Bass port facing wall - problem? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics


Bass port facing wall - problem?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th February 2011   #1
Lives for gear
 
Liquid Shadow's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 608

Thread Starter
Bass port facing wall - problem?

My studio monitors (Alesis M1Active 620) have rear-facing bass ports that are about 5 inches from the wall. I have 12 panels of OC703 coming (ATS exact substitute actually, for $10 cheaper) and I'm going to put them in the corners. I know they are not the 4" FRKs but these will have to do for now.

My question is should I be worried about the rear-facing bass ports and do something about it? Like maybe put a panel on the wall behind the speaker? I know this may sound dumb because I have never seen other people do that.

Side question: the panels are 48x24, which is really too big for the corners in my room. I planning on cutting a couple of them length-wise, so they'll be 48x12. This will be way more corner-friendly for my room and I understand that the space between the panel and the corner will be much smaller, but I figured it's still better than nothing. You guys think this is a good plan?
__________________

Opus Zero Recording and Audio
www.opuszeroaudio.com
Liquid Shadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2011   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 755

To my knowledge, placing a rear-ported speaker against the wall is effectively lengthening the port, which lowers the port frequency. That is, if the space is about the diameter of the port, or less.
I don't see a technical problem with 5" distance. What might be a problem is a vibrating wall.

A simple measurement will tell you how much lower the port frequency is.
If you have some sort of sound pressure meter.
Use a variable sine wave generator on 30-50 herz (or use software, or make a series of frequencies on your DAW), and find the frequency with the lowest output on the s.p. meter, close to the woofer cone.
This is the port frequency.
Do this with the box freestanding, and close to the wall.

Don't know about panels, but I think that they don't work on low frequencies (30-40 herz) anyway.
LeeYoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2011   #3
SAC
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,622

You can simply leave a space equal to or greater than the width of the port in order to avoid loading the port...in other words 4" from the wall or boundary.

This spacing will provide an area in the lateral directions equal to the port area, thus preventing additional back pressure and loading.

How you can calculate this (all units are inches):

the cross-sectional area of the port = Pi(r^2) = 50.2656
the min. area of the required spaced band = the area of the port = 50.2656
the circumference of the port forming the length (L) of the spaced band = 2pi(r) = 12.566
the area of the spaced band = L x W >= 50.2656 = 12.566(W) = 50.2656; W= 50.2656/12.566 =~4
SAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2011   #4
Lives for gear
 
Liquid Shadow's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 608

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeYoo View Post
To my knowledge, placing a rear-ported speaker against the wall is effectively lengthening the port, which lowers the port frequency. That is, if the space is about the diameter of the port, or less. I don't see a technical problem with 5" distance. What might be a problem is a vibrating wall.
Don't know about panels, but I think that they don't work on low frequencies (30-40 herz) anyway.
You're right that the panels probably won't do anything to those low frequencies, I guess I should just leave them be?
Liquid Shadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2011   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 755

Hi sac,

The area of the port - Pi(r^2) = 50.2656
Do you mean the hole?
? in square inches?

Looks like about 1.5-2" dia port to me, that makes it less then 3.5 square inch.
LeeYoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2011   #6
SAC
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,622

Somhow in skimming the figure of 4" for the port stuck.
I have no idea what the actual port diameter is. And such positioning limitations are one reason that I am not a fan of rear and side facing components in a loudspeaker with a supposed controlled Q/dispersion.

But the numbers are insignificant - the math is still valid. So instead of a radius=2", substitute the actual radius of the port into the formulas.

But generally, whatever the port diameter, you simply keep the speaker that distance away from the boundary.
SAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2011   #7
Lives for gear
 
Liquid Shadow's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 608

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAC View Post
But generally, whatever the port diameter, you simply keep the speaker that distance away from the boundary.
Got it, thanks. Right now the distance between the port and the wall is definitely way bigger than the diameter of the port itself.
Liquid Shadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2011   #8
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 755

Found a picture of the back on the net, and estimated the size from there.
Happy with the 4" minimum distance.
LeeYoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th February 2011   #9
Gear addict
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 339

What about a rectangular port? Much the same I suppose?

T
tonio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2011   #10
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 755

If the distance is more than the average port diameter, and the air can escape 4 ways, there should not be a big problem with port frequency change.
LeeYoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2011   #11
Lives for gear
 
Rod Gervais's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Central Village CT
Posts: 1,687

Folks,

I have a novel idea..... (don't have em often so I get excited when I do) why not read the manufacturer's set up instructions in the manual........ ??????

Rod
Rod Gervais is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2011   #12
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 755

Yeah!!


And then make a list on GS of the manufacturers you can trust.
LeeYoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2011   #13
SAC
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,622

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeYoo View Post
And then make a list on GS of the manufacturers you can trust.

You mean of the manufacturers who actually provide valid full range polar response plots, and information regarding spatial loading response curves and possible emphasis settings to compensate for a variety of spatial loading scenarios?

