EEK!! HELP!! Song mysteriously changes key!?! - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!


EEK!! HELP!! Song mysteriously changes key!?!

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 31st October 2006   #1
Lives for gear
 
bgrotto's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Slum-a-ville, Mass
Posts: 6,312

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to bgrotto
EEK!! HELP!! Song mysteriously changes key!?!

Last night I was doing a freelance gig at a studio I hadn't ever worked in. We tracked everything into Pro Tools at 44.1/24-bit, but ran short on time, so we couldn't do rough mixes at the studio. I told my client I'd do a coupla quick bounces for him when I got home.

I bounced the files using Pro Tools' MP3 convertor, at 44.1, and emailed them off. Today, the client called me and told me that the songs were a half-step higher than what we recorded them at!! However, the tempos are exactly the same (they played both tunes to Pro Tools' Click, and I have since then referenced the rough mixes and PT sessions to my own hardware metronome), and there's no apparent loss in sound quality that I would typically associate with vari-speed/pitch shift/etc.

SO WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED!?!? Does anyone have an explanation for this?? I've done countless sessions bouncing between studios, PT rigs, etc, and NOTHING like this has ever happened.

What gives??
bgrotto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2006   #2
Lives for gear
 
John Suitcase's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,169

I'd say that if the tempo still matches (check the MP3 against your rough mixes against the raw tracks), then it's not clock/sample rate related.

Having said that, I'd be surprised if that's the case. It sounds like a sample rate issue to me.

If all three sound ok to you, that is they all match up, then I'd be inclined to say that the problem may be with the client's machine, or somewhere in between.
John Suitcase is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2006   #3
Gear Guru
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,234



What happened, probably, is that the song was recorded a half-step higher than what your client thought.

Is this guitar, wind, vocal, string.... or keyboard music?



-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2006   #4
Lives for gear
 
bgrotto's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Slum-a-ville, Mass
Posts: 6,312

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to bgrotto
Quote:
Originally Posted by tINY View Post


What happened, probably, is that the song was recorded a half-step higher than what your client thought.

Is this guitar, wind, vocal, string.... or keyboard music?
It's drums, percussion, bass, guitar, organ, and steel drums.

The organ and pans cannot really be tuned...that's why we are all quite certain the tune was recorded in the right key.

I've been thinking: maybe PT's clock was at 48k, even though the PT session was at 44.1. That'd probably account for the 1/2 step change. I dunno. It's very frustrating.
bgrotto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2006   #5
MonsterIsland.com
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 4,233

That's similar to what I was going to suggest. I think there was probably an external clock becuase I don't think the mismatch can happen internally.
__________________
http://www.monsterisland.com
Mike Caffrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2006   #6
Lives for gear
 
bgrotto's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Slum-a-ville, Mass
Posts: 6,312

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to bgrotto
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Caffrey View Post
That's similar to what I was going to suggest. I think there was probably an external clock becuase I don't think the mismatch can happen internally.
Yeah, the confusion for me was that the clients told me the key was shifted UP a half-step...in fact, it was shifted DOWN a half-step.

I contacted the studio, and they do indeed have an external clock, and their standard practice is to run all sessions at 48k. So...mystery solved.

Now, I was wondering if there's a way to convert my 44.1 session so that I don't have to make sure I'm clocking at 48k for the rest of this project!!

Any suggestions?
bgrotto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2006   #7
Gear Guru
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,234



Sample rate converters.



-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2006   #8
Lives for gear
 
e-cue's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 4,069

Quote:
Originally Posted by bgrotto View Post
I contacted the studio, and they do indeed have an external clock, and their standard practice is to run all sessions at 48k. So...mystery solved.
Not exactly... How did it change pitch, but the tempo remained exactly the same?
e-cue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2006   #9
Lives for gear
 
bgrotto's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Slum-a-ville, Mass
Posts: 6,312

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to bgrotto
Quote:
Originally Posted by tINY View Post


Sample rate converters.

Heh. Thank you for your insiteful answer, but I think you're missing the point. I wanna change the SR for the Pro Tools session; the audio is fine and doesn't need to be resampled.

I was asking if there's a way to trick PT into letting me drop the audio into a new 48k session without it changing the existing samping rate (which is correct, just in a mis-clocked PT session...get it?).

