Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio construction & acoustics > Studio building / acoustics

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Please help my square room gearaddict Studio building / acoustics 7 5th June 2008 07:53 AM
sound treating a square space deckerluke Studio building / acoustics 8 26th April 2008 06:24 AM
Cement Floors in a treated room (small, square)??? filthyrich So much gear, so little time! 15 21st May 2007 10:32 PM
Help with a square control room soypancho Low End Theory 2 3rd May 2007 06:07 PM
Room Treating Versatile255 Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 22 11th April 2007 05:26 PM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 5th July 2008, 11:02 AM   #1
jeremynothman
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 139
treating a pretty square room

Hey

I've got a bedstudio (for lack of a better term :D - my bedroom and control room in one), and unfortunately, while the room is an OK size/volume, the walls are both pretty close in dimension to one another. I've noticed quite a problem with my low end - monitoring around 100Hz is very difficult.

It's 4.65m x 4.38m x 2.61m (Walls - painted brick, ceiling - gyprock, floor - lino), and plugging those dimensions into MODECALC, i can see holes at ~800-100Hz and the same an octave lower. These affirmed my fears.

I know i've got to deal with reflections first, but i figure i should try and get the bulk of my treatment done at once, to do it correctly.

Additionally, I have a large window (2.75m x 1.55m)on one side of the room, towards one side of the wall (as in, not centred on the wall). There's also regular bedroom furniture in the room, which makes some reflection a bit strange. Would it be best to have my wardrobe behind the mix position, which some sort of diffusive devices on it?

Currently i've followed the ".38 of the long wall from the short" principle in having my mix postion placement and the speakers form about a 1.4m per side triangle.

My main fear is that if i use regular broadband absorption to try and fix my buildups at around 150Hz, will i kill the range that i really need filled out (100Hz)? I also assume that the only real chance of bringing back the 50Hz is to create a real basstrap (would be in the ceiling, i guess), aimed at my 37Hz buildup?
The most substantial buildup is in the lower end (150Hz-ish), so should i be trying to absorb alot of this and try reflecting some of the higher stuff/Maybe creating a hemispherical diffuser for behind mix position, but still using thick rockwool (4") behind it?

Thanks for the help (and sorry for the long post)!
jeremynothman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th July 2008, 08:09 PM   #2
Weasel9992
Lives for gear
 
Weasel9992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,207
Send a message via AIM to Weasel9992
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremynothman View Post
My main fear is that if i use regular broadband absorption to try and fix my buildups at around 150Hz, will i kill the range that i really need filled out (100Hz)? I also assume that the only real chance of bringing back the 50Hz is to create a real basstrap (would be in the ceiling, i guess), aimed at my 37Hz buildup?
The most substantial buildup is in the lower end (150Hz-ish), so should i be trying to absorb alot of this and try reflecting some of the higher stuff/Maybe creating a hemispherical diffuser for behind mix position, but still using thick rockwool (4") behind it?
I wouldn't worry about absorbing too much sub 50Hz...you won't. In a small, nearly square room the best course of action is to treat the heck out of it...you really can't go overboard. Get the corners, floor to ceiling, the back wall and the wall/ceiling corners...4" or 6" bass traps. What you may interpret as "loss" of low end is actually just the low end tightening up in response to treatment.

Frank
__________________
Frank Oesterheld - GIK Acoustics
www.GIKAcoustics.com

Weasel9992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2008, 08:39 AM   #3
jeremynothman
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 139
cool
So are you basically suggesting to ignore the idea of diffusion anyway in a room this size (and not worry about over-absorbing high end)?

Also, is there a "best" place to put my wardrobe?

edit: I tried do an ASCII diagram, but gearslutz doesn't like it (took out all my extra spaces)


If you can imagine, the wardrobe is currently about 2.5m behind the desk with the computer.
The window and bed are to the bottom left, where the picture cuts off.

My plan (as part of the acoustics fixing) is to move the tower under the desk, remove the vinyl carry-case and get a larger screen to push back in line with the speakers - my centre image is currently very weak compared to what i'm used to working with elsewhere
jeremynothman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2008, 12:12 PM   #4
Weasel9992
Lives for gear
 
Weasel9992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,207
Send a message via AIM to Weasel9992
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremynothman View Post
cool
So are you basically suggesting to ignore the idea of diffusion anyway in a room this size (and not worry about over-absorbing high end)?

Also, is there a "best" place to put my wardrobe?

edit: I tried do an ASCII diagram, but gearslutz doesn't like it (took out all my extra spaces)


If you can imagine, the wardrobe is currently about 2.5m behind the desk with the computer.
The window and bed are to the bottom left, where the picture cuts off.

My plan (as part of the acoustics fixing) is to move the tower under the desk, remove the vinyl carry-case and get a larger screen to push back in line with the speakers - my centre image is currently very weak compared to what i'm used to working with elsewhere
Yes, I'd ignore diffusion for now and concentrate on absorbtion.

Your center image is weak because you're off center with respect to the room. It's a little hard to tell with the picture, but it looks like you need to move over to the right. Definitely need to move that tower too, like you said.

The wardrobe can stay behind you...centered on the back wall would be the lesser of acoustic evils.

Frank
__________________
Frank Oesterheld - GIK Acoustics
www.GIKAcoustics.com

Weasel9992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2008, 06:01 AM   #5
jwl
Lives for gear
 
jwl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: southern Maine
Posts: 544
Send a message via AIM to jwl Send a message via Yahoo to jwl
To expand on what Frank said: adding good broadband absorption to a room with low end problems will raise the nulls, and lower the peaks. The bass sounds flatter, more accurate, but the lack of boominess sometimes fools people into thinking the bass went away. That's not quite accurate; the bass peaks went away.

Get some familiar recordings that have been mastered by a pro and listen in the new room to get used to the new, more accurate sound.

I agree, don't worry about diffusion for now. Step one is adequate bass trapping. The more you add, the flatter your response will get.
__________________
www.craftedrecordings.com Quality on-location audio recording in Northern New England
www.realtraps.com The acoustic treatment experts
jwl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2008, 10:03 AM   #6
jeremynothman
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 139
Thanks guys!

It's not that off centre - i moved about 10cm further to the left because it improved the bass response.. perhaps it's now boosted? I know that whenever i've pushed the monitor back it's also helped quite massively, but if i did any more it would fall off the desk!

I'd definetely move that back though once i had some absorbers back in here - it just seemed to be a poor compromise at the moment - image OR bass, and not both.
jeremynothman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2008, 07:46 AM   #7
jwl
Lives for gear
 
jwl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: southern Maine
Posts: 544
Send a message via AIM to jwl Send a message via Yahoo to jwl
It sounds like you're on the ball.... but even so, this article might help:
RealTraps - How To Set Up a Room
__________________
www.craftedrecordings.com Quality on-location audio recording in Northern New England
www.realtraps.com The acoustic treatment experts
jwl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th July 2008, 02:22 PM   #8
Weasel9992
Lives for gear
 
Weasel9992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,207
Send a message via AIM to Weasel9992
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremynothman View Post
I'd definetely move that back though once i had some absorbers back in here - it just seemed to be a poor compromise at the moment - image OR bass, and not both.
Unfortunately that tends to be the case for rooms that aren't built to suit this purpose. The only option is to move things around and treat the space to maximize it for recording/mixing, but even the best case scenario will involve some compromise...hopefully as little as possible.

Frank
__________________
Frank Oesterheld - GIK Acoustics
www.GIKAcoustics.com


Last edited by Weasel9992; 9th July 2008 at 02:22 PM.. Reason: Typo
Weasel9992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0