![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Gear addict Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 364
Thread Starter | high density rockwool it seems that the hgih density 30mm thick rockwool from a uk supplier works out at about 180kg/m3 - is a density that high to be avoided for traps? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: St. Louis(Wildwood), MO
Posts: 756
| Not at all. However, depending on how thick you're going to make the absorbers, it may not be necessary to have that density. For simple reflection absorbers, it's certainly not nessary - something half that dense will work just fine. Bryan
__________________ I am serious, and don't call me Shirley Bryan Pape Lead Acoustical Designer GIK Acoustics |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear addict Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 364
Thread Starter | thanks, so it's going to absorb some bass, but probably reflect the highs? I was thinking I could maybe attach some acoustic foam to the fronts for a more broadband effect - I am tracking/mixing in the same room.. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 2,900
| It won't reflect highs, so there is no need or additional absorber. |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
that high density stuff is much more expensive than the standard slabs they do. Im unsure as to whether the standard is dense enough though? | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 364
Thread Starter | yes, is wickes - according to some the 50mm thick cheaper stuff is better for general purpose treatment - I have 5 traps of the 30mm and it doesn't seem to do much for the higher frequencies |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: St. Louis(Wildwood), MO
Posts: 756
| It depends on how you use it. For multiple layers for bass absorbtion, the higher density will be fine. For reflection panels on the side walls with somewhat shallow angles of incidence, the less dense material is preferable. Bryan |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 1
| Wickes Heavy Density Insulation hello, I have been searching threads re diy bass traps and have found some really helpful posts. I have found this product in Wickes (UK) which is 200kg/m3 density. from reading post I understand that this might be too dense for bass traps, is that right?. what I like about this material is that it is relatively rigid (would stand up on its side). it comes in 30mm sheets (pack of 5). my idea is to wrap in plastic (to stop fibres leaking out), then cloth (decorative) then velcro to room corners. I want to avoid making frames and really make it as easy, quick and cheap as possible.If this is too high density would it be better to just use 1 or 2 sheets instead of the 3 together I was planning (ie 90m total). one other question is whether there is a more fire-safe way of sealing them without using spray glue etc?, maybe fireproofed fabric wrapped round with parcel tape? any thoughts are well appreciated. many thanks Joe. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Stockholm
Posts: 2,636
| |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| where to get rockwool? | cassiopamusic | Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc | 4 | 3rd January 2008 04:15 PM |
| Update for Airwindows Density and Drive (free plugs) | chrisj | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 20th November 2007 04:13 AM |
| Is there any use at all for low density rockwool | orange | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 5th July 2007 11:53 PM |
| Acceptable Density of Rockwool for Basstraps? | teknosmoker | Low End Theory | 4 | 2nd June 2007 02:37 AM |
| New battery offers unsurpassed recharge performance and high energy density | BevvyB | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 4th April 2005 11:56 PM |
| |