brick walls vs. old plaster walls - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics


brick walls vs. old plaster walls

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th April 2009   #1
Gear nut
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 86

Thread Starter
brick walls vs. old plaster walls

I'm working on my studio. It's a converted old apartment, with nice high ceilings, (newly refinished) hardwood floors, and old plaster walls (the plaster is in fine shape. Underneath the plaster is brick.

Should I knock down the plaster?

Does plaster vs. brick make a whole hell of a difference, as far as reflections goes, or does exposed brick just look cooler?

Thoughts? Comments? Concerns?
D.Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #2
Gear maniac
 
mikahanau's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: Germany /Frankfurt
Posts: 227

When there is no airgap between the plaster and the brick, then leave the plaster in position, since more mass gives better isolation.
When there is a airgap between, you have to calculate if there is advantage in leaving the plaster in position based on the typical double-leave calculation.
cheers
mika
mikahanau is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 9th April 2009   #3
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,678

Quote:
Originally Posted by D.Williams View Post
I'm working on my studio. It's a converted old apartment, with nice high ceilings, (newly refinished) hardwood floors, and old plaster walls (the plaster is in fine shape. Underneath the plaster is brick.

Should I knock down the plaster?

Does plaster vs. brick make a whole hell of a difference, as far as reflections goes, or does exposed brick just look cooler?

Thoughts? Comments? Concerns?
In my experience brick is 100 times better as a wall in a recording room....I haven't done any measurements but I find it (way) less reflective and the reflections you do get are "nicer" than plaster (I'm assuming a smooth plaster finsh)...that would be mid to high frequency reflections I'm talking about...I assume this is do to the uneven finish of brick and the very porous nature/density of the brick...although it would depend on the brick of course

Nick
nickynicknick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2009   #4
Gear maniac
 
AnthonySpinali's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 248

Don't assume it's just as easy as knocking the plaster down. The bricks that are used inside like that were never intended to be seen and the mortar will look terrible. Many people tear out the plaster and don't fix the brick wall. This can be bad because the mortar may be loose and start to fall out. If you like that it looks rough you can seal it. I've heard that old-timers sealed the walls with linseed oil but I would verify that before I tried it. If you want it to look like a nice brick wall, well........ I really don't know what to say. Maybe lay a new wall.
AnthonySpinali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2009   #5
Gear nut
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 86

Thread Starter
Anthony- I'd never considered that. Thanks for throwing that knowledge my way. I have seen exposed brick in various studios, and I agree that it does add a nice flavor, but it would be a huge disaster to pull the plaster down only to be faced with bad brick.

The building is 115 years old, so anything's possible. Though would it make a difference if it was an interior wall?

Thanks,
D.
D.Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2009   #6
Gear maniac
 
AnthonySpinali's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 248

First off, I'm not a brick layer, so I don't know the history. But I came up in the construction business Renovating 100 year old Dutch Town houses on the South Side of St. Louis. I have tons of experience re-plastering those old walls. I can say with great deal of certainty that the builder never imagined anyone was gonna look at the brick job.

Having said that, just because it's ugly doesn't mean it won't sound awesome. And it will just look real rough. You can clean it up so that it doesn't look like it's falling down. In the St. Louis Lofts, people like that real rough look and expose all the brick they can. And these Lofts go for $300,000-$400,000 sometimes so it's not half-ass.

To do a professional job I would tear out all the plaster, then call a tuckpointer and have him repair any loose mortar joints. Then i would seal it (maybe the tuckpointer would know what to do), but remember that the reason you're exposing the brick is to get a certain sound. You don't want to use a sealer that could ruin the natural quality of the sound. I would do some serious research to find someone who has done it with your application in mind. (I don't think that if you had someone build a false brick wall for your studio you wouldn't need to seal it. That's why I'm so uncertain as to whether it would affect the sound. Maybe if it's properly tuckpointed sealing the brick is unnecesary.) You could also go to a local brick supplier. I find that those kind of people love to talk about bricks.

