Your preference for voice booths? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics

Your preference for voice booths?
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 18th July 2012   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 666

Thread Starter
Your preference for voice booths?

Simple question (I hope)!

Imagine a small voiceover or vocal booth. Assuming everything else is in good order and your bass is well tamed with traps etc, what would be your preference for the "top dressing" or "final coat"?

Most pro studios I visit will use Rockwool slab covered with Hessian. I've always done that too. But what about pyramid foam like Auralex supply?

Any advantage over Rockwool slab?

Anyone have a strong preference?

Slab or foam for that final 2 inches?
Dayo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2012   #2
jwl
Lives for gear
 
jwl's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Location: southern Maine
Posts: 1,598

Send a message via AIM to jwl Send a message via Yahoo to jwl
I have enough of an opinion about this topic that I wrote an article about it: http://realtraps.com/art_booth.htm

In general, tiny booths don't sound good, but can be made workable with as much bass trapping as possible, and making the booths dead at higher frequencies.
jwl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2012   #3
Lives for gear
 
Tom Higgins's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: London
Posts: 764

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwl View Post
In general, tiny booths don't sound good, but can be made workable with as much bass trapping as possible, and making the booths dead at higher frequencies.
+1
Tom Higgins is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2012   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 666

Thread Starter
Well, I did say assuming everything was was in good order.

The room is small but it sounds pretty good. I'm just wondering if anyone has trialed Rockwool vs Pyramid foam for the wall?

And as an aside - is there any consensus on the smallest acoustically workable size for a professional booth?
Dayo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2012   #5
Lives for gear
 
Tom Higgins's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: London
Posts: 764

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayo View Post
The room is small but it sounds pretty good. I'm just wondering if anyone has trialed Rockwool vs Pyramid foam for the wall?
Rockwool would be better. Foam is thin so will only affect higher frequencies leaving the room with bass problems - i.e. boomy/muddy tracks
Try to use as thick bass traps as possible.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayo View Post
And as an aside - is there any consensus on the smallest acoustically workable size for a professional booth?
Not really - as big as possible really, I guess, without compromising CR and the LR sizes.
__________________
'... what you heard .. It wasn't music ..' Ray Subsonic

'This is the kind of pedantic nonsense up with which I will not put!' Winston Churchill
Tom Higgins is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2012   #6
Gear Guru
 
Glenn Kuras's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 14,263

Quote:
The room is small but it sounds pretty good. I'm just wondering if anyone has trialed Rockwool vs Pyramid foam for the wall?
I would go with the Rockwool.



Quote:
And as an aside - is there any consensus on the smallest acoustically workable size for a professional booth?
No there is no standard, but things like closets in a room are really way to small.
__________________
Glenn Kuras
GIK Acoustics USA
GIK Acoustics Europe
http://www.gikacoustics.de (German Translation)
770 986 2789 (USA)
+44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (Europe)

Built in Slat design (Scattering/Diffusion) on all Bass Traps click here
Glenn Kuras is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2012   #7
Lives for gear
 
Rod Gervais's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Central Village CT
Posts: 3,185

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dayo View Post
Well, I did say assuming everything was was in good order.

The room is small but it sounds pretty good. I'm just wondering if anyone has trialed Rockwool vs Pyramid foam for the wall?

And as an aside - is there any consensus on the smallest acoustically workable size for a professional booth?
If we assume "everything is in good order" - why would we be adding anything that was absorbent to the room?

Questions/statements like this always seem to confuse me.........

Rod
Rod Gervais is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2012   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 666

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod Gervais View Post
If we assume "everything is in good order" - why would we be adding anything that was absorbent to the room?

Questions/statements like this always seem to confuse me.........

Rod
I guess that could be confusing.

Imagine that the bass is well tamed with large rockwool filled bass traps. So, sculpted foam or Auralex for the 2 inch wall treatment on the remaining walls?
Dayo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2012   #9
Lives for gear
 
Melgueil's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Montpellier, France
Posts: 1,066

FWIW, my 3mx3m control room (which I record vocals in) is a mixed bad of heavy Rockwool trapping in the corners, cloud, and faux paintings backed by 4cm Rockwool. I added foam to taste in the other bear areas after I had covered the low end. The ceiling has a good amount of foam as well.

I ended up with a pretty dead (but not too dead) room suitable for vocals and acoustic instruments.

If you cover the low end you can always add/subtract foam panels as needed.
In general if the room has too dead a sound it is hard to work with and think you can add the "room" back in with verb.

Cdlt
__________________
Enfin... tout le monde a une Rolex. Si à cinquante ans, on n'a pas une Rolex, on a quand même raté sa vie !"
- Jacques Séguéla -
Melgueil is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2012   #10
Lives for gear
 
DanDan's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: Cork Ireland
Posts: 8,664

Advantage

If the thickness is equal, then the angled surface of sculpted foam may be a slight advantage in these close quarters.
In particular I am thinking about mouth height and overhead.
DD
DanDan is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2012   #11
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 666

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanDan View Post
If the thickness is equal, then the angled surface of sculpted foam may be a slight advantage in these close quarters.
In particular I am thinking about mouth height and overhead.
DD
Why couldn't I have phrased the question as elegantly as your reply - thanks DD
Dayo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2012   #12
Gear addict
 
myles's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Location: SW France/East Devon UK
Posts: 334

Quote:
Originally Posted by Melgueil View Post
I added foam to taste in the other bear areas after I had covered the low end.
I think the first thing I'd do is get rid of those bears, especially if you have snacks in the studio.



But, seriously... yes, dead is better. Nothing spells "bad studio" like the sound of a small room on vocals or voice-overs. And, to take it a step further, noisy (rumbly) HVAC. The "talent" does need to breathe.
myles is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
mobile ProTools rig... advice needed/ post your pics!!! tsd Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 16 5th March 2013 10:45 PM
For studio construction slutz only - Sunshine Mastering, Vienna mischa janisch Photo diaries of recording studio construction projects 167 6th December 2012 11:08 PM
Building your own transformer balanced microphone splitters? moonpi Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 6 14th March 2007 10:11 PM
What altiverb voice preset do you use ? Lefrançais So much gear, so little time! 2 31st December 2006 09:17 AM
DP 3 for mobile editing...can't afford another Mix or HD cajonezzz Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 5 11th August 2002 02:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:20 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.