![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Registered User Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 321
Thread Starter | Listening position in a small room
For those of you in a small room or just anyone who has any input, here's my situation: 10X10X8 room, not so good of a size. I've been experimenting with listening positions and it seems that things sound the best to me when I sit wayyyy back. Using the 38% rule and using the equilateral triangle, it actually puts me at dead in the middle of the room which is supposedly a terrible thing. When I sit at 50% of the room and even more toward the monitors, I lose bass response like you wouldn't believe. I've discovered that moving back a couple feet brings back all of the 'oomph' in the bass that had been missing, but that's putting me just a couple feet off the back wall. So, my listening position is like this. I've got my monitors about 4 and a half feet apart near the front wall, but I've got to sit back a bit more than that to get the oomph that's missing remember? So that means my monitors are 4 and a half feet apart and I'm sitting rougly 6 feet away from them, which puts me just a couple feet off the back wall. That means the triangle isn't going to be possible, and I'm not sure if the 'focal point' I think it's called is very important and I'll need to let that hit my ears perfectly. It should be a couple feet in front of me or so since I'm back 6 feet and monitors have the 4' triangle going on. That's about all the info that I can give you. I wanted to know what everyone thinks of this and what they'd do in the same situation. One last question - if I've got my monitors 4 feet apart but I sit 6 feet away, should I move the monitors apart a bit more? However, that'd mean they'd be near the corners of the room. Using my elite photoshop skills, I was able to come up with this diagram. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2005 Location: St. Louis(Wildwood), MO
Posts: 764
|
Not sure how sitting at 38% is putting you at the middle of the room. Seated ear position would be either 3.8' or 6.2' from the wall in front of you. I'd think sitting 6.2' from ears to front wall would still allow you to have the monitors closer to the front wall for bottom end reinforcement. Play with monitor spacing trying to keep baffle to wall behind and center of drivers to side wall at a different dimension. In a smaller square room like that, you're going to need a good amount of broadband bass control to smooth things out. I suspect that would give you a lot more flexibility. Right now, you're going to have peaks and nulls everywhere. Bryan
__________________ I am serious, and don't call me Shirley Bryan Pape Lead Acoustical Designer GIK Acoustics |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,334
| Quote:
--Ethan
__________________ Ethan's audio book is now available! | |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 12,007
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Registered User Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 321
Thread Starter |
Here's the deal. If I use the 38% rule and sit 3'8" like mentioned above, that will put me at about 5 feet back from the front wall which is 50% of the room (which is - so I've heard - an absolutely terrible position, and it's where all of the bass disappears). The reason being that I've got to take the monitors into account as well (depth). 3 feet 8 inches versus 5 feet isn't that much, but in a small room, it can mean a lot. The depth of the monitors is about a foot from the front wall, so that's 4'8 feet, which would equal around 5 feet in total (puts me at 50% mark). I've discussed all of this with Frank and we both came to the conclusion that sitting back would be my best bet, but I wanted to get some other advice/opinions here about it. I've tested with my ears a lot, and sitting back that far just seems so much more full. No matter what I do, moving forward a bit always takes lots out the bass response that I need when monitoring, or else I'll use wayyyy too much bass in my mixes. By the way - I've got trapping in there and I'm about to double up on what I have as well. I'm doing the best I can with the trapping - that'll take care of itself, so it's really just a matter of finding the most accurate listening position now. |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Moderator Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,389
| Quote:
50% of the room is indeed bad, which is why 38% is better. You can also go 38% from the back wall instead of the front. This often helps in small rooms, but you'll probably want some absorption behind you in that case. Also, 38% is a starting guideline only, and since it was originally conceived for soffit mounted monitors, you're already changing the variables before you even begin. It's a good place to start, but by no means "a rule" that works every time, or even a lot of the time. It's usually at least in the ballpark, and you adjust as necessary. | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2009 Location: Brasil
Posts: 613
|
50% placement is a null point of the first mode (around 56hz for L/W and 72hz for height).You should expect a "hole" at this points. Unfortunatelly for height dimension 50% is 4', a common ear (technician) and woofer level (speakers). Try everything that´s possible (speaker + your position + measurements with software). And more bass traps, for sure (in a room that size, a bigger area) will helps to minimize this nasty nulls and peaks , even when the ideal (or "near") placement is not possible. Ciro |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Registered User Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 321
Thread Starter |
Thanks for the replies. If I do sit at 38% of the room or at 50%, the bass response disappears and I need it there because I was putting way too much in there. All I can say is that when I move farther back, it sounds much better and I can keep things under control better there than anywhere else. a 10X10 foot room is what I've got to deal with, and my ears are telling me a bit farther back is best. In fact, that's putting me in the ballpark of the 38% rule but from the back of the room like mentioned above. The math pf this says one thing, but my ears tell me differently ![]() I've got more bass trapping coming and things will improve a bit. I've still got more testing to do. I'll be posting those whenever I get my new trapping, in multiple listening positions! |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 12,007
| Quote:
| |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 5.1 Listening position - Question? | Waltz Mastering | Mastering forum | 7 | 11th April 2009 07:55 PM |
| Small Control Room Construction: Advice on mix position, bass traps, diffusers, etc. | Daedalus77 | Studio building / acoustics | 5 | 29th June 2008 04:24 PM |
| how should i position my pa ina small room? | NA-UL | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 20th April 2008 05:06 PM |
| Room layout and listening position | Victor_Stoian | Studio building / acoustics | 17 | 26th February 2008 10:51 PM |
| Listening position in 22 foot long room? | vaesion | Geekslutz forum | 6 | 1st April 2007 06:20 AM |
| |