If you need advice on repairing plaster I can help with that too....
AnthonySpinali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2009   #7
Gear maniac
 
AnthonySpinali's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 248

Quote:
Originally Posted by D.Williams View Post
The building is 115 years old, so anything's possible. Though would it make a difference if it was an interior wall?
Well, interior walls in a house that old (It's a little older than houses here) are usually rough cut 2x4s with wood lats then plaster. Occasionally you'll find an interior wall that is brick. This usually means that, at one time, that was an exterior wall and they added on to the building. However, sometimes brick interior walls function as the "Load Bearing" walls. In a house that old all walls are "Load Bearing" but that's a different conversation. I've only seen that in basements but I'm sure it happens. It'll still be a rough back there but the mortar will probably be in better shape. Good luck!
AnthonySpinali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2009   #8
Lives for gear
 
andrebrito's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Posts: 998

Quote:
When there is no airgap between the plaster and the brick, then leave the plaster in position, since more mass gives better isolation.
This is pratically the same. A brick is way more heavy than a plaster board. Sound insulation of a brick and brick+plaster is identical.

About the reflectivity of brick versus plaster, plaster is LESS reflective than brick.
__________________
Singer/Songwriter/Producer/Acoustical Engineer

http://www.onlineacoustics.com - Acoustics !

http://www.mel-music.com
- project of mine with a female singer

http://www.sonicflames.com - Indie Label & Audio/Music Services

http://www.spinousmusic.com
- my one man band project
andrebrito is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2009   #9
Gear nut
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 86

Thread Starter
Hahaha!

Anthony-

I too am in South St. Louis. near Jefferson and 44. It's an old 4-family, and I'm converting one of the apartments. That's why the interior all is brick; the building (looking at the front from the outside) would be apartments, then two sets of interior stairways, then apartments.

It's a tough call. While the exposed brick is definitely an aesthetic I enjoy, and my dad used to do tuckpointing, I certainly don't want to get in over my head...

Thanks for the advice, everyone!

-D
D.Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2009   #10
Lives for gear
 
Weasel9992's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 4,339

Send a message via AIM to Weasel9992
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnthonySpinali View Post
Don't assume it's just as easy as knocking the plaster down. The bricks that are used inside like that were never intended to be seen and the mortar will look terrible. Many people tear out the plaster and don't fix the brick wall. This can be bad because the mortar may be loose and start to fall out. If you like that it looks rough you can seal it. I've heard that old-timers sealed the walls with linseed oil but I would verify that before I tried it. If you want it to look like a nice brick wall, well........ I really don't know what to say. Maybe lay a new wall.
Plus tearing out plaster (with the lathing, of course) SUCKS. It's messy and difficult. That said, the old brickwork underneath may have that kinda unfinished vibe that might look pretty cool.

Good to know that someone around here has this kind of experience...now I know who to go to for plaster questions.

Frank
__________________
Frank
Weasel9992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2009   #11
Gear nut
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 86

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weasel9992 View Post
Plus tearing out plaster (with the lathing, of course) SUCKS. It's messy and difficult. That said, the old brickwork underneath may have that kinda unfinished vibe that might look pretty cool.

Good to know that someone around here has this kind of experience...now I know who to go to for plaster questions.

Frank
Dear god yes. I've been tearing out old plaster and lathing since I moved in a year ago. It is AWFUL!
D.Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2009   #12
Gear maniac
 
stuntbutt's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 261

Dang, we got South City all over this place.
stuntbutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2009   #13
Gear nut
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 86

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by stuntbutt View Post
Dang, we got South City all over this place.
Hell yes! Represent!
D.Williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th April 2009   #14
Gear maniac
 
AnthonySpinali's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 248

Quote:
Originally Posted by stuntbutt View Post
Dang, we got South City all over this place.
If you need a contractor I'm always available! Just PM me!
AnthonySpinali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2009   #15
Gear maniac
 
AnthonySpinali's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 248

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrebrito View Post
This is pratically the same. A brick is way more heavy than a plaster board. Sound insulation of a brick and brick+plaster is identical.

About the reflectivity of brick versus plaster, plaster is LESS reflective than brick.
What about painted or stained plaster concerning reflectivity? Do you have any thoughts on the preferred studio application... I could feasibly plaster all my walls if that would give me some significant benefit over just drywall. Does it only work if it's solid to brick?
AnthonySpinali is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Building off of two walls HeWhoisI Studio building / acoustics 2 12th August 2008 12:36 PM
Safely securing panels to plaster/brick walls csl Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 5 26th June 2008 03:00 PM
Live venue, brick walls, unknown ceiling. Almy Studio building / acoustics 2 14th May 2008 12:15 AM
Staggered Walls Ramchandra Geekslutz forum 17 11th January 2007 10:12 PM
wood on walls lasso So much gear, so little time! 4 13th September 2004 04:49 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:53 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.