![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| The Official | Pensados Place #21 - Bob Hodas A little bit of what I will say is going to be paraphrased - I'm watching and asking questions as they come. 18:15 "For 20 cycles to develop you need 30 feet." "100Hz takes eleven feet to develop." Does this include reflecting off a wall? For example 5 feet this way 6 feet that way = 11 feet? 21 Minutes He talks about moving the foam/absorption off the wall so it can do more damage (my words not his). Is there any kind of rule of thumb for this? or just the farther off it can be the better? 25 Minutes Q "Where do you like the speakers to sit (height wise)?" A "Depends on the phase measurement of the speaker" Do I have to call Yamaha to get the answer on my HS80's phase measurement? or does anyone know where I find those online? 34 Minutes Under 200 Hz is Omni directional - I knew this prior - but what makes it Omni at that point - better yet what makes it go from just plain directional to Omni at all? Thanks in advance!
__________________ JoRillo JoRillo: Space Ship Status - from the album No Sleep http://soundcloud.com/jorillo-1/no-sleep-space-ship-status Wake Up - Start the Coffee - Make - Mix - Master - Sleep - Start Over |
| | |
| | #2 |
| The Official |
Were they such bad questions? |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 12,007
| Quote:
__________________ Glenn Kuras GIK Acoustics USA GIK Acoustics Europe 770 986 2789 (USA) +44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK) See the NEW Scopus Tuned Trap | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2011 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 222
| This has been posted multiple times on this forum. It seems to get longer and more boring each time.
__________________ -john |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 242
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| The Official | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| The Official |
Only 1/4 answers in two days? Come on guys... the video was just so you had a reference - and for those of us who have never seen it. No one else wants to help out with an answer or two? |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2008 Location: bk
Posts: 669
| Quote:
rule of thumb on pourus absorption is 1/4 wavelengh away from wall is best (depending on your target absorption freq) - they work elsewhere less efficiently and as always cost and efficiency are a factor (if they were free who would care about efficiency) height wise - im not looking at vid right now but is he talking about orientation? if so, vertical insures least phasing issues. if you never move an in and out of your mix position (mix with mouse, plugins - dont move around a desk or use outboard) it matters less. when you move horizontally the distance between tweeter, woofer, and ear change and create phase problems. i am an extreme sceptic to using speakers horizontally. if he is not referring to this, my apologies. bass below 200hz doesnt automatically "become" omni. basically, starting there it becomes more directional (for example, at 300hz its still pretty omni) and of course increasing in directionality all the way up to your hearing limit, where it us highly directional. so it is a gradual increase. | |
| | |
| | #9 | ||
| The Official |
Thanks man. ![]() Quote:
![]() Quote:
Like why is it that a high frequency wave isn't going to disperse in every direction but a low frequency wave will.
| ||
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Oct 2011 Location: Winterthur Switzerland
Posts: 188
|
I don't know if one can explain it without getting to mathematical. Simple experimentation shows that you can much more readily pinpoint the source of a higher pitched tone than a low pitched one (this is the reason the positioning of a sub is not so critical generally). Don't know if this really helps but if you take a long flexible rod and shake it vigorously at one end, the travel at the far end is the same or even less than the travel your hand movement makes. If you now shake it much slower, the travel at the end is quite a bit more than the travel of your hand. It's the nature of frequency that the higher becomes more directional. Light under normal circumstances doesn't "bend" around corners, LW communications are very omni as opposed to SW and esp. MW.
__________________ No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| The Official | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2008 Location: bk
Posts: 669
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| The Official | Quote:
![]() I will definitely be measuring the stands before building them, but in the video he said you should find out the phase measurement of the speaker. This will vary speaker to speaker, so I was wondering if anyone knew what/where the measurement on my Yamaha HS80s would be/would be found. I always was told to have the tweeters pointing about an inch over my ears at listening position, but when I heard him say that I questioned my previous statement. | |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,334
| Quote:
--Ethan The Acoustic Treatment Experts
__________________ Ethan's audio book is now available! | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| The Official | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2008 Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,585
|
It's referring to modal reinforcement. Of course you can hear 20hz in a confined space, it's just that a smaller space doesn't boost frequencies below it's dimensions. And no, reflections do not count in the travel.
