![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear | Proper Speaker Height?
I have a pair of Dynaudio BM6A's These guys: http://www.dynaudioacoustics.com/Default.asp?Id=280 I emailed Dynaudio about the preferred speaker height in relation to ear level and they said there is none. So for audio engineering where should I set these? Is it as simple as tweeter to ear level? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2009 Location: Stockholm
Posts: 3,005
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear Head Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 46
|
the manual states to position the speakers in a way the "horizontal plane and the vertical plane is aiming at the listening position". since they are not saying that the tweeter should aim at the listening position, the bm6a seems to be phase aligned between the tweeter and the woofer and thus the middle of the monitor should point at your ear. now what shall we think about a manufacturer of studio monitors (e.g. accoustic experts) who do not know how to place their own product? peace, rez
__________________ ... what is a signature? |
| | |
| | #5 | ||
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Quote:
, and possibly only person that responds to Keith's email doesn't know this information (it can be expected, if this information wasn't in user manual )BTW, rimshot sound (sample) played in the loop we used sometimes for finding point where phases of midwoofer and tweeter are in the best "harmony" (this means monitor height relatively to ears). Some ear practice may be needed... but trained professionals will find this point "automatically" ![]() Hope this helps Boggy | ||
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear |
+1 - Note: We often recommend that the speakers are placed 'as low as possible' to eliminate early reflections off work surfaces. In some cases, part of the woofer may be obscured by console or desk without affecting the response. Most often it is about compromise as speaker placement in a room full of equipment, desks, & console can become an acoustic minefield. ![]() Cheers, John |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Gear Head Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 46
| Quote:
also this kind of question from the customer should lead to a revision of the user manual if there is no specific answer in it , or no answer at all. this monitors are not that big, so testing a few different heights is not much work. and then keep the height that gives the best results. peace, rez | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 479
|
Measure them yourself if you want the best results. Play some pink noise and point an earthworks or similar mic at them 1 meter away. Wherever you find the desired balance, that's where you want your ears to "point"...
__________________ For mixing, Voxengo SPAN is my most often used tool... it's great when your ears tell you there's something wrong but you can't quite turn the right knob (and it's FREE too!!) |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
I was hoping for a more concrete answer to this inquiry so I could simply cut down a pair if speaker stands to the proper height. Being that my hope hasn't been just that can anyone recommend some adjustable speaker stands other than sound anchors that would be suffice for BM6A's? | |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
:-/ | |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Instead of this try to adjust height when listen rimshot (in the loop) as I suggest above, choose height that sounds best (most natural) to you. With sound of rimshot, you will use your natural audio memory for sounds that you listen very often. Rimshot is similar to Dirac pulse, Dirac pulse is used for acoustical measurements. Cheers, Boggy. | |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Thanks again to everyone for your help. I will definitely post back my final results. Also some adjustable speaker stand suggestions would be great as well. | |
| | |
| | #13 | |||||
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Cheap adjustable stands looks like this QuikLok's BS-300 (or any similar is ok temporarily, click on picture): ![]() And don't believe in weight capacity that is noted in product specifications!!! About half of claimed weight can broke it. Cheers, Boggy | |||||
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear interested |
The thing you want to listen to is the moment when the transient has the most definition. Depending on the sample you're using, you'll hear energy around 200-250 Hz matching the upper mids, and starting to sound fuller.
__________________ www.studiobarba.net |
| | |
| | #15 | ||
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Quote:
Thanks again everyone. | ||
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 479
| Has to be done with mono noise played on stereo speakers, low volume. It works. Sounds crazy, but it works. You can figure height and LR spacing this way quite easily. Again, it sounds nutz... but it works. It's a dynamic process just watch an analyzer graph as you move stuff around. It isn't the most scientific method, or maybe not even scientific at all... but it yields very quick and satisfactory results. Seems more scientific than the rimshot method if you asked me...but the rimshot method is also another trick I use after the noise test to fine tune.
|
| | |
| | #17 | ||
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Quote:
For Windows, and for positioning (in room only, not for proper height) with microphone, I use Spectrum Analuzer that exist in ARTA, with Periodic White Noise (PN White) generator setup... you may see in manual, it is great and detailed. ARTA Download Cheers Boggy. | ||
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 479
| Quote:
what I said really works for me, very well, and fast. It may not be the right way to do it, but for quick setups of nearfields, it's what I do and it works. White noise or pink, doesn't matter, it's not the curve, it's the phasing, hence why you need two speakers with mono noise. I've discussed this on another post and others have agreed that it's a good method to set up by ear even... you want to get it so the noise sounds like it's coming from everywhere in the sound field. I usually find measurements to match up with what my ears tell me. To each his own... some people spend days on waterfall graphs and modal simulations... I've never gotten great results that way personally... unfortunately science and math are only tools to measure reality, they don't define it. If you don't have all the factors available for measurement, which is most often the case, then the simplest answer is the best, for me. | |
| | |