Filling for T'Fusor & MiniFusor - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics


Filling for T'Fusor & MiniFusor

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th June 2011   #1
Lives for gear
 
Rev. Robb's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 812

Thread Starter
Filling for T'Fusor & MiniFusor

What are some of the common materials used to fill these products?

Methods & advise?
Rev. Robb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th June 2011   #2
Lives for gear
 
Rev. Robb's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 812

Thread Starter
Not that anyone cares but I decided to use Great Stuff foam insulation to fill my T'Fusors. Works great!

Spray Foam Insulation | GREAT STUFF? Insulating Foam Sealant
__________________
Respectfully,
Robb

mixing
Rev. Robb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #3
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 76

It's a little too late but an acoustician friend of mine recommended the t-fuser to me and said to fill it with 703.
Best
brandoncross is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 902

shouldn't the mfg provide the recommendation?
localhost127 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #5
Lives for gear
 
boggy's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Location: Belgrade, Serbia
Posts: 755

Send a message via Skype™ to boggy
Quote:
Originally Posted by localhost127 View Post
shouldn't the mfg provide the recommendation?
Good question!!!

Cheers
boggy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #6
NLP
Gear maniac
 
NLP's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 171

Quote:
Originally Posted by brandoncross View Post
It's a little too late but an acoustician friend of mine recommended the t-fuser to me and said to fill it with 703.
Best
Yes, this foam is closed cell type, in acoustics we use open cell foam or wool/ fiber materials.
__________________

NLP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #7
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Akershus,Norway
Posts: 339

It is not neciecerarly wrong to use close cell, depends on the goal.

Close cell will lower the absorption of the scattering device
hsal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #8
NLP
Gear maniac
 
NLP's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 171

Close cells materials are also a resonators.
Another question is how is this audible in practice.
NLP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #9
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Akershus,Norway
Posts: 339

close cell expanding foam will lower the resonance of a structure with thin abs plastic, it will have more mass and require more energy to resonate.
hsal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #10
NLP
Gear maniac
 
NLP's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 171

Also the open cell will do same thing but will not resonate.
But like I said: " Another question is how is this audible in practice. "
NLP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #11
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Akershus,Norway
Posts: 339

Quote:
Another question is how is this audible in practice.
It depends on the surface area being covered, another point with filling the cavity, is that it can make the surface more reflective for lower mids, that might otherwise go thru the thin plastic.
hsal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #12
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Akershus,Norway
Posts: 339

Quote:
Also the open cell will do same thing but will not resonate.
It will dampen the shell, but in the process add absoprtion.

as said, the effect depends on surface area covered, cut-of frequensy for sound that are not reflected (that go thru and will be reflected by the wall behind).

the goal dictates the sollution (close/open cell foam)
hsal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #13
NLP
Gear maniac
 
NLP's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 171

Yes I agree.
A few diffusers filled that way are not a problem but large surfaces will be.
NLP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #14
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Akershus,Norway
Posts: 339

Quote:
Yes I agree.
A few diffusers filled that way are not a problem but large surfaces will be.
I don`t think there is a definitive rule of thumb, it depends on the nature of the room.
hsal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #15
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Akershus,Norway
Posts: 339

I think I misunderstood this
Quote:
Yes I agree.
A few diffusers filled that way are not a problem but large surfaces will be. Yes I agree.
A few diffusers filled that way are not a problem but large surfaces will be.
Close cell will lower absorption, if one wants lower absorption the effect will be even more noticable (benificial ) when larger areas are covered and the cavity filled with closed cell foam.
hsal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #16
NLP
Gear maniac
 
NLP's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 171

Yes also that... otherwise try, experiment with closed cell foam if you do not believe.
NLP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #17
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Akershus,Norway
Posts: 339

I have.
hsal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #18
NLP
Gear maniac
 
NLP's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 171

Fine.
So closed cell foam is better in acoustics than open cell and fibre materials.
NLP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #19
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Akershus,Norway
Posts: 339

No it depends on the nature of the
room, and the use.

There are many skyline diffusors made by solid blocks (cut out) of close cell foam with a density similar to expanding foam.
hsal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #20
NLP
Gear maniac
 
NLP's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 171

Yes I know about EPS diffusors.
This is a budget solution and acoustics compromise.:(
NLP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #21
Lives for gear
 
johndykstra's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,585

who's on first?
johndykstra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #22
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Akershus,Norway
Posts: 339

eps is not an acoustic compromise

do a search
hsal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #23
NLP
Gear maniac
 
NLP's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 171

Fine
Consult with skilled acoustician.
NLP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #24
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Akershus,Norway
Posts: 339

Edit

NLP, can you give me the reason for it being an acoustic compromise?
hsal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #25
NLP
Gear maniac
 
NLP's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 171

For closed cell foam and EPS and XPS is no place in acoustics thats all in briefly.
NLP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #26
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Location: Akershus,Norway
Posts: 339

skyline is consructed by acousticans
and Jens Eklund on this forum (acoustican) has constructed a diffusor out of eps

I`ll call it a day

good night
hsal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #27
NLP
Gear maniac
 
NLP's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 171

Yes and?!
This is budget solution.
Bye and do not believe a hype.
NLP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #28
Lives for gear
 
johndykstra's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Location: Midwest
Posts: 4,585

Quote:
Originally Posted by NLP View Post
For closed cell foam and EPS and XPS is no place in acoustics thats all in briefly.

It has no absorptive properties. That doesn't mean it isn't useful or a compromise. Sometimes it's the exact right thing. Sometimes it's useless.
__________________
phantom power doesn't make your voice sound spooky
johndykstra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th June 2011   #29
NLP
Gear maniac
 
NLP's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 171

Yes...
Try an extreme experiment: isolate the room inside with EPS... for heat insulation point of view is ok but for inner acosutics is not a desired thing.

If you fill a "diffusor mask" with closed cell foam is not such a big thing ok... but a large uncovered EPS surfaces are not OK.
NLP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st July 2011   #30
Lives for gear
 
Jens Eklund's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 3,005

EPS is an utterly useless material in regards to acoustic isolation or treatment except diffuser construction, since it is light and reflective:

http://www.gearslutz.com/board/6732069-post5.html

especially if painted. The only real downside of EPS (if used for diffusers) is the lower durability compared to wood or steal but the price difference is gigantic.


/Jens Eklund
Jens Eklund is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Software for generating fills for basic drum patterns? ektia So much gear, so little time! 12 8th March 2009 06:00 PM
If you could only get one filling for your lunchbox Andy Spence High end 14 21st November 2007 06:50 PM
Codename Baby9K-- A great idea for mobile & location recording jindrich Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 71 16th November 2007 03:53 PM
recording in stereo using matched mics & pres but different compressors for L & R? ine-kpro... High end 2 12th April 2007 08:27 AM
URS N & A now also as VST for Mac & Win DrDeltaM So much gear, so little time! 36 6th February 2005 08:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:12 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.