![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 8
Thread Starter | Reflexion-filter: need review on Alctron PF30
Hi guys! As I'm on a hard budget I really want to know if anyone has tried the Alctron PF30 reflexion-filter? I know there are several discussions on reflexion-filters, so please only answer if you know anything about this specific product... I can't find any reviews on it. The SE Electronics-reflexion-filter is good, but it's almost three times the price. Thanks! |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear |
The word Reflexion is a TM of the SE company. Actually you need a reflection panel behind the singer to cut room ambiance. Most vocal microphones are Cardiod Pattern and do not require absorption behind them. I would recommend something from Realtraps, or GIK, or build yourself. Note: these little 'gobos' do not compensate for an untreated room. I put the SE sight on my VooDoo list because they continue to push this myth in order to sell their products. ![]() Cheers, John |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear interested Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 8
Thread Starter |
Ok - thanks for your reply... I'll sleep on what to do a while longer..., maybe I find that the do-it-yourself-solution is alright... It's just that it does take a while to set up temporary stuff all the time... |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2004 Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 3,699
| |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 12,011
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear interested Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 8
Thread Starter |
Thanks for all answers... As it happens I actually did buy a reflexion-filter, and even though I'm sure you're right that the biggest need for absorbing ambience is behind the singer, it still does some work in a home studio. My experience is 1. it looks cool 2. eventual noise from computer etc IS reduced 3. it does reduce ambience, just not perfectly 4. singers may easier consentrate on actually singing, not how they look, how the producer looks or that clock on the wall etc... ![]() So I'm actually satisfied, a thing like this doesn't make things perfect, but better than without. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| sE Reflexion Filter | DJShowtime | Low End Theory | 2 | 30th June 2006 01:02 AM |
| |