Acoustic panels: bigger, or smaller? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics


Acoustic panels: bigger, or smaller?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th March 2011   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 9

Thread Starter
Acoustic panels: bigger, or smaller?

Hey All,

I am having acoustic panels built for a small studio, used mainly for vocal recordings with quite a roomy sound to it. I can only treat two of the opposing walls, as the other two walls have a cupboard and window facing each other.

Now, should I rather have two very large panels built - 1.2m x 1.8m - for the walls facing each other, or should I rather have three smaller panels of 60cm x 1.2m built for each wall?

I have attached a sketch of the room.

Thanks!
pashabel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2011   #2
SAC
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,622

Might I suggest that you first determine the regions requiring absorption in order to control the early reflections off the side walls and the ceiling using wither the mirror techniques or the ETC response from a program such as RoomEQWizard.

The coverage required of the panels is a function of actual need, not our opinion. The actual coverage requirements will provide a much better answer to your question than our guesses will!


This will tell you the actual regions that must be treated and from this you can better determine what dimension panels will provide optimal coverage.

Also, you are going to NEED to address room modes.

Edit room comment regarding closet - as I mistakenly thought the diagram in another post was the room... ) The rest stands...
SAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2011   #3
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 59

I'm not seeing an attachment.

Dan
JohnTheRevelator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th March 2011   #4
Gear interested
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 9

Thread Starter
Sorry, here is the attachment:
Attached Thumbnails
Acoustic panels: bigger, or smaller?-studio.gif  
pashabel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2011   #5
Gear interested
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 7

Smaller panels?... (much smaller)

You might want to consider ordering smaller panels (600 x 600mm) and position them as you need them - adding as you go if you find you need more...

http://www.offecct.se/img/product_img/flo_antracit_d.jpg

Flo is designed to be used as lightweight sound absorbers in the upper frequency range (500 Hz and above). These panels help reduce disturbing sound reflections.
MattBullen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2011   #6
Lives for gear
 
Steab's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Location: Greece
Posts: 1,064

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattBullen View Post
You might want to consider ordering smaller panels (600 x 600mm) and position them as you need them - adding as you go if you find you need more...

http://www.offecct.se/img/product_img/flo_antracit_d.jpg

Flo is designed to be used as lightweight sound absorbers in the upper frequency range (500 Hz and above). These panels help reduce disturbing sound reflections.
Hey, great website and products!
Steab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2011   #7
Gear interested
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 9

Thread Starter
Thanks, Matt!
pashabel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st April 2011   #8
SAC
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,622

While we are pushing a vested commercial product line, how about listing prices.

They will impress too.


And as far as the 'proper' size for panels, that is worded too generally. It is a case of 'they need to be large enough to do the job'. As semi-rigid panels are normally supplied in 2'x4' panels, there is no need to cut them down any further and simply increase the labor and framing relative to the coverage.

2' x 4' is a very manageable modular format that can be used individually or paired with additional panels as needed.

And as far as how much is required, that is what the ETC measurements are for!!! They will tell you how large an incident area must be treated. The size of the incident region and the gain of the reflection will vary with distance from the source, so no meaningful generalization can be provided. That is why we make measurements, and why one has their vital statistics measured each time you go to the doctor rather than someone merely looking at a statistical chart and entering the average height and weight of a (fill in the blank=X) year old man or woman.


{Oh, and can you imagine if Elvis were still alive and he saw that Barney purple? (Sorry, for the rest of you, you will understand after you tour Graceland!) Personally, I avoid it unless it can be mated with a nice bright orange and lime green - in a plaid if possible.... }

Last edited by SAC; 1st April 2011 at 10:19 PM..
SAC is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
acoustic panels: frame vs. backing 3rdwave Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 10 13th February 2011 06:00 PM
Mineral wool panels: Backing or open tommydorky Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 2 5th January 2011 06:02 PM
Bigger or smaller desk? Mr. Dreq Low End Theory 1 17th October 2006 07:38 PM
DPA mics for acoustic guitar, 4041 or 4003? wyomingbound Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 16 14th April 2006 08:26 AM
Bigger or smaller studio? Revilo High end 6 19th January 2006 01:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:51 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.