![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| New denser drywall | brokemusician3 | Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc | 23 | 16th December 2007 09:04 AM |
| gluing two layers of drywall to eachother | nemelas | Low End Theory | 50 | 27th September 2007 10:09 PM |
| Anyone used QuietRock instead of Drywall? | chetatkinsdiet | So much gear, so little time! | 20 | 17th August 2007 01:54 PM |
| SupressŪ Sound-Engineered Drywall | verbal | Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production | 1 | 7th July 2007 03:49 AM |
| Mismatching Guitar Preamp Tubes | ntimkovich | So much gear, so little time! | 9 | 11th November 2006 03:00 AM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 75
| Does impedance mismatching apply to multiple layers of drywall? Dear Friends, Will varying the thickness of subsequent layers of drywall benefit a wall system in a similar manner to mismatching the size of each pane of glass in a double glass window construction? SYSTEM #1 Floor-to-Ceiling 2x6 stud frame with 5/8" drywall (1st layer) then 1/2" drywall (2nd layer) or vice versa (any reason one way is better?) SYSTEM #2 Floor-to-Ceiling 2x6 stud frame with 5/8" drywall (1st layer) then 5/8" drywall (2nd layer) Which is the superior wall system when ISOLATION is the primary concern? I assume #2 but want to know your thoughts. Thanks! ![]()
__________________ Respect and God Bless, Dan BCNiSS |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 308
| The two choices have positives and negatives to them but the mismatched will be better over a broader range i think. Don't quote me, instead go here for all your acoustics and building questions: John Sayers Productions find the forum on that site. its gold. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 4,834
| If by "layers" you mean the two pieces of drywall are adjacent and touching and screwed together etc, I believe all that matters is the total thickness. And of course thicker is always better. This is not the same as two panes of glass, because in that case there's a space between the panes. --Ethan
__________________ www.realtraps.com The acoustic treatment experts ----------------------- Amazing Telecaster guitar video |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2004 Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 948
| There is no simple answer to a simplistic question. With studio isolation, the biggest problem is low frequency isolation. When two layers of a leaf are made of the same material and thickness, the coincidence frequency where isolation reduces is the same so the reduction at that frequency is greater. However this is at such a high frequency that the advantages of greater low frequency isolation are greater than the loss at high frequencies. With all the above taken into consideration, SYSTEM #2 is better for studio isolation. Andre |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: London
Posts: 100
| And don't forget Green Glue between the layers.... pricey, but the reports seem to be good. (what does Ethan think?). [I don't sell it. I'm buying a load for my room, so I want it to work!] |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 75
| Thanks! lakeshorephatty - true; John Sayers forum Ethan Winer - your opinion and input are always appreciated Avare - informative and to the point; your input has greatly influenced my project twice now DivingDuck - I am mid build so it is too late for green glue, good luck with your build.
__________________ Respect and God Bless, Dan BCNiSS |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |