![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | Preferable Frequency Response!! Hi All, Here are three pics from my room. A is the mic postioned at 38% and monitors placed in an equilateral triangle. B is just the mic placed a foot back and C both the mic and monitors placed a foot back. I was wondering what your thoughts were on the best position based on these pics. Thanks !! |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Join Date: May 2007 Location: London, UK
Posts: 104
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | Funnily enough, I have about ten traps and a cloud. The dimensions are 21 feet long by 9 feet wide by 8 feet high. And I have a calibrated mike. Is it that bad ?? i always thought that if you got your reponse between +- 6db you were doing ok? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Join Date: May 2007 Location: London, UK
Posts: 104
| It's REALLY bad below 100Hz. Otherwise it's OK. I bet you are not hearing a lot of bass with this setup... |
| | |
| | #5 |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Join Date: May 2007 Location: London, UK
Posts: 104
| And C is the best of the bunch, I believe. If you can get rid of that nasty 60Hz dip, then you will actually have a pretty decent curve, although I am not sure about the peak at 10KHz (may be able to tame that with EQ although that's generally not a very popular idea; perhaps if your monitors have a treble control, you can decrease the highs a bit). |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | thanks for your input !!! |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | That 60hz dip seems to be prominent in all three pics. Dont know what to do to get rid of it!! |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,003
| I would have to go with C also. Do you have panels between you and the monitors on the right and left wall in the early reflection points? Trust me I have seen rooms much worse then this. Are you facing the long wall or the short wall? You should be facing the short wall. Glenn
__________________ Glenn Kuras GIK Acoustics USA GIK Acoustics Europe 770 986 2789 (USA) +44 (0) 20 7558 8976 (UK) See the NEW Soffit Bass Trap |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2004 Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 3,483
| To answer your question first, A and B are you moving your head. So the question becomes B and C. Between those two C is better. There is severe comb filtering going on. Do you have the first reflection points covered? What is the location of the console relative to the mic and monitors? The 60 Hertz dip could be related to height or width of the room. Is there a dimension around 9' that the mic is centred on? Andre |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | Hi glen yes I am facing the short wall. Andre the width of the wall is 9ft which I guess is what is causing th 60hz dip. Also the stands tend to ring quite badly when doing a sweep. Once I find the correct position I am going to fill them with sand to dampen this effect. |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Sorbothane is very good...and yes heavy stands are very important. What percentage of walls and ceiling are treated? 8 foot and 9 foot are also very close to each other, something you can't correct, so more bass trapping... Also make sure your dimensions between speakers and boundaries are not the same, at least a foot different. | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | Hi Mike, Yeah the speakers are decoupled. I Know what you mean when you say that two of the dimensions are quite similar. I guess more trapping it is. Will more trapping reduce that 60hz null ?? I find that moving the speakers and mike around just shifts the problem to a different node. |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Check out Bob Hodus site. http://www.bobhodas.com/pub4.html You will find that very interesting... | |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2004 Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 3,483
| Quote:
These modes are what make a room sound like, well, a room.You forgot to respond to two of my questions: Do you have the first reflection points covered? and What is the location of the console relative to the mic and monitors? Andre | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,003
| Quote:
Yes more bass trapping will always help but look at the other things people are telling you first and go from there. Glenn | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | Mike, thanks for that link!! Will read it now. Andre thanks for your time too and Glen, 1) Yes got the first reflection points covered. 2) Sitting in the mix position and placing a mirror on the table I can just about see the tweeters of the Adam. Is this what you mean? To remedy this I am thinking of sawing the table in half which would eliminate this problem. I can send you a picture of my test setup as is if you want ? Thanks again chaps !! |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear | One more thing that can make a difference, is the console or stand its on, is it open on the bottom? This allows the low end to move more freely in the room. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | Hi Mike, Speakers are on a stand behind the console. For now the bottom of the console is open as I have to move it about to get the best spot. Once I have which I think I have now, I will saw the desk in half (so that tweeter reflection is eliminated), fill the speaker stands with sand and the racks up underneath with equipment. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | here is the test setup |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 12,050
| I see plenty of room for more traps in the wall-ceiling corners, and even on the floor in front of your feet. That's a great place for bass traps because there's nothing to install. Just lay them sideways on the floor, tipped back against the front wall. Ten more traps in that room will make a big improvement. --Ethan
__________________ Ethan's audio book is coming! |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | Hi Ethan. Did not even think about that. Cheers !!!! |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | Quote:
Hi Srs. If I could chop the desk in half, would that be better or just placing 2" of rock wool on the desk wrapped in material across the first reflection zone do the same thing for reflections from the tweeter ? | |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear | Can't really tell what's on the ceiling... How far back are your monitors from the desk top? What is the difference between floor to wooker and ceiling to woofer? |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Southern California
Posts: 935
| Well, I am not an acoustician by any means, but I have done lots of research and experimentation over the years in my studios. Just wanted to get that out there. In my opinion and experience, the first reflection points coming from the monitors is relatively focused on a small portion of either the desk/console, or the floor (if the desk is not there). In the picture I see of your room, I would not try and eliminate the desk by going through the process of sawing it in half, but just by taming those first reflections off of it when in use. I would think that two inches of rock-wool might be a bit extreme for this purpose. I have tried various objects with much success to do the same thing. Such as a small hand towel on both points of each monitor, folded up on the desk, or a (gasp... piece of foam) there to serve the same purpose. You just really need to kill the upper mid and high freqs bouncing off the desk. Anything but that hard flat surface will affect this reflection obviously. I just think that sawing your desk (precious real estate) away may be a bit extreme. Although in mastering facilities and critical listening rooms, there is often nothing but the equipment sitting on the floor (or in a minimal rack) and the sweet spot throne. My 2 cents on the subject. Hope it helps grow some further thoughts... |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,003
| |
| | |
| | #27 | |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | Quote:
. Have to measure woofer to floor and ceiling but will do. Cheers | |
| | |
| | #28 | |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22
Thread Starter | Quote:
Thanks for your thoughts. I dont mind sawing the desk as it eliminates the reflections as well. I like your thoughts on having as little in the way as possible !! | |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2004 Location: Hamilton, On Canada
Posts: 3,483
| Great stuff! The picture helps a lot. First Reflections Looking at the picture, you definitively have the same side reflection points (like left speaker left wall to listening position) covered. However it almost looks like you do not have the opposite side (left speaker right wall to listening position) covered. Please clarify this. The Desk Before you cut up the desk, take it out of its position and repeat the measurements. This will show much negative reflections are coming from it. Mic Height Just to confirm, you tested with the mic at 42"? Bass Trapping From looking at your test results, bass trapping is not a high priority at this time. We wrote already about the null at the low end. The rest of the frequency range is the highest priority. Keep the questions coming. The more you know, the better your space will be. Andre |
| | |
| | #30 | |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 11,003
| Quote:
![]() Glenn | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Does frequency response ABOVE 20 kHz really matter? | chessparov | So much gear, so little time! | 50 | 25th September 2008 04:44 AM |
| What's the frequency response of your ears? | bionic brown | So much gear, so little time! | 14 | 8th December 2007 07:16 AM |
| Analog Frequency Response | Lawrence | So much gear, so little time! | 27 | 26th February 2007 04:38 PM |
| Frequency Response | jcool | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 7th February 2007 06:39 PM |
| Help!: U87ai actual frequency response? | brutze | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 2nd October 2006 04:40 PM |
| |