I want to avoid any resampling of the audio so as to best preserve its integrity.
bgrotto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st October 2006   #10
Lives for gear
 
bgrotto's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Slum-a-ville, Mass
Posts: 6,312

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to bgrotto
Quote:
Originally Posted by bgrotto View Post
I was asking if there's a way to trick PT into letting me drop the audio into a new 48k session without it changing the existing samping rate (which is correct, just in a mis-clocked PT session...get it?).

I want to avoid any resampling of the audio so as to best preserve its integrity.
Eureka! I got it. For those curious:

1) create a new 48k session
2) Import Session Data from old 44.1 session WITHOUT using SRC
3) Booyah.

That was WAAAAY easier than I thought it'd be. If I wanted to keep the session at 44.1, I could do this:

1) create new 44.1 session.
2) Importa Sessioin Data from old session WITH SRC
3) Booyah.

That, of course, would degrade the audio some. But it'd be at 44.1. Hooray.
bgrotto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2006   #11
MonsterIsland.com
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 4,233

Why not stay at 48 until the end?
Mike Caffrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2006   #12
Moderator
 
toolskid's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: london
Posts: 2,787

Send a message via Skype™ to toolskid
Quote:
Originally Posted by e-cue View Post
Not exactly... How did it change pitch, but the tempo remained exactly the same?
I'm curious about that too!
toolskid is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2006   #13
Gear Guru
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,234


I'm guessing that the tempo change was just less obvious than the pitch change. Though you'd think that 10% would be noticable....




-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2006   #14
Moderator
 
toolskid's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Location: london
Posts: 2,787

Send a message via Skype™ to toolskid
Quote:
Originally Posted by tINY View Post

I'm guessing that the tempo change was just less obvious than the pitch change. Though you'd think that 10% would be noticable....

-tINY


I'm pretty sure he said that one of them lined up the two differently pitched tracks together in tools!!!!!

still room for operator error tho I suppose!
__________________
Emre Ramazanoglu
http://www.emremusic.com

the wise man can pick up a grain of sand and envision the whole universe. The fool, however,
will just lie down on some seaweed and roll around until he's completely draped in it. Then he'll
stand up and go "Hey, I'm vine man"
toolskid is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1st November 2006   #15
Lives for gear
 
bgrotto's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Location: Slum-a-ville, Mass
Posts: 6,312

Thread Starter
Send a message via AIM to bgrotto
Quote:
Originally Posted by toolskid View Post
I'm pretty sure he said that one of them lined up the two differently pitched tracks together in tools!!!!!

still room for operator error tho I suppose!
So here's what happened, guys:

The studio's clock (which, embarassingly, I was unaware of) was set to 48k. I created a 44.1 PT session, and recorded the tunes as normal. When I got home, I bounced rough mixes, clocked at 44.1, and emailed them to the client. He told me the mixes were pitch a half-step HIGHER; this is where the confusion set in. In fact, they were a half-step LOWER, which if he'd have told me, I'd have known that the PT system at the studio must've been clocked at 48. I started thinking that maybe there was indeed a clocking error on my part, so I simply set my clock to 48, created a 44.1 PT session, and played a single note on a guitar into the session. Then, I reset my clock to 44.1, and the pitch was indeed lower by just UNDER a half-step.

Sooooo (whew), here's what happened with the tempo: the original 44.1 session had the click set at 66bpm. While we were at the studio (with the clock running at 48), what the screen said was not in fact what the click was playing, as the session was misclocked. That's why when I got to my house, and clocked the session at 44.1, the tempos lined up. Brain-teaser, right? I feel like I'm doing an SAT math problem.

Regardless, everything's cool. I didn't have to do any SRC, and the songs play back at the right tempo and in the right key. Plus now the snare cuts through more clearly!!
bgrotto is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
pitching samples up messes with the key (no exact key) crew14 Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 13 27th April 2006 02:01 AM
Guitar-based song needs key change / tuning guitars down 1 full step mcballs So much gear, so little time! 9 19th December 2005 10:18 PM
e-cue "DW Drum kits tuned to the key of the song we are working on" Jules So much gear, so little time! 109 6th November 2005 12:52 AM
Auto tune without knowing key of song? beatzz Music computers 76 12th August 2005 09:10 AM
Key Changers Randy Moore Music computers 6 11th February 2005 05:30 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:53 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.