OC703 causes quite a bit more irritation, so I generally avoid skin contact whenever possible and I do use gloves at all times.

Mineral wool is the mother of all skin irritants, and I cover everything I possibly can, including taping the gap between sleeves and gloves, safety goggles and if I'm going to be working extensively with it, I'll grab a pair of the wife's old panty hose and cut a leg off to cover my head.

Most of the time I was building my studio, I did use a dust mask or respirator mask, if I was working overhead or having to cut a lot of material.

I did have a friend help me for about 2 hours one day, and he couldn't help me with ANY insulation after that. No matter how much he was covered, even working with the pink fluffy, he was covered in a rash in a very short period of time.

So, the word to the wise is... be careful and cover yourself as best you can... it may help, it may not.

As an epilogue, the friend who helped me... has been in the studio several times, and has had no issues with any kind of rash. So, it appears that his was a reaction to physical contact with insulation.
__________________
Good shit ain't cheap, and cheap shit ain't always good.

The finished studio: www.darkpinestudios.com

Studio build blog; dm mobile.com

A Rod Gervais designed studio
xaMdaM is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2012   #19
Gear interested
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 3

Quote:
So, the word to the wise is... be careful and cover yourself as best you can... it may help, it may not.
Hi. I was wondering what you meant by this. I understand that it isn't healthy but what do we need to cover ourselves with?
Retin-a
edward45 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2012   #20
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,498

Dust mask, gloves, long sleeves and pants are typically recommended over shorts and a a T shirt. Or you can buy disposable coveralls like painters use for probably under $10.
2manyrocks is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2012   #21
Gear nut
 
Golitan11's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 117

Thread Starter
I did not use any dust mask and I did not covered myself except for gloves (t-shirt and shorts) and I am still alive! So I think it is really personal (it did not itch or irritate).
Golitan11 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2012   #22
Lives for gear
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,211

The real question is, 'how bad is it'. The dust created by insulation products is in all cases a lung irritant. Asbestos was proven to become carcinogenic via the inhalation of it's particulate. These days, things have become 'cleaner', but also the people who work with the materials more informed. You must always use a mask/respirator when handling quantities of dust producing materials. I do not always trust science, because even the Electron Microscope cannot find a Higgs Boson.

Sometimes I will handle mineral wool without a mask. I always use gloves because of the irritation to the skin, but it's not always that a PLUUUUME of the stuff is created. When handling these materials, try not to force them. It is in their motion that the dust particulates seperate, and by being steady the amount of dust released is largely reduced.

To put things in perspective, even common household dust is a lung irritant. But I still don't want to breathe it.

To Golitan, follow jhbrandt's advice and let the insulation aerate/offgas.
OpusOfTrolls is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10th September 2012   #23
Lives for gear
 
TornadoTed's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Wales
Posts: 1,518

I use these disposable suits whenever I am handling insulation a lot, they are brilliant and cut out so much irritation.

Amazon.co.uk: disposable boiler suits

Also great when strimming to avoid getting covered in pureed slug
__________________
Ed Lewis
Giant Wafer Studios, UK

www.giantwafer.com
TornadoTed is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2012   #24
Lives for gear
 
kasmira's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2011
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,257

Send a message via AIM to kasmira
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpusOfTrolls View Post
I do not always trust science, because even the Electron Microscope cannot find a Higgs Boson.
Woah buddy. Apples to oranges. The Higgs Boson is particle that is theorized to exist. The actual (not theorized) effects of thermal insulation has been scientifically tested many times.
kasmira is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2012   #25
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,498

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golitan11 View Post
I did not use any dust mask and I did not covered myself except for gloves (t-shirt and shorts) and I am still alive! So I think it is really personal (it did not itch or irritate).
Some are more bothered by it than others. The less handling of it--the better, too, as was just mentioned.
2manyrocks is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Case for Mackie HR824s Nathanael Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 14 1st September 2007 11:22 PM
Pro Tools III NuBus system for location recording Sonicmook56 Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 8 10th August 2006 03:56 AM
DAW for location surround work? hollywood_steve Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 8 1st November 2003 09:23 PM
Laptop for live recording--Mac or PC (Sorry!) Telepc Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 8 19th October 2003 08:46 PM
DP 3 for mobile editing...can't afford another Mix or HD cajonezzz Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 5 11th August 2002 02:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:12 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.