Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio construction & acoustics > Studio building / acoustics

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Desk Design Opinions xj32 Studio building / acoustics 7 5th June 2008 10:16 PM
Studio Design tonymite Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 0 30th March 2008 05:56 PM
Opinions on this trap design. Jalabodu Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 9 4th January 2008 05:24 PM
design (planning) new 55 m2 studio. help with design. ddanyboy So much gear, so little time! 11 12th January 2007 03:25 PM
Frank Manzella Studio design opinions TML High end 4 3rd October 2005 07:24 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 18th June 2008, 10:26 PM   #1
2fly
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sheffield UK
Posts: 3
Studio design - opinions

I have just taken on some premises in which I want to build a second studio. It's essentially an oblong shape 10.8 x 7.5 x 3.2m high
with a small brick built room on one side. I've done a few designs which I feel I'd be happy to implement but before I do I'd like some of your expert opinions as to which design you feel would offer

1) a versatile recording space,
2) the best shaped control room
3) the best overall workspace

Below is a link to the designs (which are approximate in size and structure but should give you an idea)

Untitled Document

I really appreciate your time and advice in advance!!

Alan


2fly studios
2fly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008, 12:18 AM   #2
2fly
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sheffield UK
Posts: 3
Oops! apologies I've just realised I didn't even say hello! well that's copy/paste for you or in my case pilot error!

This site is great. I've visited as a guest many times but never posted before. I've just been reading through some of the great advice re bass traps etc. a fantastic source of knowledge.

I really would value any opinions on these designs as it's important to me that I create an inspirational space for folk to work in.

Cheers
2fly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008, 03:30 PM   #3
Weasel9992
Lives for gear
 
Weasel9992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,207
Send a message via AIM to Weasel9992
No brainer: design 4. The control room is symmetrical...looks like you're using the live room space almost as efficiently as design 1. Probably better acoustically. Go check out some of John Sayers' designs...he works with spaces like this all the time.

Frank
__________________
Frank Oesterheld - GIK Acoustics
www.GIKAcoustics.com

Weasel9992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008, 04:42 PM   #4
Ethan Winer
Lives for gear
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 4,834
Lightbulb

Alan,

I'd go for either 1 or 2, keeping in mind the importance of symmetry as Frank pointed out. The problem I see with 3 and 4 is they create narrow strips that are less useful for recording areas. Even though 1 is not fully symmetrical, the lack of symmetry is in the rear of the room where it matters less. And in 1 the control room is large and the live room is not too small.

--Ethan
__________________
www.realtraps.com
The acoustic treatment experts
-----------------------
Amazing Telecaster guitar video
Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th June 2008, 05:15 PM   #5
Weasel9992
Lives for gear
 
Weasel9992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 1,207
Send a message via AIM to Weasel9992
Hmmmm...interesting. I guess I was thinking of that long, narrow space as a reception area, lounge or airlock. The other designs had control rooms that were either firing into a corner or showed assymetry in the front of the rooms.

Frank
__________________
Frank Oesterheld - GIK Acoustics
www.GIKAcoustics.com

Weasel9992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd June 2008, 01:25 PM   #6
Anderson
Registered User
 
Anderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Brussels, Belgium.
Posts: 472
Within the proposed basic designs, number 4 is the best. All the others have big flaws. But it can be greatly optimized in terms of use of space, and room shapes (geos are THE most important part of a design. You solve most of the problems with a good/ engineered geometry). And those windows in the back of the CR spot... You won't be able to keep them I'm afraid. Or be ready to make big compromises both technical and financial.

Best of luck!
Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0