Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Studio building / acoustics


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th January 2008   #1
Gear addict
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 364

Thread Starter
high density rockwool

it seems that the hgih density 30mm thick rockwool from a uk supplier works out at about 180kg/m3 - is a density that high to be avoided for traps?
loaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2008   #2
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St. Louis(Wildwood), MO
Posts: 756

Not at all. However, depending on how thick you're going to make the absorbers, it may not be necessary to have that density.

For simple reflection absorbers, it's certainly not nessary - something half that dense will work just fine.

Bryan
__________________
I am serious, and don't call me Shirley

Bryan Pape
Lead Acoustical Designer
GIK Acoustics
bpape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2008   #3
Gear addict
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 364

Thread Starter
thanks, so it's going to absorb some bass, but probably reflect the highs? I was thinking I could maybe attach some acoustic foam to the fronts for a more broadband effect - I am tracking/mixing in the same room..
loaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2008   #4
Lives for gear
 
matucha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Posts: 2,900

It won't reflect highs, so there is no need or additional absorber.
matucha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2008   #5
Lives for gear
 
streetbeats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Wokingham UK
Posts: 672

Send a message via AIM to streetbeats Send a message via Skype™ to streetbeats
Quote:
Originally Posted by loaf View Post
it seems that the hgih density 30mm thick rockwool from a uk supplier works out at about 180kg/m3 - is a density that high to be avoided for traps?
Is this the stuff from wickes?

that high density stuff is much more expensive than the standard slabs they do.

Im unsure as to whether the standard is dense enough though?
__________________
Subvert Central Mastering
http://www.scmastering.com
streetbeats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2008   #6
Gear addict
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 364

Thread Starter
yes, is wickes - according to some the 50mm thick cheaper stuff is better for general purpose treatment - I have 5 traps of the 30mm and it doesn't seem to do much for the higher frequencies
loaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th January 2008   #7
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St. Louis(Wildwood), MO
Posts: 756

It depends on how you use it. For multiple layers for bass absorbtion, the higher density will be fine.

For reflection panels on the side walls with somewhat shallow angles of incidence, the less dense material is preferable.

Bryan
bpape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 Days Ago   #8
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Brighton UK
Posts: 1

Wickes Heavy Density Insulation

hello, I have been searching threads re diy bass traps and have found some really helpful posts. I have found this product in Wickes (UK) which is 200kg/m3 density. from reading post I understand that this might be too dense for bass traps, is that right?. what I like about this material is that it is relatively rigid (would stand up on its side). it comes in 30mm sheets (pack of 5). my idea is to wrap in plastic (to stop fibres leaking out), then cloth (decorative) then velcro to room corners. I want to avoid making frames and really make it as easy, quick and cheap as possible.If this is too high density would it be better to just use 1 or 2 sheets instead of the 3 together I was planning (ie 90m total).
one other question is whether there is a more fire-safe way of sealing them without using spray glue etc?, maybe fireproofed fabric wrapped round with parcel tape?

any thoughts are well appreciated.
many thanks
Joe.
PepeLuis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 Days Ago   #9
Lives for gear
 
Jens Eklund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 2,636

Low kg/m3 is worthless.

first reflection panels density and thickness

this type of rock wool could work?

Jens Eklund is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
where to get rockwool? cassiopamusic Bass traps, acoustic panels, foam etc 4 3rd January 2008 04:15 PM
Update for Airwindows Density and Drive (free plugs) chrisj So much gear, so little time! 1 20th November 2007 04:13 AM
Is there any use at all for low density rockwool orange So much gear, so little time! 6 5th July 2007 11:53 PM
Acceptable Density of Rockwool for Basstraps? teknosmoker Low End Theory 4 2nd June 2007 02:37 AM
New battery offers unsurpassed recharge performance and high energy density BevvyB So much gear, so little time! 4 4th April 2005 11:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:06 PM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.