Hmmmm...but that would come dangerously close to making sense.

And that wouldn't look nearly as nice as the embossed free field anechoic response plot that almost all of the manuals feature... and which corresponds to none of the intended uses...



On the other hand, the fact that so many make these units with ports or radiators firing to the back and or sides should provide an ample hint that such options were never intended, nor probably even considered.
SAC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2011   #14
Gear addict
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: San Diego
Posts: 339

Rod,

Brilliant idea!! unfortunately most mfg's do not have much info, other than an equalateral triangle set up.

I have Dynaudio BM6A's which are not cheap. Any suggestions as to what price point would a mfr even provide a full on instructions , not to mention polar plots etc?
tonio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2011   #15
Gear Head
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 59

JBL puts a lot of pertinent info into their middle line of monitors on up. Sad thing is that all these companies should have this info on hand as they should be making it to design and tweak the speaker into 'good enough for the money'.

I haven't seen as much info on any other monitors.

The sad state of audio,

Dan
JohnTheRevelator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2011   #16
Lives for gear
 
Rod Gervais's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Central Village CT
Posts: 1,687

Quote:
Originally Posted by tonio View Post
Rod,

Brilliant idea!! unfortunately most mfg's do not have much info, other than an equalateral triangle set up.

I have Dynaudio BM6A's which are not cheap. Any suggestions as to what price point would a mfr even provide a full on instructions , not to mention polar plots etc?
I would assume that the info is available upon request - but my response was for the OP - when I went on-line and looked at the manufacturer's documentation they were very specific as to how to handle single and corner boundaries with their speakers.........

Which makes me wonder why one would not just check the documentation.

Rod
Rod Gervais is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2011   #17
Lives for gear
 
Rod Gervais's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Central Village CT
Posts: 1,687

Quote:
Originally Posted by tonio View Post
Rod,

Brilliant idea!! unfortunately most mfg's do not have much info, other than an equalateral triangle set up.

I have Dynaudio BM6A's which are not cheap. Any suggestions as to what price point would a mfr even provide a full on instructions , not to mention polar plots etc?
Tonio,

They have excellent documentation on those speakers (as regards setting them up - dealing with boundaries, etc.) - just for the heck of it I have requested further information than they provide on their website - I will let you know how they reply.........

Rod
Rod Gervais is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2011   #18
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 755

Two separate problems in these posts.

1. The de-tuning of the port when facing a wall. This was the original question.

2. The effect of placing a speakerbox (any speakerbox) against a wall, or in a corner. This should be textbook stuff.
LeeYoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2011   #19
Lives for gear
 
Liquid Shadow's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 608

Thread Starter
Of course I have read the manual, they have a bass density switch on the back. The problem is I CANNOT move the monitors, I was merely asking if it's a problem and if I can improve things with some OC703.
Liquid Shadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2011   #20
Lives for gear
 
Rod Gervais's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Central Village CT
Posts: 1,687

Quote:
Originally Posted by Liquid Shadow View Post
Of course I have read the manual, they have a bass density switch on the back. The problem is I CANNOT move the monitors, I was merely asking if it's a problem and if I can improve things with some OC703.
Asking us if it is a problem is difficult for us to answer, seeing as we are not there - and cannot listen to (or test) what is happening inside of the room.........

I take it that there is a problem - seeing as you wish to know if it can be solved with 703 - but you have not yet stated what the problem is, what extent of treatment there is (already) in the room or any other information about the room that would lead to an answer any more generalized than you have already received.

Rod
Rod Gervais is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd March 2011   #21
Lives for gear
 
Liquid Shadow's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Posts: 608

Thread Starter
Don't worry about it.
Liquid Shadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th April 2011   #22
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 454

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rod Gervais View Post
I would assume that the info is available upon request - but my response was for the OP - when I went on-line and looked at the manufacturer's documentation they were very specific as to how to handle single and corner boundaries with their speakers.........

Which makes me wonder why one would not just check the documentation.

Rod

Hey Rod. would you mind posting a link to the information that you found regarding these monitors? When I went to the Alesis site and clicked on the link for the manual I was directed to a page that wanted some personal info including email and such. Not a problem,but I just hate to get on another mailing list. Did you just go ahead and submit your personal info simply to get a pdf of the manual?

Thanks

fb
__________________
I think I might,maybe,might just be over it,but just can't tell?!
foamboy is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Facing Shortest/longest wall - monitor position advice (2m vs 2.8) l.sicilian Studio building / acoustics 6 3rd August 2010 12:00 AM
Front wall treatment vs monitor port design tonio Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 10 24th May 2010 02:10 PM
Drums facing the wall directly templejazz82 Studio building / acoustics 2 2nd January 2010 07:45 AM
Plasterboard wall ceiling problem - studs or joists seem to be set back from wall?? ZAZ Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 1 26th September 2009 07:57 AM
Monitor port and rear wall Igotsoul4u Studio building / acoustics 3 17th October 2008 05:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.