A few questions after first measurement - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics


A few questions after first measurement

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th April 2009   #1
Gear addict
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 443

Thread Starter
A few questions after first measurement

Hi.
So i measured my room yesterday with my new ecm8000 just to demo and see how things work out!
So now i know, my room kinda sux :P but thats not a problem, i guess.

I was surprised to see some differences after measuring my room several times in a row, with no changes (mic pos, volume etc) at all! Everything under 40hz-50hz was just random it seemed! I had some differences at 50 and 70hz as well. Mostly those were at max at 2db, so nothing big. Im just curious.

My tascam vl a-5 apparently go down to 38hz and the ecm8000 should be able to cope with that too, so not sure why its just random and the changes at 50 and 70hz.
I measured with very long sweeps (10s) with start silence (5s) and end silence (1s) and an averaging of 8 sweeps, per meassurement.

Im also very surprised, my left and right speaker have huge differences in the low end! at around 75hz (which is a general problem in my room it seems) it adds up to 15db difference between L and R channel!!! This seems weird to me, since i have tried to build up as symmetrical as possible, so the back wall is the same distance from both speakers, im pretty much in the middle of the room (though the right wall is 1.6m and the left wall is 2.1m away). But can that make such a huge difference?

Last but not least, im quite surprised by the fall of the top end. after 6khz the graph just falls down quite strongly, a total of -17 from 6-20khz. I had the ecm8000 pointing upwards, heard that this was the better way to measure. This does surprise me a little since our ear has the least absorbion in front, so i would think pointing the mic that way would be the most logical...

I will make more meassurements in the next days and find out the problems better, just want to make sure im doin things right :P
nixoblivion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2009   #2
Lives for gear
 
Weasel9992's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 4,339

Send a message via AIM to Weasel9992
Differences between the left and right are actually really common. As far as placement goes, you should have the mic at ear level (seated, so about 45" or so), right in between the speakers. What preamp are you using?

Frank
__________________
Frank
Weasel9992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2009   #3
Gear Guru
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,334

Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by nixoblivion View Post
Everything under 40hz-50hz was just random it seemed!
What software did you use to measure? Regardless, that's a clear tip-off that you have truck traffic or other such LF noise leaking into the room. If you play the test tones 10 dB louder is there less randomness? If so, that proves it's noise.

--Ethan
Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2009   #4
Gear addict
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 443

Thread Starter
Thx for the replies.
yes. i had the mic at ear level, so right between speakers at hear height, pointing upwards.
im using an mbox2 as preamp. i use fuzzmeasure as software.

i actually have no road outside, so it cant be that. but maybe there was some other low frequency noise around. i will test again tomorrow or so, and then ill see.

what was also a little weird, was that the waterfall only showed ringing over 100hz. my graph shows quite a fall under 100hz, so maybe its that. still i was surprised since in most waterfall diagrams their are problems at lower frequencies (50, 70 or something the like)
nixoblivion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2009   #5
Lives for gear
 
ciro's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: Brasil
Posts: 613

Quote:
Originally Posted by nixoblivion View Post
Im also very surprised, my left and right speaker have huge differences in the low end... This seems weird to me, since i have tried to build up as symmetrical as possible, so the back wall is the same distance from both speakers, im pretty much in the middle of the room (though the right wall is 1.6m and the left wall is 2.1m away). But can that make such a huge difference?
You need symetry in the front wall.
Anyway,this 50 cm difference will give you different L/R low response.

My (bad) experience with my old position in the room:
*different distance monitors/adjacent walls (not 50cm, but near) + a door in the front (right)side of the room = -5 or 6 dbs in the lows of "R" speaker and very different individual L/R measured/audible response.
And poor stereo image.

I swapped it 180° (and added more 9 or 10 traps)
and now it´s ok

Thanks - Ethan Winer/Real Traps and GIK site for the valuable information and Bryan Pape for all the great advices.

Ciro
ciro is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Measurement software gainreduction Studio building / acoustics 16 10th February 2009 04:00 PM
Measurement Mics aussie_techie So much gear, so little time! 1 2nd April 2008 06:37 PM
Recommendations for Measurement PC thadman Music computers 4 20th February 2008 04:59 PM
What do you need for room measurement? deve Studio building / acoustics 1 31st December 2007 10:57 AM
measurement microphone ?'s Pistolpete Low End Theory 11 2nd January 2007 07:52 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:53 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.