__________________ phantom power doesn't make your voice sound spooky |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2011 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 222
| |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,334
| Quote:
--Ethan | |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2003 Location: Central Village CT
Posts: 1,686
| Quote:
Picture it like this - let's suppose we were to suspend you 100' in the air (we'll use Sky Hooks just so nothing can interfere with the sound) and we set you 3' from a speaker. What frequencies would you imagine you could not hear coming from the speaker? There are no reflections - and not enough room (between you and the speaker) for anything below (roughly) 369 Hz to fully develop before reaching you............ yet you would hear every frequency below 369 Hz that the speaker was capable of transmitting. this is because you will have the physical experience of the entire wave passing you regardless of your distance from the speaker. This doesn't change simply because you're in a room smaller than the wavelength........ In either case (the room or hanging off that sky hook) you're stationary - the speaker is stationary - you are positioned in such a manner that certain sound waves never have a chance to fully develop in the space between you and the speaker - the only thing moving is the wave....... Now - within enclosed spaces the room will introduce anomalies that affect what it is you hear simply because a resonance with in the space occurs before your brain has a chance to differentiate between the direct and reflected sounds. Thus a null is a null (to your ear) even though the original wave, in it's entirety, might have passed you before the null took place. However - even waves with lengths longer than room dimensions will still be heard within the space. This is a good thing - otherwise we'd have to build some pretty huge rooms just to be able to hear transmissions at even 30 Hz (roughly 37') Rod | |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Also if small space can't "transmit" low frequencies, closed headphones never will play anything below 2-5kHz. Actually, we obtain a pretty flat response from 4Hz to 25kHz in one room with dimensions 3.5mx3.5mx2.6m (dimensions are before treatment), at listening position. EDIT: (it is essential that we used sealed box design for woofer) | |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2008 Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,585
| Quote:
Right. This is what I was saying is it not? | |
| | |
| | #23 | ||
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2011 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 222
|
Hey Rod, What's up buddy. Quote:
Quote:
Still, I'm a bit confused as to why he wrote "doesn't boost frequencies below it's dimensions". Is that to say that although "a null is a null (to your ear)", a wave that is not fully developed can't form a peak? Surely that's not what was intended. | ||
| | |
| | #24 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2011 Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 222
|
You guys beat me to it. Now, though, I'm really confused. Edit: What do you mean by a small space can't "transmit" low frequencies? |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2008 Location: bk
Posts: 669
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #26 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
This can be (carefully) measured... btw. I learned it through the years, from loudspeaker designers... If i find something more relevant than mere web forums discussions, I will post it here. This phenomenon is mainly measured, and may vary from room to room, no precise modeling exist, for both slope and gain of this LP shelving filter (AFAIK). I understand that you say that small volume space can't transmit low frequencies, and closed headphones are example of (extremely) small volume (space) which can transmit all frequencies down to 20Hz, to our ears, without help of any bigger room. | |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2009 Location: Stockholm
Posts: 3,005
|
Yes, “Room Gain” below the first modal frequency is possible but as said earlier, you need a pretty small room (with very ridged boundaries) and a speaker capable of producing very low frequencies for this to become an issue. The effect can be simulated in the program SoundEasy if anyone has access to it.
|
| | |
| | #28 | |
| The Official | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #29 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2008 Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,585
| Quote:
This room gain idea is new to me. | |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Oct 2011 Location: Winterthur Switzerland
Posts: 188
|
So if a smaller room eliminates lower frequency reinforcement, helping eliminate modal peaks and ringing, why are small rooms considered bad for mixing in esp. in the LF spectrum. I realize we are focusing here on a single principle and it is probably some other that is the root of the problem. This is a grey area. I always thought that because the (small) room cannot support the lower frequencies, this is why they (small rooms) are a problem, but what is said here seems to show that this is good. I'm confused...
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Video Vault:Pensado's Place - #21 - The secrets behind tuning your room! | GS Media | Video Vault | 0 | 13th September 2011 03:04 PM |
| Pensado's Place - Bob Hodas Interview [Acoustic Consultant] | boggy | Studio building / acoustics | 2 | 2nd July 2011 09:21 AM |
| dave pensado - metaphysics and mixing | ninjaneer | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 0 | 23rd August 2007 04:08 PM |
| bobs mic | big country | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 12th June 2007 02:42 AM |
| |