Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So much gear, so little time!

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
more mic pre questions knorr Low End Theory 9 7th June 2006 05:11 PM
brass mic recommendation tool Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 2 3rd May 2006 11:49 PM
Mic Questions scwarren1015 Low End Theory 15 1st May 2006 07:27 PM
Mic questions PimpboyLee High end 5 17th October 2004 11:32 PM
Mic questions................... PRS1JAZZ So much gear, so little time! 2 20th July 2003 06:20 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 16th October 2006, 09:35 AM   #1
drBill
Lives for gear
 
drBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 3,746
Brass Mic Questions....

I haven't been recording brass for awhile at my personal studio, done most of that at larger rooms, but with my new room up and going (16X24X12 ceilings) I want to record a new project here. It will have a lot of brass fanfare stuff and is kind of "Olympic-esque" like for lack of a better term. 2Tpt, 2Bones, 1Tuba, 2FHn

I'll probably record the Tpt/Tbn's in one session and the Tuba/FHns in another. The budget/timetable will be so tight that there will not be a lot of time for experimentation on mics.

I've got a lot of new mics, but would love to hear what you would choose and/if I need to get some new mics - either beg, borrow, steal or buy. (I'm thinking it's time for some ribbons!)

I've got access to:

U87, (2)KM84, (2) Geffel UM70, UM71, M70, (2) AKG414B-ULS, (2) C451EB, (3) Sennheiser 421, (2) MXLV69ME, GT AM62, (2) AM40's and the usual smattering of dynamics & misc mics.

I hate the fizzy thin sound of a hypey condenser. I want it big, beefy and fat like a wall of guitars. I've used the 87 & 414's on Tpt and hated it. The 87 is cool on bones though. In other studios I usually end up with some classic tube mics, but that's just not going to happen this time. Any suggestions? Have any of you been using any of the less expensive ribbons on Brass as of late? I'll be operating on a pretty tight budget on this one and although I'd like nothing better than going out and exercising my gear-sluttieness and spending ten grand on mics, that's just not gonna happen this time.

So....any suggestions?

Thanks! Bill

PS - for pre's I've got - API 512's, A couple of shadow hills gama's and a boatload of pres (48 - as if I needed even half of them) in my D&R Orion.
drBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 11:13 AM   #2
DarkSky
Lives for gear
 
DarkSky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 892
Yes, ribbons - esp the AEA R84 if you can b/b/s one. Beyerdynamic M130 does great spot and close work and is a bit cheaper.

Ribbons aside, the U67 is a better choice than U87 on brass IMO. Try it if you can.

I've heard some reports that the MXL V669 does well with horns. We have one here, but it's never won a shoot-out against the R84s for this role.

MD421s work well also. If you use them on trumpets they'll need some eq to soften the edges but contralto horns will shine.
DarkSky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 11:14 AM   #3
Han
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 826
Seems like you need a good ribbon mic.
Han is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 06:55 PM   #4
drBill
Lives for gear
 
drBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 3,746
Quote:
Originally Posted by Han View Post
Seems like you need a good ribbon mic.
Yeah - a bunch of them!

I've used 67's & 47's extensively in the big studios, but can't afford that here. I've used the V69ME on solo tpt and it worked out well. Not sure about a section though. I may try it or try finding a pair of 84's.

Any more ideas?

Thx.

bp
drBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 07:12 PM   #5
BLUElightCory
Lives for gear
 
BLUElightCory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 717
My first recording teacher was the head of the jazz band and the big band at our school; he always got great results using primarily 421s on brass instruments.

I tend to work with indie/rock/metal artists more than anything else, but on the few occasions I've recorded brass and woodwind instruments I've always ended up favoring the Royer R121.

For what it's worth - Cory Spotts
BLUElightCory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 07:21 PM   #6
mbrebes
Gear addict
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northridge, CA
Posts: 346
Don't know if you're recording each group (like the two trumpets) individually or with one mic.
With what you've got, I would probably try either the 414's or the 421's on the trumpets.
Trombones would probably work with 87, 414, or 421.
Tuba could be done with a 421.
French horns can be troublesome, since their tone can get pretty murky at times. Plus it depends on the quality of the players and their horns. I would probably start with a 414 and then go to a brighter mic, like the 87, KM84, or 451, if you need to lighten up the tone.
mbrebes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 07:27 PM   #7
NathanEldred
Lives for gear
 
NathanEldred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: West Coast Central Florida
Posts: 5,451
Send a message via AIM to NathanEldred
If you can't afford an AEA or Royer or higher end Crowley and Tripp (all of which sound excellent in various apps), you may want to consider the Peluso R-14 ribbon, which is a bit less expensive and still excellent bang for the buck IMHO. If the Peluso is a bit too thick in the low end for your tastes, the backside of the Crowley and Tripp Naked Eye ribbon will be a good choice (the back of the figure 8 pattern is less dark than the front) , and is still economical.

