![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
Closed | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #61 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 902
| Quote:
if you're referring to light (electromagnetic radiation within the visible spectrum), then yes - seeing the tweeter in the mirror is an ACTUAL path ![]() do you understand the difference between POSSIBLE and ACTUAL in the context of this thread? POSSIBLE = a geometric reflection path from source to listening position (X-order reflection) ACTUAL = measured, high-gain reflection via the geometric reflection path --- based on speaker's dispersion/radiation pattern, acoustical impedance of boundary, total flight path, etc - of which determine whether such a reflection path is a source of high-gain indirect energy impeding the listening position (thus, requiring treatment). is this confusion the reason why this thread is in such disarray?? | |
| |
| | #62 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2009 Location: Stockholm
Posts: 3,005
| Only the geometrical path. Not possible ones caused by diffraction (not saying that it necessarily always exist but why gamble and use an ineffective method that might not give you the complete picture?).
|
| |
| | #63 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2011 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 222
| Quote:
Jens, Out of curiosity, how often would yousay this occurs? Also, what would you say is the primary source, if any, common to diffraction? Speakers themselves?
__________________ -john | |
| |
| | #64 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2009 Location: Stockholm
Posts: 3,005
| Speaker edges/stands (or the desk itself if placed on it), monitors (screens), mixing desk (naturally), gear racks and other obstacles.
|
| |
| | #65 |
| GS Community Manager |
I am going to close this thread because the bickering just won't cease. The problem is: everyone is complaining about everyone else and I don't know who is right. This is an esoteric argument to a layperson... only people with some pretty good grounding in physics are going to "get it." Until we can find a moderator who has a better understanding of the minutiae of this stuff then posts are going to be deleted and these threads are going to be locked when they fall into disarray like this. I suggest that all of you put each other on your ignore lists: then maybe this stuff won't happen.
__________________ Scott J. - Gearslutz.com Community Manager my other job: http://www.whitecat.tv - film/web/tv/video/audio post & music Gear for sale! @WhitecatTV |
| |
Closed
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which mixing board for church - Mackie TT24, Peavey Sanctuary or Allen & Heath? | jvt | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 36 | 20th February 2012 10:32 PM |
| mic placement and production techniques - Photek and Cinematic Orchestra | hazza | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 4 | 26th February 2008 09:18 AM |
| Mics 101 - placement for beginners | boojum | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 18 | 8th November 2007 03:34 PM |
| CBS - Summer in the City 2007 | Remoteness | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 92 | 11th October 2007 09:19 PM |
| Do bands still expect mixing desks? | warmer | So much gear, so little time! | 42 | 29th November 2006 03:04 PM |
| |