__________________
Nathan Eldred
Atlas Pro Audio- Boutique Gear, Consultation, Sales, & Distibution
Home of the Atlas Juggernaut Preamp & 500 Series Revolver Rack

USA Distributor for Buzz Audio

Exclusive Worldwide Distributor for
Atlas Pro Audio Gear, Old School Audio (OSA), and Burgin McDaniel Design



Atlas Recording Studios, Inc.
Recording/Mixing/Mastering Services
NathanEldred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 08:42 PM   #8
klaukholm
Lives for gear
 
klaukholm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 1,245
U87 for tuba and trombones, TLM 170 can also work
TLM170 for horns (1 in front and one behind with switched phase)
RCA44, coles 4038, m269, U67 for trumpet. In a bind TLM170.

I like keeping a respectful distance to the bells of the trumpets.
When recording them separately, I would start with the lows to give the highs a tuning reference, the other way around is not optimal for pitch reasons.
__________________
Kjetil Laukholm
European Classical Records
CK Recording
Malmö Symphony Orchestra
klaukholm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 11:22 PM   #9
PlugHead
Lives for gear
 
PlugHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: steeltown
Posts: 1,712
Send a message via MSN to PlugHead Send a message via Skype™ to PlugHead
Quote:
Originally Posted by klaukholm View Post
U87 for tuba and trombones, TLM 170 can also work
TLM170 for horns (1 in front and one behind with switched phase)
RCA44, coles 4038, m269, U67 for trumpet. In a bind TLM170.

I like keeping a respectful distance to the bells of the trumpets.
When recording them separately, I would start with the lows to give the highs a tuning reference, the other way around is not optimal for pitch reasons.
Some good ideas here, but I don't like U87's on tuba/bone: just a bit too bright and their inherent bite often accentuates the 'honky' mids on trombone - TLM 170 is more neutral without the fizz.

As a brass player, I prefer ribbons (4038/R-121/R-122/R-84/SF-1 etc.), but there are a lot of mics that can do the job. AEA's R-88 as an ensemble mic most likely would be stunning - a brass ensemble's "wet dream"

If you have an EV RE-20, or Senn 441's kicking around, I'd consider trying them on both tuba and trombone (even trumpet!). Good dynamics are often overlooked, and have better rejection than most condensers (esp. if they're all in the same room!)

Ditto on not mic'ing the trumpet(s) too close: can be spitty sounding close to the bell. Listen first from a few feet back - if the room is very "live" you might need to get in closer, but a safe distance back sounds more natural.

Best with it,
__________________
Jay
PlugHead Productions
PlugHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2006, 12:26 AM   #10
T.RayBullard
Lives for gear
 
T.RayBullard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Columbus County, North Carolina
Posts: 2,431
Send a message via AIM to T.RayBullard Send a message via MSN to T.RayBullard Send a message via Yahoo to T.RayBullard
Ribbons preferred here too. Dont like to use my u87s at all for this.

coles 4040 and Beyer m130/m160 are my tools for this task..the MXL V6 is a real sleeper too..sounds remarkable on lower brass.
__________________
I think it is wrong to make everything equidistant
from the listener with too many mics. The pasting-on effects end up like bad Photoshop work on graphics & photos - too unbelievable.
-Tony Faulkner

http://www.last.fm/user/TeddyBullard/
T.RayBullard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2006, 01:48 AM   #11
classicalrecord
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Burbank
Posts: 192
my vote is for ribbons as well, especially if you're talking about micing everyone up individually. as a trombone player, there's just something about the ribbon mic sound that evokes a certain nostalgia. 441's are great as well, and i would often choose a high quality dynamic over a condensor-- but those gefell um70, m71, etc's also can work well for horns-- i have a couple m71s' and they're great for being a little more honest than my beyer m130.
classicalrecord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2006, 05:08 AM   #12
Steffmo
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: West Haven, CT
Posts: 1,125
I have to agree that often ribbons and good dynamics work better than cndensors, even good ones.

I've worked with the Blues Brothers section a lot. First time I wasn't really equipped or prepared. I put a 414 in front of Alan rubin on trumpet.....which he immediately dismissed a "Cheap Japanese Shit". I told him it wasn't Japanese, but he reiterated it was "Cheap japanese shit". We settled on a 441.

Next time in I had 2 Coles 4038. He loved the Coles through a Focusrite 115. He liked it as much as his personal U47.

On Sax Lou Marini was very partial to a c12VR. The other Coles went to Birch Johnson on Bone...though he also likes RE20.

One session we had the great Ronnie Cuber on Bari. C12 worked on that.

I really think this section is unbeatable. Certainly in the top 3.
Steffmo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2006, 06:37 AM   #13
klaukholm
Lives for gear
 
klaukholm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 1,245
The lineup above is of course only support/spot. The main rig will typically be
5 M150's on orchestral brass.
__________________
Kjetil Laukholm
European Classical Records
CK Recording
Malmö Symphony Orchestra
klaukholm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2006, 09:00 AM   #14
drBill
Lives for gear
 
drBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 3,746
Great ideas guys. Thanks for the help. Is the R88 basically two R84's? Keep the ideas coming! bp
drBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2006, 09:28 AM   #15
TanTan
Lives for gear
 
TanTan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Israel
Posts: 712
the Beyer M160 is magic for brass, for dynamics i'd choose a Senheiser 441 or 421,
condensers works for me only for the brass instruments who plays on the low octave and when blending them with the high octaves brasses who recorded with ribbons it seats great in the mix , and i'd go for tube condensers for the lows , i had some good results with a Lawson L47 , a CMV562 or a U67, i'm not a fan of the U87 for brasses
TanTan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2006, 11:53 AM   #16
Han
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 826
Since I've got Beyer M260's (3) I've never used anything else for brass and even winds.

A while ago I've recorded a klezmer band and the winds were recorded with both a Beyer 260 and a Neumann M149.

The player's choice was the 260. M260's have a rolloff on the low end, but who needs low end for tpets tbones or clarinets?

Besides that, the Beyer ribbons are among the brighter sounding ribbons and 260's are the cheapest of them, but great mics.

I always use two mics on brass and winds, the MD441 is great as well and very rejective, but still a nice OAR.

And if you go for an MD421 on brass, use the MK1.
Han is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2006, 02:27 PM   #17
PlugHead
Lives for gear
 
PlugHead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: steeltown
Posts: 1,712
Send a message via MSN to PlugHead Send a message via Skype™ to PlugHead
Quote:
Originally Posted by drBill View Post
Great ideas guys. Thanks for the help. Is the R88 basically two R84's? Keep the ideas coming! bp
According to Wes Dooley, the R-88 isn't exactly the same as the R-84: it should be a bit brighter (has less felt/cloth lining the interior) and can take blistering SPL (165 dB!!).

FWIW, I love mine: wouldn't trade it for anything, and has it's own distinctive flavour. The nicest thing is it can produce fantastic bass response while placed quite a distance from the source. The stereo image is beautiful.

Worth trying out if possible!
__________________
Jay
PlugHead Productions
PlugHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2006, 02:58 PM   #18
Neveboy
Gear nut
 
Neveboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 109
Send a message via MSN to Neveboy Send a message via Skype™ to Neveboy
Just finished a session recording brass using Royer 122s.

Yuummy !

So like the rest.....Ribbons
Neveboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2006, 03:18 PM   #19
Jamz
Lives for gear
 
Jamz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bucks County/Philly, PA
Posts: 2,151
Quote:
Originally Posted by drBill View Post
Great ideas guys. Thanks for the help. Is the R88 basically two R84's? Keep the ideas coming! bp
To me the R88 seems to have a flatter response than the R84 or the R92. Not as much bottom as the R84. "Fuller" than the R92. Among other applications I use my 88 for remote work and room on drums.
I've had good results with R84 on sax, R92 on trumpet and tuba.
Also 121 and 84 on Trombone.
Jamz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0